He talks about how marriage is too much trouble and that it's better to stay virgin, was he a coping incel or a volcel?
MGTOW for sure. Never pursued women. No way an alpha prophet like him would be incel.
G
Someone who is so highly filled with the Holy Ghost loses their desire for the flesh and the things of the flesh...
Incel. He mentions his physical problems.
Galatians 4:13 "As you know, it was because of an illness that I first preached the gospel to you, and even though my illness was a trial to you, you did not treat me with contempt or scorn."
2 Corinthians 12, 7 "In order to keep me from becoming proud, I was given a thorn in my flesh, a messenger of Satan, to torment me. Three times I pleaded with the Lord to take it away from me. 9 But he said to me, 'My grace is sufficient for you, for my power is made perfect in weakness.'"
Pretty sure that "thorn in his flesh" and that "illness" were some sort of physical problems he had; problems that probably increased due to his lifestyle (=travelling around a lot. Very deadly and dangerous in that day and age.) Now if you combine a physical illness with his outright hostility towards sexuality and his religious fanaticsm and you are a blackpilled enough you can easily deduce that he was an Incel.
I mean, how likely it is that a religious fanatic who is physically ill and hostile to sexuality is NOT an Incel? Just look around this forum...
Galatians 4:13 "As you know, it was because of an illness that I first preached the gospel to you, and even though my illness was a trial to you, you did not treat me with contempt or scorn."
2 Corinthians 12, 7 "In order to keep me from becoming proud, I was given a thorn in my flesh, a messenger of Satan, to torment me. Three times I pleaded with the Lord to take it away from me. 9 But he said to me, 'My grace is sufficient for you, for my power is made perfect in weakness.'"
Pretty sure that "thorn in his flesh" and that "illness" were some sort of physical problems he had; problems that probably increased due to his lifestyle (=travelling around a lot. Very deadly and dangerous in that day and age.) Now if you combine a physical illness with his outright hostility towards sexuality and his religious fanaticsm and you are a blackpilled enough you can easily deduce that he was an Incel.
I mean, how likely it is that a religious fanatic who is physically ill and hostile to sexuality is NOT an Incel? Just look around this forum...
I
MGTOW, back in the day it would be that hard to get a female even for a sub-6.
Its very Buddhist like, detachment from impermanent things of this world
King James version translation
13 Ye know how through infirmity of the flesh I preached the gospel unto you at the first.
14 And my temptation which was in my flesh ye despised not, nor rejected; but received me as an angel of God, even as Christ Jesus.
The early Christians like the Buddhists were trying to get across our bodies, the flesh, the material aspect of this world are temporary, not long lasting. The Spirit is eternal, the flesh is temporary and weak. Here's some of Buddha's sayings from Dhammapada - Mara like Satan temps the Buddha into things of things of this world - he's offered young woman, wealth etc
This is KJV, 1 Corinthians 7
Now concerning the things whereof ye wrote unto me: It is good for a man not to touch a woman.
2 Nevertheless, to avoid fornication, let every man have his own wife, and let every woman have her own husband.
3 Let the husband render unto the wife due benevolence: and likewise also the wife unto the husband.
4 The wife hath not power of her own body, but the husband: and likewise also the husband hath not power of his own body, but the wife.
5 Defraud ye not one the other, except it be with consent for a time, that ye may give yourselves to fasting and prayer; and come together again, that Satan tempt you not for your incontinency.
6 But I speak this by permission, and not of commandment.
7 For I would that all men were even as I myself. But every man hath his proper gift of God, one after this manner, and another after that.
8 I say therefore to the unmarried and widows, it is good for them if they abide even as I.
9 But if they cannot contain, let them marry: for it is better to marry than to burn.
Last edited:
mgtow is an incel in denial.
I am almost sure you are here to spread your anti-religious, anti-traditionalist liberal agenda and for that I ignore you.
G
Yes I agree. The detachment from impermanent things of the world is a universal truth.
Christians and Buddhists agree on that point. What separates the two though is that the Christian asks help from God while the Buddhist does it on his own power.
When your spiritual nature is out, you don't really feel the need for sex.
I've tried it many times. After doing a spiritual thing like praying, listening to gospel music, listening to Christian sermons (the non-lukewarm type like Chuck Crismier, Hank Hannegraph, Omega man radio, Russ Dizdar, etc), reading the Bible...
Or simply slowing down breathing and running chi through my body or just expanding awareness of my chi...
I can then look at porn and won't feel one iota of sexual arousal. I don't care if you're a goddess in human flesh that makes a 10/10 Stacy look like Jabba the Hutt in comparison... and you taunt me with my fetish fuel... Nothing happens. Sex drive off.
Conversely if I ignore my spirit, tried one week of no prayer, listen only to secular music, Alex Jones, etc...
The rage and despair creeps in once again because my spiritual frequency gets lowered.
I've got no agenda.
Paul is neither MGTOW or incel, he is a servant to Christ. Paul at his time was the wisest man since Christ, and has only been since surpassed by Martin Luther.
His views on marriage come from the standpoint of Christianity. Ideally, men would be chaste due to having a full devotion to Christ, but Paul knew that men sin and we cannot defeat sin alone, so we may marry so long as it is in the proper Christian context.
Paul was constantly preaching the Word and knew that the pleasures of women (and the backdraws) were nothing compared to his salvation. The closest thing to call Paul would be a Volcel.
His views on marriage come from the standpoint of Christianity. Ideally, men would be chaste due to having a full devotion to Christ, but Paul knew that men sin and we cannot defeat sin alone, so we may marry so long as it is in the proper Christian context.
Paul was constantly preaching the Word and knew that the pleasures of women (and the backdraws) were nothing compared to his salvation. The closest thing to call Paul would be a Volcel.
D
MTGOW
Similar threads
joocel52
Lonelyus
travis_bickle_
Users who are viewing this thread
