![idkwattodowithlife](/data/avatars/m/0/23.jpg?1549883741)
idkwattodowithlife
Banned
-
- Joined
- Nov 7, 2017
- Posts
- 7,476
Probably wouldn't stop women eye fucking other men, but I wouldn't know to be quite frank.
They've just allowed women to drive, a few months ago lol.torujo said:it's not a cope, just look at arabia saudi
Kointo said:It's cope because laws of man will not overcome laws of nature.
Everything is a cope, except for the...Kointo said:It's cope because laws of man will not overcome laws of nature.
People still did diry and degenerate things behind closed doorsKyloRen said:I agree.Kointo said:It's cope because laws of man will not overcome laws of nature.
Patriarchy may try to limit such behavior, but it is inherent in all human beings.
I guess thats the benefit, but plentiful of Chadlites and Chads would get upset not sleeping around lol.Crustaciouse said:It will stop them from having sex with those men.
idkwattodowithlife said:People still did diry and degenerate things behind closed doors.
idkwattodowithlife said:Chadlites and Chads would get upset not sleeping around lol.
It'd unimaginable for them, let alone for Stacies.KyloRen said:Imagine if Stacy or Chad/-lite had to live our lives.
BlackPillDealer said:Saying patriarchy is a cope because men and women still behave in degenerate ways occasionally is like saying laws against murder and violence are a cope because people still murder and commit acts of violence. Patriarchy is not meant to eliminate all degeneracy, it's meant to restrain it so that society can function in a better way.
Based on the poll results it seems the lookism cuckcels have finalized their takeover of this forum. RIP
This. Degenerates once again showing their retardation in this thread.BlackPillDealer said:Saying patriarchy is a cope because men and women still behave in degenerate ways occasionally is like saying laws against murder and violence are a cope because people still murder and commit acts of violence. Patriarchy is not meant to eliminate all degeneracy, it's meant to restrain it so that society can function in a better way.
Based on the poll results it seems the lookism cuckcels have finalized their takeover of this forum. RIP
blickpall said:Today I found out that making the logical argument that Western society would realistically never accept patriarchy after the women's rights movement and feminism makes me a cuck and a member of a site I never made an account on. Incels.me is a very educational place!
idkwattodowithlife said:Looks the polls aren't looking good or so well for Patriachycels.[/quote
Eh, most Incels who belong in patriarchy no longer post on this forum.
If they did, the polls would show something else entirely.
idkwattodowithlife said:Looks the polls aren't looking good or so well for Patriachycels.
Some people are over themselves. Some people won't bother thinking about the other side of the coin. Forget about them, man.blickpall said:Today I found out that making the logical argument that Western society would realistically never accept patriarchy after the women's rights movement and feminism makes me a cuck and a member of a site I never made an account on. Incels.me is a very educational place!
blickpall said:Today I found out that making the logical argument that Western society would realistically never accept patriarchy after the women's rights movement and feminism makes me a cuck and a member of a site I never made an account on. Incels.me is a very educational place!
Nope, you're delusional. I've genuinely given him that response. Also just leave me the fuck alone.fukmylyf said:look at this female trying to get in good with the mods. Just lol
idkwattodowithlife said:They've just allowed women to drive, a few months ago lol.
oilonthe-Rose said:The last great kingdom is slowly being cucked by feminism.
MayorOfKekville said:That’s like someone in the 1930s saying capitalism would never be accepted again after socialism’s rise. People discover the inherent flaws of a system after experiencing it first hand.
Men will come to realise that it is necessary to control and tame the femoid nature. Men are stronger and smarter than women, and sub-8 men outnumber chad, so we could control it again if we cooperated and worked together. We just need to spread the blackpill. The more men that get cucked, divorceraped and mogged by chad, the better for our cause.
fukmylyf said:I think it's more about the principle. The people opposed to the idea of patriarchy tend to be overly keen on making excuses for females.
Patriarchy has worked well in the past, even if it's unlikely to be reinstated in the west. Then again, stranger things have happened:
![]()
I'm sure there were feminists who thought a gynocentric society would be impossible back in the day. Yet here we are. It amazes me that people still think revolution is impossible after everything we've have accomplished as a species.
IMO, patriarchy is still more realistic than eugenics/transhumanism copes.
blickpall said:This is something I can agree with, in the sense that the spread of the blackpill could potentially lead to legislature and movements which will ultimately benefit groups like us incels and society in general. However, I don't think patriarchy, especially not the extreme types of it that have been pushed by some of the users here, is viable in the West.
I see, that makes sense. That's not what I'm saying at all, though, and I can see that you respond in a way that is indicative of you recognizing this fact. However, others push patriarchy as a black-and-white issue where if you say anything against it for any reason, you are immediately branded a cuck, fakecel, whatever. That kind of rhetoric and discourse is not productive at all, and is especially counter-productive to the people pushing for what would essentially have to be a populist movement. In order to instate patriarchy, one has to enfranchise the majority or at least the largest minority in the political and social spectra.
You bring up a decent point with your image. However, I would argue that the cultural foundations of those examples are extremely different from those found in the majority of Western nations at the moment. Of course as the West continues to lose the immigration and population war against itself, conservative social movements become somewhat more likely, but I don't think that the upheaval of the current balance of power to the degree necessary to have a conservative, religious, Islamic majority in the United States is viable; this would also be the only way I could see it go the way of countries like Iran.
You also make a good point about feminism and gynocentrism, but I think that there is something to said about "equality" vs. forced inequality movements in modern society as well. I don't think it can be argued that the current state of affairs is the result of a push for egalitarianism in which the pendulum swung too far. An inequality, or "oppression" movement as it would be branded, like the establishment of patriarchy would be fundamentally very different from an egalitarian movement and much harder to make palatable to the opposition than egalitarian movements are.
There are a ton of ethical obstacles to even modern, more "humane" eugenics movements like genetic modification, but there are also a ton of scientifically proven positives that those obstacles have to contend with. I guess it's the fact that research is pushing further in that direction while feminism continues to push further in the opposite of what would be a beneficial outcome that makes eugenics seem much more viable for me and likely more palatable for the masses.
What's transhumanism?