Probably wouldn't stop women eye fucking other men, but I wouldn't know to be quite frank.
RE: Is Patriachycel a big cope? Yes or no? And why?
it's not a cope, just look at arabia saudi
it's not a cope, just look at arabia saudi
N
RE: Is Patriachycel a big cope? Yes or no? And why?
it's cope
BIG cope
it's cope
BIG cope
RE: Is Patriachycel a big cope? Yes or no? And why?
They've just allowed women to drive, a few months ago lol.torujo said:
It's cope because laws of man will not overcome laws of nature.
Kointo said:
I agree.
Patriarchy may try to limit such behavior, but it is inherent in all human beings.
It will stop them from having sex with those men.
Everything is a cope, except for the...Kointo said:
People still did diry and degenerate things behind closed doorsKyloRen said:
.I guess thats the benefit, but plentiful of Chadlites and Chads would get upset not sleeping around lol.Crustaciouse said:
idkwattodowithlife said:People still did diry and degenerate things behind closed doors
Absolutely.
idkwattodowithlife said:
Imagine if Stacy or Chad/-lite had to live our lives.
It'd unimaginable for them, let alone for Stacies.KyloRen said:
D
Cope
Looks the polls aren't looking good or so well for Patriachycels .
.
Super cope, largely because the people pushing for it are from countries that haven't had patriarchy in a hundred years. Just LOL if you think that the majority of men or more than a handful of women would sit quietly and accept sharia law or whatever in the liberal West. Once women got the right to vote, patriarchy as a standard died. Any country that has female voters will never have a patriarchy again. The internet makes that even more unlikely.
Perhaps in some ridiculous future scenario that is extremely unlikely, it is possible. Within our lifetimes, it is impossible.
Notice how not one person who is pressed for answers about the patriarchy has any concrete plan for how to enact it. They say we NEED this and then we'll HAVE that, but nowhere in any of their plans is there a concrete method for how to indoctrinate a sufficient sector of society in order to make it feasible. How many incels do you think are part of the military, are high ranking government officials, or hold any sort of sway over society in any shape or form? The number is most likely absolutely tiny, and once you get to those positions, I imagine that you have long forgotten about any ideals of patriarchy and subjugation because trying to mobilize for the installment of such standards will actually work against your current position of power, potentially depriving you of everything you worked hard for in one fell swoop, a pipedream that turns into a real life nightmare.
I am all for people posting about their ideal patriarchy on this forum or elsewhere online, treating it like it's their dream diary. I believe in universal freedom of speech. But it's ludicrous to deny that the patriarchy in the West is anything but a massive, delusional cope.
Perhaps in some ridiculous future scenario that is extremely unlikely, it is possible. Within our lifetimes, it is impossible.
Notice how not one person who is pressed for answers about the patriarchy has any concrete plan for how to enact it. They say we NEED this and then we'll HAVE that, but nowhere in any of their plans is there a concrete method for how to indoctrinate a sufficient sector of society in order to make it feasible. How many incels do you think are part of the military, are high ranking government officials, or hold any sort of sway over society in any shape or form? The number is most likely absolutely tiny, and once you get to those positions, I imagine that you have long forgotten about any ideals of patriarchy and subjugation because trying to mobilize for the installment of such standards will actually work against your current position of power, potentially depriving you of everything you worked hard for in one fell swoop, a pipedream that turns into a real life nightmare.
I am all for people posting about their ideal patriarchy on this forum or elsewhere online, treating it like it's their dream diary. I believe in universal freedom of speech. But it's ludicrous to deny that the patriarchy in the West is anything but a massive, delusional cope.
Saying patriarchy is a cope because men and women still behave in degenerate ways occasionally is like saying laws against murder and violence are a cope because people still murder and commit acts of violence. Patriarchy is not meant to eliminate all degeneracy, it's meant to restrain it so that society can function in a better way.
Based on the poll results it seems the lookism cuckcels have finalized their takeover of this forum. RIP
Based on the poll results it seems the lookism cuckcels have finalized their takeover of this forum. RIP
D
It’s not really cope, it’s a practical solution to the problem of natural female behaviour.
Also, this place is being taken over by cucked WKs.
Also, this place is being taken over by cucked WKs.
BlackPillDealer said:
QFT.
This. Degenerates once again showing their retardation in this thread.BlackPillDealer said:
Today I found out that making the logical argument that Western society would realistically never accept patriarchy after the women's rights movement and feminism makes me a cuck and a member of a site I never made an account on. Incels.me is a very educational place!
D
blickpall said:
That’s like someone in the 1930s saying capitalism would never be accepted again after socialism’s rise. People discover the inherent flaws of a system after experiencing it first hand.
Men will come to realise that it is necessary to control and tame the femoid nature. Men are stronger and smarter than women, and sub-8 men outnumber chad, so we could control it again if we cooperated and worked together. We just need to spread the blackpill. The more men that get cucked, divorceraped and mogged by chad, the better for our cause.
C
idkwattodowithlife said:Looks the polls aren't looking good or so well for Patriachycels
Eh, most Incels who belong in patriarchy no longer post on this forum.
If they did, the polls would show something else entirely.
C
idkwattodowithlife said:Looks the polls aren't looking good or so well for Patriachycels
Eh, most Incels who believe in patriarchy no longer post on this forum.
If they did, the polls would show something else entirely.
Some people are over themselves. Some people won't bother thinking about the other side of the coin. Forget about them, man.blickpall said:
blickpall said:
I think it's more about the principle. The people opposed to the idea of patriarchy tend to be overly keen on making excuses for females.
Patriarchy has worked well in the past, even if it's unlikely to be reinstated in the west. Then again, stranger things have happened:
I'm sure there were feminists who thought a gynocentric society would be impossible back in the day. Yet here we are. It amazes me that people still think revolution is impossible after everything we've have accomplished as a species.
IMO, patriarchy is still more realistic than eugenics/transhumanism copes.
Nope, you're delusional. I've genuinely given him that response. Also just leave me the fuck alone.fukmylyf said:
RE: Is Patriachycel a big cope? Yes or no? And why?
The last great kingdom is slowly being cucked by feminism.
Actually IR Iran is quite good.
I hate my country.
idkwattodowithlife said:
The last great kingdom is slowly being cucked by feminism.
oilonthe-Rose said:
Actually IR Iran is quite good.
I hate my country.
We're too much in the deep-end to ever come back to patriarchy/traditional. Also fantasizing about it, doesn't help. The only way now is thinking to work around the current system.
MayorOfKekville said:
This is something I can agree with, in the sense that the spread of the blackpill could potentially lead to legislature and movements which will ultimately benefit groups like us incels and society in general. However, I don't think patriarchy, especially not the extreme types of it that have been pushed by some of the users here, is viable in the West.
fukmylyf said:I think it's more about the principle. The people opposed to the idea of patriarchy tend to be overly keen on making excuses for females.
Patriarchy has worked well in the past, even if it's unlikely to be reinstated in the west. Then again, stranger things have happened:
I'm sure there were feminists who thought a gynocentric society would be impossible back in the day. Yet here we are. It amazes me that people still think revolution is impossible after everything we've have accomplished as a species.
IMO, patriarchy is still more realistic than eugenics/transhumanism copes.
I see, that makes sense. That's not what I'm saying at all, though, and I can see that you respond in a way that is indicative of you recognizing this fact. However, others push patriarchy as a black-and-white issue where if you say anything against it for any reason, you are immediately branded a cuck, fakecel, whatever. That kind of rhetoric and discourse is not productive at all, and is especially counter-productive to the people pushing for what would essentially have to be a populist movement. In order to instate patriarchy, one has to enfranchise the majority or at least the largest minority in the political and social spectra.
You bring up a decent point with your image. However, I would argue that the cultural foundations of those examples are extremely different from those found in the majority of Western nations at the moment. Of course as the West continues to lose the immigration and population war against itself, conservative social movements become somewhat more likely, but I don't think that the upheaval of the current balance of power to the degree necessary to have a conservative, religious, Islamic majority in the United States is viable; this would also be the only way I could see it go the way of countries like Iran.
You also make a good point about feminism and gynocentrism, but I think that there is something to said about "equality" vs. forced inequality movements in modern society as well. I don't think it can be argued that the current state of affairs is the result of a push for egalitarianism in which the pendulum swung too far. An inequality, or "oppression" movement as it would be branded, like the establishment of patriarchy would be fundamentally very different from an egalitarian movement and much harder to make palatable to the opposition than egalitarian movements are.
There are a ton of ethical obstacles to even modern, more "humane" eugenics movements like genetic modification, but there are also a ton of scientifically proven positives that those obstacles have to contend with. I guess it's the fact that research is pushing further in that direction while feminism continues to push further in the opposite of what would be a beneficial outcome that makes eugenics seem much more viable for me and likely more palatable for the masses.
What's transhumanism?
blickpall said:
Well in my opinion there's two options that are likely to happen:
1. A return to patriarchy. This has happened before and it may happen again, it's the cycle of civilizations. At the end of both the Roman Empire and a few Arab and Persian Empires women were granted more rights and political power. Not long after this, law and order began to fall apart in the empires and eventually they collapsed or were sufficiently weakened to be invaded and taken over by barbarians or other empires. Most likely partially due to the unsustainable policies promoted by women with political influence.
2. The transhumanist option. Basically women are made redundant by the invention of superior technology. Artificial wombs have the potential to be safer and healthier than human wombs in giving birth to human offspring. You can ensure a safe environment, micromanage and optimize nutrients and hormones for the fetus. Skin cells can also potentially be used to develop embryos. Combine that with realistic sexbots or advanced virtual reality and there is no more need for women.
Similar threads
Users who are viewing this thread
