Discussion is Lolicon really that harmful?

[AutistSupremacist]

firstly, I am not attracted to pre pubescents children.

Any criticism I see of lolicon is kind of retarded. Sure, you can be against the sexualization of irl children which is perfectly valid, but these are fictional. On top of that, they are drawn in a way that is very cartoonish and does not resemble reality. You could say, "but doesn't the sexualization of fictional children pave the way for actual pedophilia" well sure, but the same applies for violence, gambling and animal cruelty which are all shown in fiction yet we never blame any of these actions on fictional properties.

 

[Grodd]

 

[the exile]

firstly, I am not attracted to pre pubescents children.

Any criticism I see of lolicon is kind of retarded. Sure, you can be against the sexualization of irl children which is perfectly valid, but these are fictional. On top of that, they are drawn in a way that is very cartoonish and does not resemble reality. You could say, "but doesn't the sexualization of fictional children pave the way for actual pedophilia" well sure, but the same applies for violence, gambling and animal cruelty which are all shown in fiction yet we never blame any of these actions on fictional properties.

did not know diddy was on this forum

 

[Regenerator]

Looney tunes is animal abuse & Saw is torture videos going by the anti lolican logic.

 

[starystulejarz]

Playing GTA games = real murderers and we should lock them all up. It's the same logic as that argument. Most of the times those that are so ultra against lolicon content are pedos irl and just hate that some of them can be relieved with just wanking instead of doing harm against real kids.

 

[justuseless]

Some people are attracted to teenagers who look older than they are. In which case they aren't attracted to the physical markers of an ordinary teenager but normal ones for adults. Conversely some people find 18+ foids who look younger than they are attractive. Are they hebephiles/pedos? Like all moralfagging there's no sound reasoning or logical consistency.

 

[blackpillednigga]

I was never into lolis but I always found the normie virtue signaling against it to be cringe

 

[Anthrofurrcel]

 

[TheJoker]

Plenty of trolls.

 

[SociallyStupid]

It's just an image so I don't think it's harmful. Additionally, the demonisation of Lolis has brought several chilling effects, for example only having huge boobed characters and not having a lot of Chibi characters even though for normally proportioned characters, a lot is essentially "wasted" as it is low information (legs, belly etc. typically only have one color and no interesting details).

 

[weaselbomber]

Who's getting hurt?

 

[HomicidalSuicidal88]

No, its not real only if you make and think it's real then it might be a problem

 

[AtrociousCitizen]

At the end of the day, fiction is fiction.

 

[TooSomething]

 

[4 eyes nolife]

At the end of the day, fiction is fiction.

Not true my ai girlfriend is real!

 

[TooSomething]

Hot topic.

But, as long as some lolicon consumer won't touch real prepubescent kids or consume / trade whatever real child porn, I couldn't care less what cartoons they beat their meat to.

But there is of course the age of consent, so I don't condone fucking anyone younger than that and if you're an adult, you know the law.

No matter what views we may hold, the law is the law.

Don't want to get into trouble, control youselves.
Even if the laws don't really make sense.

 

[Wenhao Xu]

I personally find it weird but I get your point. It's not really hurting anyone.

 

[Balding Subhuman]

I personally think all porn is harmful, lolicon not really being an exception.

As far as lolicon as a genre I'd say its more problematic even if it could be classified as harmless. But porn is never harmless because it shuts down the prefrontal cortex and it can make a person more impulsive.