S
Or is marriage always a cucked act?
Live somewhere no one will ever mog you or your wife in seclusion
S
I'm thinking that chad could have it in some cases, but for average males its virtually impossible?
for chad only unless you want to get cucked
Possible ,only way i could see an actually stable marriage is to live somewhere you cant get mogged by other males.
No, because you have the whole system against you. This is why I write in my profile that there are no individual solutions to structural problems. And women/feminism/marriage are a structural problem.
Just as TRP tries to hide from this inconvenient truth by deluding themselves into thinking that a man only needs to have enough "game" to be free, incels cope by trying to delude themselves into thinking that one only needs to look good enough in order to be free.
But the truth is, that we're all at the mercy of women. Even a very good-looking man is still at the mercy of a woman, still dependent on HER approving of HIM. If he, say, gets problems with erections or has an accident or is in some way not what the woman wants, HE is at HER mercy, not the other way around.
Adorno famously wrote that "there is no right life in the wrong one." And what is true for capitalism (a structural problem without the individual solution of your own bootstraps etc.) is also true for women/feminism: there is no private innocence ("right life") in a feminist society ("wrong life.").
Chad obviously has it better than we do, but this is a matter of degree. This is like field slave vs house slave, Confederate slave versus Ottoman eunuch. Sure, some things are obviously better/worse than others ... but they're still all slaves.
Just as TRP tries to hide from this inconvenient truth by deluding themselves into thinking that a man only needs to have enough "game" to be free, incels cope by trying to delude themselves into thinking that one only needs to look good enough in order to be free.
But the truth is, that we're all at the mercy of women. Even a very good-looking man is still at the mercy of a woman, still dependent on HER approving of HIM. If he, say, gets problems with erections or has an accident or is in some way not what the woman wants, HE is at HER mercy, not the other way around.
Adorno famously wrote that "there is no right life in the wrong one." And what is true for capitalism (a structural problem without the individual solution of your own bootstraps etc.) is also true for women/feminism: there is no private innocence ("right life") in a feminist society ("wrong life.").
Chad obviously has it better than we do, but this is a matter of degree. This is like field slave vs house slave, Confederate slave versus Ottoman eunuch. Sure, some things are obviously better/worse than others ... but they're still all slaves.
Only if you’re Chad or Tyrone.
S
Genius level IQ and solid black pill.
Christian women who go in knowing they must submit to their husbands are pretty sweet.
The downside of that is when shit goes wrong it’s all on you, of course. But even when it’s supoosed to be a partnership foids just blame the man anyway.
The downside of that is when shit goes wrong it’s all on you, of course. But even when it’s supoosed to be a partnership foids just blame the man anyway.
Interstellar IQ.
probably possible but extremely unlikely
with a western woman it's risky
the accountant of my father came home earlier, and saw his wife with another man. He fell in depression and divorced. He lost his house and sees his children only once a week. He was a good worker.
Deal with it
the accountant of my father came home earlier, and saw his wife with another man. He fell in depression and divorced. He lost his house and sees his children only once a week. He was a good worker.
Deal with it
Similar threads
Users who are viewing this thread
