
Sheogorath
Visionary
★★★★★
- Joined
- May 20, 2018
- Posts
- 20,732
Can you actually hate 100% of the opposite sex and still prefer them sexually?
I don't think it's actually possible. I mean yeah, you can be attracted to women and still hate individual women (or even vast amounts of women)...
Hell you can even hate a particular woman and still be attracted to her and want to fuck her. IE the classic "hatefuck" meme.
But... I would argue that WHY you hate her is not because she is a woman, but because of some other reason like her personality/behavior. IE you are being an egalitarian.
A guy hatefucking a woman happens in spite of hating some aspect of who they are because you like that they are a woman, or maybe you hate just half their personality and love the other half of their personality.
The only way I can fathom someone being a true misogynistic male is if they were a homosexual.
The only fathomable truly misandric female is a lesbian.
Even if you view a gender as subhuman, rank your own gender as more important in many respects, I don't think you can actively hate that gender itself and yet for some reason have a sexual preference for it.
Our sexual preference for women is proof of our inherent love for them, it prevents universal hatred for the gender. If we have any mass hatred towards foids it has nothing to do with their gender, and everything to do with the memes too many have adopted (ie culture) which are divisible from their inherent nature, which we still love and want to be with in spite of our distaste towards many of their disgusting mannerisms.
That is not to say we love every aspect of what is female. Hypergamy seems pretty inherrant, and you don't have to love that. But there is definitely more to foids than hypergamy, so you clearly love those other aspects (why you want to fuck them) and so you don't have 100% of what is femaleness.
Plus really... I think we have mixed feelings about hypergamy. It is frustrating, yes, but I think deep down we have a begrudging respect for it too. IE we don't want women to be ubersluts which fuck everything because then she would have no standards at all. If women were HYPOgamous, we'd get our dicks wet in them, but so would every other guy, and it would be non-idealized, coping, depressing...
A very SLIGHT amount of hypergamy is actually a good thing: wanting to be with someone slightly better than yourself... because men ARE slightly better than women on average already, so being with your match would be inherently hypergamous. The problem is more like excess hypergamy ... HYPERhypergamy...
Actually... why do we use the suffix -gamy at all. Isn't monogamy/polygamy about marriage?
In line with the alternate "monoamory" / "polyamory" terms, shouldn't we be calling this hyperamory / hypoamory?
I don't think it's actually possible. I mean yeah, you can be attracted to women and still hate individual women (or even vast amounts of women)...
Hell you can even hate a particular woman and still be attracted to her and want to fuck her. IE the classic "hatefuck" meme.
But... I would argue that WHY you hate her is not because she is a woman, but because of some other reason like her personality/behavior. IE you are being an egalitarian.
A guy hatefucking a woman happens in spite of hating some aspect of who they are because you like that they are a woman, or maybe you hate just half their personality and love the other half of their personality.
The only way I can fathom someone being a true misogynistic male is if they were a homosexual.
The only fathomable truly misandric female is a lesbian.
Even if you view a gender as subhuman, rank your own gender as more important in many respects, I don't think you can actively hate that gender itself and yet for some reason have a sexual preference for it.
Our sexual preference for women is proof of our inherent love for them, it prevents universal hatred for the gender. If we have any mass hatred towards foids it has nothing to do with their gender, and everything to do with the memes too many have adopted (ie culture) which are divisible from their inherent nature, which we still love and want to be with in spite of our distaste towards many of their disgusting mannerisms.
That is not to say we love every aspect of what is female. Hypergamy seems pretty inherrant, and you don't have to love that. But there is definitely more to foids than hypergamy, so you clearly love those other aspects (why you want to fuck them) and so you don't have 100% of what is femaleness.
Plus really... I think we have mixed feelings about hypergamy. It is frustrating, yes, but I think deep down we have a begrudging respect for it too. IE we don't want women to be ubersluts which fuck everything because then she would have no standards at all. If women were HYPOgamous, we'd get our dicks wet in them, but so would every other guy, and it would be non-idealized, coping, depressing...
A very SLIGHT amount of hypergamy is actually a good thing: wanting to be with someone slightly better than yourself... because men ARE slightly better than women on average already, so being with your match would be inherently hypergamous. The problem is more like excess hypergamy ... HYPERhypergamy...
Actually... why do we use the suffix -gamy at all. Isn't monogamy/polygamy about marriage?
In line with the alternate "monoamory" / "polyamory" terms, shouldn't we be calling this hyperamory / hypoamory?