I
It's nothing without a good face imo.
Thoughts?
Thoughts?
No. Anyone saying that is a COPE ARTIST.
FACEman was the most desirable A-Team member.
FACEman was the most desirable A-Team member.
Face is everything
I
VincentVanCope said:
Agreed, I'm 6 ft but have an ogre face, girls have to tilt their head up to see the deformity
Attractiveness
Face 60%
Frame 30%
Height 10%
That's honestly how I figure it. There is a cut off though. You can be so short that you're cute and can never be hot. Most incels like to think that's 6' but that's bs. The shortest a guy can be and still slay is around 5'5. That's the average height for a woman. If he's shorter than the average woman though he isn't going to be taken seriously at all.
Face 60%
Frame 30%
Height 10%
That's honestly how I figure it. There is a cut off though. You can be so short that you're cute and can never be hot. Most incels like to think that's 6' but that's bs. The shortest a guy can be and still slay is around 5'5. That's the average height for a woman. If he's shorter than the average woman though he isn't going to be taken seriously at all.
I
WarmIncelation said:
The cut off is if you're shorter then the girl in question (assuming you've got a food face)
As I've said many times before, 5"7' and up, height DOESN'T MATTER. That being said, if you're below 5"7', you're FUCKED. Doesn't matter if the girl is 4"11', If you're 5"6', she won't be interested.
Height is just a multiplier based on your face
The taller you are, the better. If you're tall AND facially appealing, you're set. However, it's simply over if you're really short, say <5"5
The taller you are, the better. If you're tall AND facially appealing, you're set. However, it's simply over if you're really short, say <5"5
iiiTeMpeR said:
True, it is subjective to the girl. But I'm talking averages. A 5'3 "Chad" might be able to slay 5'3 women. But he is definitely no slayer as he is only viable to a small percentage of the population. But he will never be incel because of his face and frame.
For the most part no. However there are certain breakpoints of height that severely affect attractiveness. sub 5'4 is death sentence. sub 5'8 makes things lots harder. 6+ makes things a lot easier.
Chadistan said:
What about 5'6.5"?
Blackpill101 said:
You're FUCKED. There's a magic threshold and as soon as you are 1 millionth of an inch below 5"7', women instantly don't see you as a sexual being.
Not really, but it's still an undeniably important factor.
Face>height but it takes deformities to make a tallfag truecel
Height is necessary but not sufficient.
H
Height become ultimately important if you have a good face. Justin Bieber would be an ultimate slayer if He was 6'3 with the face he has.
Anyone who chose height should be automatically permabanned for having low IQ.
Face>frame>personality>height (dead srs.)
Face>frame>personality>height (dead srs.)
Chadistan said:
The truth is that anything under 5'9" is unappealing to women.
S
Blackpill101 said:
It's not a hard cutoff, but follows a precise curve.
When you're 5'5, 40 percent of women are taller/same height as you, and essentially unavailable.
Thus the change from 5'5 to 5'10 is huge, as essentially an extra 50 percent of women are now available.
Above 5'10, hight becomes an increasing status symbol, important for the amogging factor, and in life in general.
Face is more important, if you have a good face then height that isn't much below average can be excused by the femoid godesses
I
LOL @ the copers saying yes
It depends tbh. A 5/10 tal duded will mog a 6/10 short one.
PessimisticFailure said:
deformed nosecel checking in
Face is what models are known for, not height. Bad face= over. Short= still a chance.
D
incelman said:
No. Those claiming that to be the case are jealous manlets or fucking trolls. This poll alone blows those shitheads away.
Similar threads
Users who are viewing this thread
