Is it most healthy to eat human meat for development
idk bro
Cannibalism discussed 
Its natural but its not good for you lmfao
W
yep
I dont see why it wouldnt be healthy
Most humans dont eat good enough to taste good or be healthy
No, because a huge number of diseases are transmitted from human to human. Prion diseases are among them.
I think its related to incels, since if you are truly blackpilled and leave all copes behind you realize rape and cannibalism and thousands of other "morally wrong" things are actually naturalCannibalism discussed
The prions you get from eating human flesh can cause severe damage but it’s not that far off from shit Liverking promotes.
It is part of nature and you can absorb power by eating the heart of your enemies
It sounds tasty
Native American thread
Read Might is Right, faggots
Yes
what are these prions? is that also possible if the human eaten is healthy? I just assumed that human meat is healthy since it is that we are made of
I'm pretty sure that even they are appalled by it which is why the Wendigo legend exists
does goatis advocate for cannibalism?
Sounds interesting i might readmax again
I havent heard him "advocate" for it but suggests its natural for humans
Some tribes practiced it. I’m pretty sure the etymology of cannibal comes from the Caniba/Caribs of the caribbean
No. The Jewish elites are cannibalistic pedophiles. Unironically kill yourself if you think so.
Natural does not mean just or moral. From what is one cannot deduce what ought to be, as David Hume rightly noted.
morals are cope for weakness
It's not just prions, it's all diseases. Humans have more diseases in common with humans than humans have with cucumbers or chickens.
Can you argue this rather than postulate it?
but then I think its natural to do it like a few times in a lifespan as something sacred and not regularly? since like the other guy said we share most diseases with other humans
Normies.is
Agreed, I’m not really well researched on the topic.
The only reason we don't do "immoral" things is:
a) laws
b) religion.
I am for example raised christian and I would never rape a foid eventho I hate them, because religion brainwashed me into it. But if only followed natural instincts we humans, like animals, would rape others.
If by natural you mean “exists in nature,” then sure. Tribes have done it, animals do it. If you mean “is part of a healthy functioning and morally upright society,” then absolutely no.
These are not all the reasons.
One of them is related to philosophy, and the other to natural history (evolution).
We are rational and can bind ourselves to the laws that we choose based on pure practical reason (hello, Immanuel Kant).
The second is that we are empathetic (not all and not always and not towards all, i.e. situationally), and this stems from how our species and its predecessors evolved, starting from single-celled organisms. But this applies more to the evolution of primates as social beings.
We are endowed with both emotions and reason, which can be the basis of our morality. As emotivism, or as the acceptance of the categorical imperative (or another idea related to reason).
Man is a thinking and reasoning animal, aware of himself.
Even religious morality often comes not from prescriptions, but directly from religious practice (asceticism, meditation, prayer), which develops compassion in man.
these are man-made concepts. animals don't think about any of this and are happy
That's true but they were few in number and probably wiped out by the Europeans immediately after first contact
I'd also presume that those cannibalistic tribal groups were considered pariahs by the tribes that didn't practice cannibalism which would've led to them being targets for war parties. Most of the cannibalistic tribes that existed were probably destroyed before the Europeans ever even set foot in the Americas tbh, we just have no records
Animals perform altruistic actions and care for their fellows, not just their relatives.
ok, but also "immoral" people can do that. a serial killer could see a crying kid and comfort it and still do all kinds of other "immoral" things. we may have things like empathy, but that doesn't mean that there are natural morals
Sure. But people don't become maniacs by choice. If you look at the stories of famous maniacs, you'll find that they have serious predispositions or mental problems.
For example, Jeffrey Dunmer was a homosexual and was aroused by viscera. He liked to put his ear to the stomach of his victims and listen to the intestines move.
This applies to psychopaths too, their empathy is altered. Many cannot get pleasure from doing good deeds. But most people will feel good if they help a random passerby.
In this sense, yes, a psychopath will not become happy by helping others, because his brain works differently. However, even a psychopath can behave morally if his moral code is based on reason.
You said that it was made by man. People discover mathematical theorems by proving hypotheses in their head. But who would dare call them made by man? Mathematics from axioms to the most sophisticated propositions can be proven by a machine. Some mathematicians even compared this to the great geographical discoveries. Discoveries of a landscape that exists apart from man.
Why can't it be the same with morality?
It's the same with logic. If you take the laws of logic and true premises, then it doesn't matter who, where and when comes to conclusions - the conclusions will be correct. These arguments occur in a person's head, but they are applicable to the entire Universe.
We see a striking connection between the objective and thinking.
Moreover, Logic is considered a normative discipline. The laws of logic are not the insurmountable laws of physics. But reasoning will lead nowhere (or rather, anywhere), if you don't follow logic.
I'm not talking about God, by the way. I'm talking about the fact that there is a striking connection between thinking and the Universe. No, positive thinking doesn't work. But mathematics and logic do.
To sum it up: It is difficult for a person to be happy by going against his nature. If you are an empathic person, then by acting morally you will be happier than by forcing yourself to harm others.
But even if you are not an empathic person, your beliefs do not necessarily have to be immoral, because the assertion that one should act immorally requires justification just as much as the opposite.
Inceldom discussed.
never began for you if you didn’t eat human meat during puberty
Avoid the brain
Similar threads
Users who are viewing this thread
