The Macron’s are suing Candace now for defamation.
Very unlikely
Idk & Idc
Yes
B
This disgusting Troon has all the inherited sadist characteristics of the Pedo Troon. She seduced him at 15 and you know the rest.
Should be obvious
It’s just that Candace is a very untrustworthy person, she thinks dinosaurs are a hoax
I don't think it's a man tbh
But anything degrading Fagcron's reputation is funny, deserved and good to take
But anything degrading Fagcron's reputation is funny, deserved and good to take
Never got why yall get stuck on stupid conspiracies like this. "Is the moon landing fake" how does that change the fact that the Jews run the world "
Nah, almost certainly not.
No. Though she does look sus. In the current climate she would lose more by hiding her transgenerism, than being totally open about it.
That was so funny when he/she/it slapped Macron on the plane
Imagine being such a hag people think you’re a man and start making convoluted theories about your transitioning
Feminists and agecucks want us to believe that she's "real beauty" and liking anything younger makes you a "pedo"Imagine being such a hag people think you’re a man and start making convoluted theories about your transitioning
S
He is
you dont believe in evolution?
I believe in adaptation.
If evolution was true then we'd be constantly surrounded by lots of NEW various random freaky lifeforms. We aren't.
I see why that thought might seem to challenge evolution, but it’s actually based on a misunderstanding of how evolution works and how often “new” species appear.
Evolution is slow — really slow
- Evolution works over thousands to millions of years, not days or decades.
- For a “new” lifeform to appear that looks dramatically different from existing ones, it needs many generations of small changes, most of which aren’t noticeable in a human lifetime.
- In our short lifespans, we mostly see variation within species (e.g., different dog breeds, bacteria developing antibiotic resistance) rather than totally new creatures.
Natural selection filters out “random freaky lifeforms”
- Random mutations do happen all the time, but most are harmful or neutral.
- Harmful mutations usually make the organism less likely to survive or reproduce, so they disappear quickly.
- The result: We’re not surrounded by mutant creatures because natural selection removes most of them before they become common.
We do see new species — just not giant monsters in our backyard
- New species are being documented regularly, but they’re often subtle changes from existing species or happen in places we don’t usually look (deep sea, rainforests, microorganisms).
- Example: London Underground Mosquito evolved from a surface species and now can’t breed with the above-ground version — that’s a new species within about 150 years.
- Many “freaky” forms exist in deep oceans or remote jungles; they’re just not popping into city parks overnight.
Evolution today is faster in some life forms
- Bacteria, viruses, and insects evolve in years or even months because their generations are so short. That’s why we get new flu strains, drug-resistant bacteria, and pesticide-resistant pests so quickly.
So, if evolution is true (and all modern biology evidence supports it), you wouldn’t expect constant brand-new, radically different animals showing up around you.
You’d expect small, gradual shifts most of the time — and that’s exactly what we see.
If you say so WikipedianI see why that thought might seem to challenge evolution, but it’s actually based on a misunderstanding of how evolution works and how often “new” species appear.
- Evolution works over thousands to millions of years, not days or decades.
- For a “new” lifeform to appear that looks dramatically different from existing ones, it needs many generations of small changes, most of which aren’t noticeable in a human lifetime.
- In our short lifespans, we mostly see variation within species (e.g., different dog breeds, bacteria developing antibiotic resistance) rather than totally new creatures.
- Random mutations do happen all the time, but most are harmful or neutral.
- Harmful mutations usually make the organism less likely to survive or reproduce, so they disappear quickly.
- The result: We’re not surrounded by mutant creatures because natural selection removes most of them before they become common.
- New species are being documented regularly, but they’re often subtle changes from existing species or happen in places we don’t usually look (deep sea, rainforests, microorganisms).
- Example: London Underground Mosquito evolved from a surface species and now can’t breed with the above-ground version — that’s a new species within about 150 years.
- Many “freaky” forms exist in deep oceans or remote jungles; they’re just not popping into city parks overnight.
- Bacteria, viruses, and insects evolve in years or even months because their generations are so short. That’s why we get new flu strains, drug-resistant bacteria, and pesticide-resistant pests so quickly.
So, if evolution is true (and all modern biology evidence supports it), you wouldn’t expect constant brand-new, radically different animals showing up around you.
You’d expect small, gradual shifts most of the time — and that’s exactly what we see.
There's always good answers to both sides of any debate...
Similar threads
nihilum
Users who are viewing this thread
