IT will not touch this. This is what we mean when we say when "Chad can't sexually assault someone."
"b-b-but she consented you silly inkwell you don't understand consent" no she didn't at the start. He just kissed her and she decided AFTER he started that it was okay. So the exact same action if done by an ugly man would be sexual assault.
It's literally your
LOOKS that decide whether or not a crime took place hence sexual harassment / assault is nothing more than codified lookism. He acted (as many Chads do) without having any idea whether she "consented" they do this often grab female's asses, kiss them, grope them, in some cases rape them, etc.
This is all tolerated and swept under the rug their entire lives yet we're supposed to take the #MeToo movement with the most utmost sincerity and be profoundly outraged at every case of sexual assault. How about no.
They also don't understand just how minuscule an action from an ugly man needs to be for it to be considered "sexual harrasment" or "sexual assault." A simple compliment on how someone looks from an incel is "sexual harrasment." A touch on the arm (typical conversational touching) is as well. I even argued with people on IT that told me that poor kid getting arrested for touching a girl's arm was totally justified. Yet they all believe this guy should walk free because the girl decided it's okay that he did something without consent.
This is pure unadulterated ragefuel.
@FrailPaleStaleMale