What's new

Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.
Log in Register

Follow Us On Social Media

LifeFuel Infiltrators seething rn

OwariDa said:
I was already a well known user before u even knew this place existed lil nigga
Click to expand...
Uh huh sure righ righ righ righ
the sopranos smoking GIF

Season 9 Yes GIF by Friends
 
Grim_Reaper said:
They only take the most neutral people to be mods and @based_meme will nuke half the forum if he becomes one.
Click to expand...
Neutrality entails tolerance, but not the converse, since tolerance is internal disapproval but tacitly outward approval. If you're neutral about something, your tolerance is a passive byproduct that is observed. If you're tolerant, it means that you lean against the thing in question in some way (morally, ideally etc.), but in the interest of peace/order/harmony you're accepting of it. Neutrality is IDGAF. Tolerance is IGAF, but whatever. Enforcement of rules and setting boundaries (whether personal boundaries for yourself or the domain in which you're in, like a place or group you belong to) implies intolerance, because simply having a rule means you are intolerant of the thing you have a rule against. No homosexuals allowed on the forum ---> intolerant of homosexuals on the forum. Therefore, to be a mod, you must necessarily be INTOLERANT of the things you are enforcing against. Therefore, mods cannot be neutral.

Besides, what are you implying here? That we should be neutral (and thus tolerant of their presence here) towards faggots and others (holes, larps, fakecels etc.) who don't belong on the forum? That the mods are tolerant of faggots (lenient, it would seem)? That half the forum are faggots? Supposing that it were, in fact, true that half of the forum is full of faggots, you're saying "nuke half the forum" like it would be a bad thing? This place isn't reddit or the rest of the internet. JFL

Insofar as everyone who isn't any of the aforementioned and they belong here, I'm as neutral as they come, but I've been gradually leaning towards lawful neutral instead of true neutral, as of late, because of the increase in femdom cucks and incest/bestiality degenerates over the last year or so.
 
Last edited:
based_meme said:
Neutrality entails tolerance, but not the converse, since tolerance is internal disapproval but tacitly outward approval. If you're neutral about something, your tolerance is a passive byproduct that is observed. If you're tolerant, it means that you lean against the thing in question in some way (morally, ideally etc.), but in the interest of peace/order/harmony you're accepting of it. Neutrality is IDGAF. Tolerance is IGAF, but whatever. Enforcement of rules and setting boundaries (whether personal boundaries for yourself or the domain in which you're in, like a place or group you belong to) implies intolerance, because simply having a rule means you are intolerant of the thing you have a rule against. No homosexuals allowed on the forum ---> intolerant of homosexuals on the forum. Therefore, to be a mod, you must necessarily be INTOLERANT of the things you are enforcing against. Therefore, mods cannot be neutral.

Besides, what are you implying here? That we should be neutral (and thus tolerant of their presence here) towards faggots and others (holes, larps, fakecels etc.) who don't belong on the forum? That the mods are tolerant of faggots (lenient, it would seem)? That half the forum are faggots? Supposing that it were, in fact, true that half of the forum is full of faggots, you're saying "nuke half the forum" like it would be a bad thing? This place isn't reddit or the rest of the internet. JFL

Insofar as everyone who isn't any of the aforementioned and they belong here, I'm as neutral as they come, but I've been gradually leaning towards lawful neutral instead of true neutral, as of late, because of the increase in femdom cucks and incest/bestiality degenerates over the last year or so.
Click to expand...
Dnr
 
PLA1092 said:
i have a very high salary :dafuckfeels:
Click to expand...
We were like two young Irish laddies pissing off coppers in Dublin singing nationalist songs but then you went ahead and joined the police force

This is betrayal
 
Ricordanza said:
We were like two young Irish laddies pissing off coppers in Dublin singing nationalist songs but then you went ahead and joined the police force

This is betrayal
Click to expand...
brutal ngl :dafuckfeels:
 
based_meme said:
Neutrality entails tolerance, but not the converse, since tolerance is internal disapproval but tacitly outward approval. If you're neutral about something, your tolerance is a passive byproduct that is observed. If you're tolerant, it means that you lean against the thing in question in some way (morally, ideally etc.), but in the interest of peace/order/harmony you're accepting of it. Neutrality is IDGAF. Tolerance is IGAF, but whatever. Enforcement of rules and setting boundaries (whether personal boundaries for yourself or the domain in which you're in, like a place or group you belong to) implies intolerance, because simply having a rule means you are intolerant of the thing you have a rule against. No homosexuals allowed on the forum ---> intolerant of homosexuals on the forum. Therefore, to be a mod, you must necessarily be INTOLERANT of the things you are enforcing against. Therefore, mods cannot be neutral.

Besides, what are you implying here? That we should be neutral (and thus tolerant of their presence here) towards faggots and others (holes, larps, fakecels etc.) who don't belong on the forum? That the mods are tolerant of faggots (lenient, it would seem)? That half the forum are faggots? Supposing that it were, in fact, true that half of the forum is full of faggots, you're saying "nuke half the forum" like it would be a bad thing? This place isn't reddit or the rest of the internet. JFL

Insofar as everyone who isn't any of the aforementioned and they belong here, I'm as neutral as they come, but I've been gradually leaning towards lawful neutral instead of true neutral, as of late, because of the increase in femdom cucks and incest/bestiality degenerates over the last year or so.
Click to expand...
ion what you said but giga based
 
and how many are GrAYs?
 
how many people are ignoring me?
 
how many are ignoring me? Only NT pill deniers I hope
 
@PLA1092 who is ignoring @kay' now?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Efiliste
Discussion Who here wants to be in an incel documentary ?
Replies
10
Views
210
Copexodius Maximus
Copexodius Maximus
Despicablecel
im so horny rn
Replies
6
Views
114
Ricordanza
Ricordanza
Vlarke
1 year ago Saint Kosta took revenge on the bully scum
Replies
39
Views
520
Rottingcel
Rottingcel
benzocel
JFL hundreds of foids seething in the comments because they had their persoynalities complimented by a guy
Replies
24
Views
641
Puer aeternus
Puer aeternus
der_komische
Venting calling out the mods
Replies
2
Views
143
anandkonda
anandkonda

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 2 (Incels: 0, Bluepillers: 2)

Follow Us On Social Media

546,469Threads
12,649,462Posts
25,387Members
CobscellNew Lost Soul

About Us

Incels.is is a community for men that struggle with or are unable to get into romantic relationships with women despite trying. We welcome men from all walks of life, and from all cultural and racial backgrounds, as long as you are an incel.

Online statistics

Members online
146
Guests online
2,468
Total visitors
2,614
Totals may include hidden visitors.
shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top