Athletics and ice cream is a cherry on top of the suicide cake.
Pure delusion. Every example of supposed inferiority put forward has been dealt with
If the average curry is a 3/10 in looks and the average white is a 6/10, doesn’t it seem reasonable?
This was your claim:
If almost everyone of a certain race gets mogged by almost everyone of another race.
If curries indeed were 3/10 on average and whites were 6/10 (whatever that means). Even then by sheer nature of statistics it would be factually untrue that almost every curry is mogged by almost every white. Its a standard deviation of 33% on a 10 point scale.
. Curries have it bad in most things.
This claim is still as unsubstantiated as ever. Too broad to convey any meaningful information. The words "bad" and "thing" are left undefined
White people and white looking people were literally desired among all races even in the past. In ancient curryland, the brahmins would brag about being superior due to having fair skin. In sand nigger land, whites were seen as superior and handsome, as Muhammad’s family was lightskin and seen as very handsome. Even slave traders wanted blonde hair blue eyed women more than any other. Even r/justberice were bragging about some ancient chinese emperor cucking sand niggers by taking blonde hair blue eyed Iranian women and those being his favourite women.
"White race" and "fair skin" are two different concepts. Nowadays white people might be advantaged by naturally possessing a feature that was historically associated with good aesthetics in Indo-european cultures. But that doesn't mean that ancient people were surrounding their culture around worshipping people of european descent. And white skin is NOT the only advantage white people may have smv wise. There might be other things which are actually quite recent and irrelevant to ancients.
Average IQ in a race determines the type of civilization you sill probably live in. High iq races like whites and east asians can build amazing civilizations,
This is factually incorrect.
1. Modern civilization is a very recent phenomena. I can understand how people who have zero understanding of history (which is most race austists) can be lead to believe that this is due to some innate "white iq". But they'd be forgetting the fact that europeans were living pretty similar lifestyles to everyone else in eurasia for most of history. If that theory were true then white people would've used their " High average iq" to develop airplanes in ancient rome. The only people who lived differently in ancient times were africans but you cannot prove that it was due to "low average iq" and not any other factor. Your claims are baseless and unsubstantiated.
2. "amazing civilizations", "while curries and blacks live in sewage."
Intellectually bankrupt , bold but meaningless value judgements that convey zero information and are divorced from reality. Just further proof that race autism is informed, not by logic, science, facts or rationality,. But by subjective preferences, racial hatred, wild emotions and hyperbole.
You can’t deny being curry is an extremely important factor when it comes to foids choosing who they want to fuck. It’s like denying tall people mog short people and saying “who is this person named short? Oh right, it’s billions of people and many who are having sex”.
Height is different from racial identity and the less said about what random criteria modern holes use to chose their partners the better. As far as I am concerned they shouldn't even have a choice.
Anyway this topic has shifted from the meaningless claim that curries are failing at everything. Which has sufficiently been addressed.
How is it any different than height?
Height is fundamentally innate. Any value given to tall height is associated in and of itself without any references to external advantages that tall height may give. You don't love a tall person because he can reach the top shelf. You love a tall person for his tallness itself
But curry subhumanity is reasoned into existence by referencing external factors curries supposedly fail at. Which means curriness itself is not inherently inferior without the reasons for inferiority associated with it. Which are mutually exclusive to currydom.
(In reality, the race autist sees currydom the same way he sees shortness. He doesn't think that curries are inferior because of arbitrary x or y reason. He thinks they are inferior just for being curries in and of itself. And then he reverse engineers cherrypicked and easily debunkable arguments for failure of curries in different fields. Just to justify his fundamental belief in curry inferiority).
No, this is completely incorrect. An example I can give is this:
en.m.wikipedia.org
there are circumstances where not responding to the stimulus itself can be costly, as females may ignore the actual stimulus in the correct context, and lose the
fitness benefits that come with it
Therefore in a broader sense non sexual natural selection is still as valid as ever and still dictates sexual selection.
I never said it would be random, but this is based on the idea that females will be far more sexually selective if they have the opportunity. If the environment not prosperous enough and has too much ecological difficulty, then females will have to focus more of their attention on mates that will help them . This will make the population less attractive in the long run.
Oof. A lot of assumptions here. First off, natural selection and ecological difficulty are two very different things. The former is permanent. I'm going to assume you are talking about the latter and you didn't actually mean natural selection all along.
Your statement assumes that we are speaking of a specific type of species where females need to be taken care of by the males and selection is based on those requirements. In that case......
"
acquire resources (beta buck) rather than go for what they find attractive
These two things are not exclusive to each other.
Curries evolved in the low energy environment is what I’m talking about.
So let me get this straight. Your argument is that curries evolved in situations of scarcity so their women selected for providers instead of men they found attractive and hence curries became ugly.
Frankly I don't even know where to start. It would need an entirely new post just to address how much is wrong with this.
over for curries
