By "laughed," IncelTears users ALWAYS mean that they're really angry about how stupid you're making them look. Hey, you forgot to post some crying tears of laughter emojis. That would make it even more believable! Maybe even type "LOL" to prove it even more.
On the other hand, I'm angry about how stupid YOU ARE. You deserve to have the shit beaten out of you for being such an unbelievable fucking dolt. I WISH violence against women were anywhere near as common as you pretend it is. What group deserves it more? You're disgusting psychopaths.
Dipshit, since I know you're reading this...read very carefully: I am restating what FEMINISTS OF YOUR ILK say and following it to its logical conclusions.
How in the flying fuck do you not get that?
YOU imply that every interaction with men is coercion. YOU say that men shouldn't ask women out ANYWHERE because the woman is too much of a fragile little pussy bitch to user her words like an adult to let the man know she's not interested. YOU say that if it's in private, it's dangerous, and if it's in public, it's socially uncomfortable. YOU view sex as "inherently threatening." That's why you insist that men ask for verbal consent before everything they do, and imply that women can't consent anyway because of the implied threat of the man being stronger.
I am following YOUR logic to its conclusion, you utter imbecile. If men asking women out in private is an implied threat, and women are afraid to say no, then logically, by your definition of "consent," WOMEN CAN NEVER CONSENT, because they could just be afraid to say no to the sex because of this implied threat.
You are proving my points with this response and you are somehow so utterly, impossibly fucking retarded that you don't realize it.
You're an absolute fucking moron who has never looked at the data. Violence against women is FAR less common than violence against men. A simple google search will show you that. You have about as much chance of being struck by lightning as you do of being raped by a stranger.
What do you mean "WE'RE" what's in the dark? How in the fuck do you think that makes any sense? Holy fuck are you a disgusting idiot.
This is the female solipsism and psychopathy talking. All men are the same person, therefore when men attack other men, it doesn't count.
No, paint chip eater, MEN ARE AT FAR MORE RISK WHEN WE'RE WALKING ALONE IN THE DARK. FAR MORE. Yet we don't whine about it, because we're not sniveling little princesses the way women are.
If you're a woman and you're not walking in a bad neighborhood (an area with a lot of negroes...that's factually what bad neighborhoods are), your chances of anyone attacking you are not only far lower than that of men, but virtually nonexistent.
Get this through zir skull, you nonbinary otherkin: You. Are. A. Moron.
