They always cook up the most stupid responses and then they start patting each other on the back and sucking the cum out of each other's used condoms while high on virtue signaling.
For example. They LOVE to screencap whenever one of us says something along these lines: "rape is a crime but it isn't nearly as bad as murder, amputation, torture etc...".
And one of their beloved respones is: "They'll say that it's completely different when someone shoves a dick in a man".
I mean, am I the only one who sees this response as absolutely retarded? Of course it's fucking different when it happens to a man.
Women have a fucking organ designed to be penetrated by a penis, it is shaped for a penis' entry. They enjoy a penis in their vagina (not saying they would enjoy being raped, but the physical sensation resulting from penis in a cunt is pleasure for the woman, or at least would hurt less than a dick shoved up a man's ass). Not only that, their entire lives they've been the more submissive, "feminine" sex. Being in the submissive, receiving position during sex is more normal for them (although rape would make it much worse and obviously not enjoyable). OF COURSE all of this is different from a man being raped, in a hole that wasn't designed for that, now being in a submissive role that he wasn't basically trained for his entire life like women are. ON TOP OF THAT, it would be gay rape, which is very different from straight rape, adding another fucked up layer on why it's different.
I know these fucking retards will take the things I've said out of context. Of course they will give examples about the extreme exceptions (hurr durr what if she gets aids from the rape, what if she gets pregnant). Totally ignoring that we are not speaking about those extreme cases that are a very small percentage of rapes. Or they'll say that a woman can be anally raped too, despite those being again, a much lower percentage.
For example. They LOVE to screencap whenever one of us says something along these lines: "rape is a crime but it isn't nearly as bad as murder, amputation, torture etc...".
And one of their beloved respones is: "They'll say that it's completely different when someone shoves a dick in a man".
I mean, am I the only one who sees this response as absolutely retarded? Of course it's fucking different when it happens to a man.
Women have a fucking organ designed to be penetrated by a penis, it is shaped for a penis' entry. They enjoy a penis in their vagina (not saying they would enjoy being raped, but the physical sensation resulting from penis in a cunt is pleasure for the woman, or at least would hurt less than a dick shoved up a man's ass). Not only that, their entire lives they've been the more submissive, "feminine" sex. Being in the submissive, receiving position during sex is more normal for them (although rape would make it much worse and obviously not enjoyable). OF COURSE all of this is different from a man being raped, in a hole that wasn't designed for that, now being in a submissive role that he wasn't basically trained for his entire life like women are. ON TOP OF THAT, it would be gay rape, which is very different from straight rape, adding another fucked up layer on why it's different.
I know these fucking retards will take the things I've said out of context. Of course they will give examples about the extreme exceptions (hurr durr what if she gets aids from the rape, what if she gets pregnant). Totally ignoring that we are not speaking about those extreme cases that are a very small percentage of rapes. Or they'll say that a woman can be anally raped too, despite those being again, a much lower percentage.
Last edited:
