tbh definetely not this tho because the problem with communism is that it is equality on an economic level, meaning that it would screw rich hardworking incels over and help poor chad and stacy
the problem with commie regimes
it requires communism to be international, stateless and moneyfree(literally, money free)
-international
communist regimes fail because humans are inherently tribal/nationalistic, as long as there is racial diversity and cultural diversity, there still will be tribalism, so even without a state you will still see a national anarchist type setting
-stateless
according to many communist/socialist/marxist theorists, communism is a utopia, and a socialist government is the way to get there and that if a socialist gov stays for a long time, it is failure. yet, (save few)no one will VOLUNTARILY give up their wealth, thus an authoritarian government is needed, so , they need to stay around for a long time to make sure everyone is equal
-moneyfree
once you take money out, you take out incentive to work, even in socialist countries(from what I have heard)while every factory received equal pay, the competiton was in production levels, the higher, the more likely one will get a promotion
also only time communist regimes worked was when they were reformed until they are not commie anymore(exp.China)
Only type of socialism that works(maybe) is the third positionist kind, where it is just racialist social democracy(NSDAP germany)or nazbol but without the name(baathism and jamharriya aka green libya muammar gaddafi thought)
even then Nazbol socialism is a hit or miss
also
the best option at this point is a shift from a human oriented free market to a transhumanist free market