Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

News Incels mentioned in German state television

Iamnothere000

Iamnothere000

Veteran
★★★★
Joined
Nov 13, 2019
Posts
1,308
There is a semi popular comedy segment in German state television.
My family and I are watching it habitually almost every Friday evening.
However, it has long since become unfunny due to political correctness.

Therefore I was not paying attention and browsed this forum instead.

Suddenly the moderator started talking about Incels, MGTOW and NoFap.

Suspicious Monkey GIF by MOODMAN



Some talking points:

“There are no female Incels because women who can’t get a partner cope with TV and icecream and look for the problem in themselves.”
“Lonely guys should cope with foam baths and lavender scented candles.”

It was quite forced but I appreciate the attention.

Here is the link if you are interested:

https://www.zdf.de/comedy/heute-show
(5. März 2021, bei 22:50 Minuten)
 
Imagine watching TV in 2021.
 
There are no female Incels because women who can’t get a partner cope with TV and icecream and look for the problem in themselves DO NOT EXIST
Fixed that bluepilled shit
 
There is a semi popular comedy segment in German state television.
My family and I are watching it habitually almost every Friday evening.
However, it has long since become unfunny due to political correctness.

Therefore I was not paying attention and browsed this forum instead.

Suddenly the moderator started talking about Incels, MGTOW and NoFap.

Suspicious Monkey GIF by MOODMAN



Some talking points:

“There are no female Incels because women who can’t get a partner cope with TV and icecream and look for the problem in themselves.”
“Lonely guys should cope with foam baths and lavender scented candles.”

It was quite forced but I appreciate the attention.

Here is the link if you are interested:

https://www.zdf.de/comedy/heute-show
(5. März 2021, bei 22:50 Minuten)
They talked about us in the HeuteShow (Germancels GTFIH) | Incels.co - Involuntary Celibate
They also made the Tatort about us.
 
Im not featured so not interested
 
it seems harmless

though germans seem to be a relatively humorless bunch and this does nothing to disprove that stereotype
 
Sry Bro, I did not see that.

…I will have to watch this Tatort though, it’s one of the few good German productions IMO.
No problem. Incels are in certain circles the new hate object. There are also some feminists that wrote articles/books about us. One of them was also in an extremely cringeworthy documentary about us, she also makes lectures about us in universities:

View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jp-ZG7EfdiA

(Note, the experts that get paid to talk about us don't even recognise an ironic statement like the "Catgirls In Valhallah" stuff)

They also made another documentary about us (specifically for teenage/child audiences) in the Y-Kollektiv, where they realised that many were ethnicels (something that is often denied in other documentaries about us that try to paint us as an exclusively white and right-wing phenomenon):

View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ArKsF6nbMHA&t=382s


We have long been a talking point by the media and this weekend it all exploded with both the Tatort and the HeuteShow talking about us.
Also politicians have been talking about us for a long time - like Katharina Schulze for example, who also shared the dox of a quasi-famous, self-declared "incel" on Twitter (everything in quotation marks because incel has sadly become a self-deprecating self-designation among many zoomers that don't even fulfill the qualifications for it). Also many young people use incel nowadays as a synonym for nerd/freak/etc.
 
Look ma I’m on TV
 
They also made another documentary about us (specifically for teenage/child audiences) in the Y-Kollektiv, where they realised that many were ethnicels (something that is often denied in other documentaries about us that try to paint us as an exclusively white and right-wing phenomenon)
Nowadays the hatred towards anything that isn't on the left side of the spectrum is encouraged. So in order for incels to be hated that much they had to be lumped in with other groups that were already on the "hate radar". If most incels were, for example, antifa supporters it'd be hard for the media to portray us in a negative light since any critic toward us in that case would imply that antifa, BLM, etc. are all just as bad as we allegedly are. Thus, it's easier to say we're a right wing group. Moreover, the incel problem is a Western problem so it's kind of inevitable that the majority of incels are white since most Western countries are predominantly white. The problem with bluepillers is that they look at the abosulte percentages instead of comparing the number of white incels to the the percentage of whites in the entire population. If they did that, they'll realize that an ethnic person is more likely to be incel. But as we already know by now, math isn't their strong suit.
 
Nowadays the hatred towards anything that isn't on the left side of the spectrum is encouraged. So in order for incels to be hated that much they had to be lumped in with other groups that were already on the "hate radar". If most incels were, for example, antifa supporters it'd be hard for the media to portray us in a negative light since any critic toward us in that case would imply that antifa, BLM, etc. are all just as bad as we allegedly are. Thus, it's easier to say we're a right wing group. Moreover, the incel problem is a Western problem so it's kind of inevitable that the majority of incels are white since most Western countries are predominantly white. The problem with bluepillers is that they look at the abosulte percentages instead of comparing the number of white incels to the the percentage of whites in the entire population. If they did that, they'll realize that an ethnic person is more likely to be incel. But as we already know by now, math isn't their strong suit.
The thing is that leftist liberalism must do the splits all the time, because it supports every group (except white heterosexual males), when somebody dances on all parties, it dances on no party; when you try to be the right one for everyone you are the right one for nobody in the end. The leftist liberal realises that "We hate whitey" is the only common denominator among these groups, that's why he is so anti-white/focused on hatred against whites.
This is the only thing that keeps the group together, if it wasn't for whitey their interest groups would eat each other, because they have mutually exclusive particular interests in almost everything except the hatred towards whitey - look at muslims and adolescent white women/sexual deviants for example. These are all groups supported by leftist liberalism because they aren't white heterosexual males - but they are polar antitheses of each other, a strict muslim would penalise adultery/sexual deviance and the sexual deviants/adolescent women have in muslims everything they despise due to their focus on tradition/honor/nationalism/family values/discipline/etc. (everything they allegedly hate about whitey).
In the moment they still have whitey as the punching bag and this is the only thing that keeps them from cannibalising each other. Leftist liberalism has no end goal except punching whitey, if whitey wasn't there it would literally completely implode. And this is why they hide non-white incels: They just don't want to see how conflicting/contradictory their ideas are, that the groups they support have mutually exclusive interests. They don't want to be confronted with their entire mess of a world view that is only kept together with le evil whitey as the glue.
That's why they vehemently ignore every evidence of non-white incels, what shouldn't exist doesn't exist. It's better to ignore something like that than to be confronted with a contradiction and a moral dilemma, they would be forced to make a decision and decide to further the interest of only one sacred group (white women or non-white men) otherwise because the interests of these groups are mutually exclusive - that decision would lead to a fragmentation of their political camp/voter base which would rob them of potential political power. That's why they say only whitey is an incel, while the rape statistics and the flyers they had to press that teach about sexual consent say the complete opposite. Complete mental gymnastics are required to support Islam, LGBTQ+ rights and womens' rights at the same time when you have even a small amount of vision for the future. @your personality
 
Last edited:
The thing is that leftist liberalism must do the splits all the time, because it supports every group (except white heterosexual males), when somebody dances on all parties, it dances on no party; when you try to be the right one for everyone you are the right one for nobody in the end. The leftist liberal realises that "We hate whitey" is the only common denominator among these groups, that's why he is so anti-white/focused on hatred against whites.
This is the only thing that keeps the group together, if it wasn't for whitey their interest groups would eat each other, because they have mutually exclusive particular interests in almost everything except the hatred towards whitey - look at muslims and adolescent white women/sexual deviants for example. These are all groups supported by leftist liberalism because they aren't white heterosexual males - but they are polar antitheses of each other, a strict muslim would penalise adultery/sexual deviance and the sexual deviants/adolescent women have in muslims everything they despise due to their focus on tradition/honor/nationalism/family values/discipline/etc. (everything they allegedly hate about whitey).
In the moment they still have whitey as the punching bag and this is the only thing that keeps them from cannibalising each other. Leftist liberalism has no end goal except punching whitey, if whitey wasn't there it would literally completely implode. And this is why they hide non-white incels: They just don't want to see how conflicting/contradictory their ideas are, that the groups they support have mutually exclusive interests. They don't want to be confronted with their entire mess of a world view that is only kept together with le evil whitey as the glue.
That's why they vehemently ignore every evidence of non-white incels, what shouldn't exist doesn't exist. It's better to ignore something like that than to be confronted with a contradiction and a moral dilemma, they would be forced to make a decision and decide to further the interest of only one sacred group (white women or non-white men) otherwise because the interests of these groups are mutually exclusive - that decision would lead to a fragmentation of their political camp/voter base which would rob them of potential political power. That's why they say only whitey is an incel, while the rape statistics and the flyers they had to press that teach about sexual consent say the complete opposite. Complete mental gymnastics are required to support Islam, LGBTQ+ rights and womens' rights at the same time when you have even a small amount of vision for the future. @your personality
Yeah, the hypocrisy is strong with leftists. Politicians like Ilhan Omar who adheres to a misogynistic, homophobic goat fucking religion and who came to the US as an immigrant is now afraid of "white male terrorism" as if being white is synonymous with being a terrorist. Even in Europe, especially in Germany, rape cases were brushed under the rug simply because the perpetrators were immigrants (and Muslims). I think it was 2015 were women in Germany were raped in masses on New Year's. What did the German government do? It made it look like a case of a few bad apples. However, in reality most of these people they're importing from God knows where are the scum of the earth. Usually, those are people who are not wanted in their countries or have a criminal record. Even the religions they follow are not compatible with any SJW ideology. Islam is against LGBTQ+, and it is also against feminism. Yet, you have liberal leftist politicians bending over backwards to integrate Islam into the Western society. Their efforts so far have been a colossal failure, as expected.

Consequently, Leftists were left with no other option than to find a scapegoat. You can't blame the immigrants for acting like animals, and you can't blame the Jews. So they put all the blame on whitey. Why are Blacks killing each other? Systemic racism. Why are the Muslims blowing themselves up? white Racism. And so on and so forth. Their entire identity is build on racism - they very thing they claim to be against.

I think this paragraph from Unabomber's manifesto says it best (albeit it's more about how leftists would identify with any minority against whitey rather than they putting the blame on whitey):

"Many leftists have an intense identification with the problems of groups that have an image of being weak (women), defeated (American Indians), repellent (homosexuals) or otherwise inferior. The leftists themselves feel that these groups are inferior. They would never admit to themselves that they have such feelings, but it is precisely because they do see these groups as inferior that they identify with their problems. (We do not mean to suggest that women, Indians, etc.are inferior; we are only making a point about leftist psychology.)"
 
Last edited:
Yeah, the hypocrisy is strong with leftists. Politicians like Ilhan Omar who adheres to a misogynistic, homophobic goat fucking religion and who came to the US as an immigrant is now afraid of "white male terrorism" as if being white is synonymous with being a terrorist. Even in Europe, especially in Germany, rape cases were brushed under the rug simply because the perpetrators were immigrants (and Muslims). I think it was 2015 were women in Germany were raped in masses on New Year's. What did the German government do? It made it look like a case of a few bad apples. However, in reality most of these people they're importing from God knows where are the scum of the earth. Usually, those are people who are not wanted in their countries or have a criminal record. Even they religions they follow are not compatible with any the SJW ideology. Islam is against LGBTQ+, and it is also against feminism. Yet, you have liberal leftist politicians bending over backwards to integrate Islam into the Western society. Their efforts so far have been a colossal failure, as expected.

Consequently, Leftists were left with no other option than to find a scapegoat. You can't the immigrants for acting like animals, and you can't blame the Jews. So they put all the blame on whitey. Why are Blacks killing each other? Systemic racism. Why are the Muslims blowing themselves up? white Racism. And so on and so forth. Their entire identity is build on racism - they very thing they claim to be against.

I think this paragraph from Unabomber's manifesto says it best:

"Many leftists have an intense identification with the problems of groups that have an image of being weak (women), defeated (American Indians), repellent (homosexuals) or otherwise inferior. The leftists themselves feel that these groups are inferior. They would never admit to themselves that they have such feelings, but it is precisely because they do see these groups as inferior that they identify with their problems. (We do not mean to suggest that women, Indians, etc.are inferior; we are only making a point about leftist psychology.)"
Kaczynski understood society massively. Jfl @ people who say that outsiders/excluded individuals cannot come to a conclusion about society out of observations alone - you don't need to be accepted in society to analyse it and you don't need to have been in a relationship to be able to analyse it. An arachnologist will never be a spider or fuck a spider, but still he understands them. Spot on observations by the absolute madlad as always.
 
Kaczynski understood society massively. Jfl @ people who say that outsiders/excluded individuals cannot come to a conclusion about society out of observations alone - you don't need to be accepted in society to analyse it and you don't need to have been in a relationship to be able to analyse it. An arachnologist will never be a or fuck a spider, but still he understands them. Spot on observations by the absolute madlad as always.
I think the isolated/excluded ones understand society the best. They get to observe everything as if they were standing behind a window, watching others live their life. The argument that incels don't understand how women work due to their inability to attract a women is utter nonsense as well. Nowadays, we have a massive amount of information that's easily accessible which we can utilize to almost understand every problem, societal or otherwise. Humans were not here when evolution kicked off, or when the universe started. But with the help of evidence (e.g. the abundance in light elements or the fossil records) we were able to make accurate statements about both theories.

Edit: Kaczynski was ahead of his time tbh. Almost everything he mentioned in his manifesto has happened, and it's more relevant now than it was in the 90s.
 
Last edited:
The thing is that leftist liberalism must do the splits all the time, because it supports every group (except white heterosexual males), when somebody dances on all parties, it dances on no party; when you try to be the right one for everyone you are the right one for nobody in the end. The leftist liberal realises that "We hate whitey" is the only common denominator among these groups, that's why he is so anti-white/focused on hatred against whites.
This is the only thing that keeps the group together, if it wasn't for whitey their interest groups would eat each other, because they have mutually exclusive particular interests in almost everything except the hatred towards whitey - look at muslims and adolescent white women/sexual deviants for example. These are all groups supported by leftist liberalism because they aren't white heterosexual males - but they are polar antitheses of each other, a strict muslim would penalise adultery/sexual deviance and the sexual deviants/adolescent women have in muslims everything they despise due to their focus on tradition/honor/nationalism/family values/discipline/etc. (everything they allegedly hate about whitey).
In the moment they still have whitey as the punching bag and this is the only thing that keeps them from cannibalising each other. Leftist liberalism has no end goal except punching whitey, if whitey wasn't there it would literally completely implode. And this is why they hide non-white incels: They just don't want to see how conflicting/contradictory their ideas are, that the groups they support have mutually exclusive interests. They don't want to be confronted with their entire mess of a world view that is only kept together with le evil whitey as the glue.
That's why they vehemently ignore every evidence of non-white incels, what shouldn't exist doesn't exist. It's better to ignore something like that than to be confronted with a contradiction and a moral dilemma, they would be forced to make a decision and decide to further the interest of only one sacred group (white women or non-white men) otherwise because the interests of these groups are mutually exclusive - that decision would lead to a fragmentation of their political camp/voter base which would rob them of potential political power. That's why they say only whitey is an incel, while the rape statistics and the flyers they had to press that teach about sexual consent say the complete opposite. Complete mental gymnastics are required to support Islam, LGBTQ+ rights and womens' rights at the same time when you have even a small amount of vision for the future. @your personality
Modern liberals (authoritarian left type) don't care, they'll follow in lockstep with whatever the media says as long as they get to feel "righteous" outrage at a particular target. Their belief in how they have the moral highground is so far outdated too. It's not the Bush and Blaire years of the mid 2000s, when conservatives could be shown as uniquely bad and neoliberals hadn't start shoving down woke politics to defend corruption and try to pass off illiberalism as liberalism.
 

Similar threads

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top