D
Agreed. With whitecels It's pretty like Winston in 1984 hoping the proles will rebel. I reckon the whites won't do shit (Feminism + soy + lawfare). It'll be up to the blacks to ignite this revolution.
Agreed. With whitecels It's pretty like Winston in 1984 hoping the proles will rebel. I reckon the whites won't do shit (Feminism + soy + lawfare). It'll be up to the blacks to ignite this revolution.
R
Categorization systems are never perfect. Hispanics are a unique situation in my opinion because many of them are by definition half white. The fact that the American census actually divides Hispanics into "White Hispanics" and "Nonwhite Hispanics" proves this point. The performance of hispanics will thus vary depending on whether you lump them all together.
Middle Eastern men can be quite Mediterranean genetically as they are half way between curries and Southern Europeans. So some Middle Eastern men do well, because they look Italian/Spanish, while others will perform like curries because they look like curries.
Both of these are genetically intermediate cases which can thus only be split out based on their phenotypes.
Lastly, the fact that black men have equally undesirable outcomes in online dating yet have celibacy rates mirroring whites (who are most desirable online) PROVES online and real life can have different outcomes. It is not my opinion. It's simply what the data shows. Again, the fact that blacks sexually outperform their online desirability scores PROVES they are a unique class.
Blacks have so many unique characteristics as we've reviewed. The fact that black women prefer black men in online dating studies, while Asian women hate Asian men, is another unique characteristic.
The terms you want are "white" and "non-white".
R
Personally I don't think there ever will be a revolution. At least not as you're describing. I believe blacks will get aggravated and crime may go up temporarily. We've already seen that rice/currycels can tolerate >30% celibacy without freaking out. In Japan ricemen tolerate even higher celibacy and there is no revolution.
White men are the most prone to soyface and whiteknighting thus I expect they will tolerate it too.
Society will die off with a whimper, not a bang.
Japan and what we're seeing with white men becoming cuckolds and soys en masse should demonstrate that.
What will happen is as male celibacy skyrockets, sex doll technology will advance in parallel and in 15-20 years by the time white male celibacy is hitting those kinds of numbers we'll already have good enough sex dolls they will be commonplace. Men are already being raised from childhood to believe sex is only for the privileged. That indoctrination will continue. People will cope. Reproduction will plummet. And society will die just like Japan is now.
They're also more prone to go ER as a way to commit suicide, even if the actual number is still tiny. However what you have to remember is that the elites don't care about a few shootings, they're not losing enough taxpayers for it to actually matter to society. An increase in the number of people going ER might negatively affect the public consciousness, but I doubt this will do anything more than making things even worse for us.
nobel peace prize is for cucks tbh
No, the date doesn't show this because you don't have data on real life dating to prove this.
That's not how data works AT ALL. I've already cited sources as to WHY the dating numbers and celibacy rates are incongruent, actual scientific studies and reasoning to explain the difference in data. You've done none of that, you've just used one single study as a crutch because you know that no other study backs you up, you know that all you have is a single study and no more whereas I have literally tens of the damn things that prove my point.
You can't make the argument that online dating doesn't reflect desirability. You can make the argument that desirability doesn't reflect celibacy, but that's only claim you CAN make. If you think you can make anymore claims than that, then you don't know how statistics work at all and there's no point having this conversation with someone who can't even get the basics of statistics like that.
R
What data are you even talking about? What data proves black male celibacy is higher or equal to that of ethnics? What data proves ethnic females are fucking at 96%+ rate while ethnic men are sexually starving because of "culture"? What data proves there is any similarity between black and rice/curry men except that they both have low online desirability scores?
Black men have had low celibacy rates for a few reasons that are unique to them:
- Low inhibition and aggressive on average - also why blacks have the highest crime rates.
- Tall and physically dominant - some of the best players in NFL and NBA are black and they can compete in many Olympic sports against whites (unlike curries/rice who can't compete at all physically).
- Celebrated in culture - many top actors/musicians are black.
- Black women state a strong preference for dating black men, while Asian foids state a strong preference NOT to date Asian men.
The NORC GSS is one of the biggest ongoing social surveys in America and its data is unique, because no other social survey is even tackling this issue.
If you want to call all nonwhites "ethnics" no one is going to stop you. Some people do that. You can use whatever definition of that word you want. I just don't think it makes any sense to lump blacks in the same category as rice/curry men.
Last edited:
And poor Trump gets shit on
Similar threads
Users who are viewing this thread
