Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Blackpill Incels aren't a new phenomenon

blackcel

blackcel

BBC
-
Joined
Nov 17, 2017
Posts
4,919
Less than half of men who ever existed did not ever have children. With birth control being a recent thing, one could reasonably surmise that this means most men didn't even have an opportunity to have sex with a woman.


A male who is not a Chad is best off monkmaxxing. Just disregard the idea of sex because you probably aren't going to score anyway.

Of course, with that said, DNA is essentially ancient data. How likely is it for a male in today's world to score? Unfortunately there isn't much data on that due to SJW nonsense focusing on females and assuming every man is some form of sexual predator.
 
Monkmaxxing = NEETmaxxing.
 
This is obscured by the large number of betabux who get sex once a month. For those who do in full (chads) would be less than 10%. And you're an expensive BBC, enjoy it. Not even for "big" women.
 
Monkmaxxing = NEETmaxxing.
NEETs kinda just exist (like most foids). Monks have more of a purpose and I would consider them to be under constant training. It takes no dicipline to be a NEET while a monk's life is all about discipline and self control.
 
back them the dudes reproducing where the smart ones, while the idiots get eaten by tigers and bears, the diference ist hat everything that matter nowdays is facial bones
 
NEETs kinda just exist (like most foids). Monks have more of a purpose and I would consider them to be under constant training. It takes no dicipline to be a NEET while a monk's life is all about discipline and self control.
Tbh I agree. Maybe it's more accurate to say this: all monks are NEETs but not all NEETs are monks. Of course, monks regularly do physical labor but I would consider that wageslaving tbh.

I wish I could be a monk but I'm just too weak.
 
Less than half of men who ever existed did not ever have children. With birth control being a recent thing, one could reasonably surmise that this means most men didn't even have an opportunity to have sex with a woman.


A male who is not a Chad is best off monkmaxxing. Just disregard the idea of sex because you probably aren't going to score anyway.

Of course, with that said, DNA is essentially ancient data. How likely is it for a male in today's world to score? Unfortunately there isn't much data on that due to SJW nonsense focusing on females and assuming every man is some form of sexual predator.
Of course not, inceldom is a natural occurrence that happens if women are allowed to exercise their nature fully and men are cucked enough to suppress theirs. But the solution to inceldom is easy, it's either one of the two:
We agree to start a society with laws and cooperation -> all men get a gf each to have a stake in society
We live naturally without any law-> we just rape every woman we come across
 
In the future only 20% of men will have fathered all of mankind, the remaining 80% didn't make it, their genes couldn't survive tinder and feminism.
 
You strike a valid argument.
 

Similar threads

slapthatsillywilly
Replies
13
Views
234
curryboy420
curryboy420
Scatius Deletus
Replies
14
Views
364
CrackingYs
CrackingYs
Genetics_subhuman
Replies
14
Views
348
BoneHermit666
B

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top