Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Serious Incel revolution megathread

4RAB.GUY

4RAB.GUY

Anti-normies
★★★★★
Joined
Mar 16, 2026
Posts
914
Online time
2d 16h
The incel revolution

How Can a revolution be started ?

Let's take the Arab Spring as an example:
1000000259


On 17 December 2010: Mohamed Bouazizi, a street vendor sets himself on fire following harassment by a municipal officer, sparking protests across Tunisia, later, protests went to other NAfri countries than to the rest of the arab world.
This was the beginning of a series of multinational protests, uprisings, and rebellions across the arab world


What can we conclude from here ?

A multinational revolution started because of someone ropemaxxing, when it comes to the incel revolution, it can most likely start from an incel who ropemaxxed because of the unfair treatment from normies and femoids, it can be a worldwide case if a police officer harrassed him or something (when police are involved the case becomes more popular, remember George floyd ?)

So basically: the incel revolution Can start by someone within our community ropemaxxing.


What kind of revolution do i have in mind ?

In general:
- World wide protests and marches, fighting feminism, hypergamy and wokeness.

We have to divide roles within our community:

High iq incels:
-Preaching against wokeness and feminism with all of their abilities (Books, articles, studies, researches)

- Recruiting blue pilled incels online (through discord servers for exemple)

Other high iq incels
- going to pychiatric hospitals to make our phenomene a serious deal in medical circles

Gymcels:
- Establishing groups that engage in fights with chads and feminists sjw woke counter protesters

- Establishing incels only gyms

Cybercels:
- Hacking and ddos attacks against dating apps, feminist communities, IT type communities etc...

Ropemaxxers:
- i'm against suicide, but if many incels did it we can make their cases popular enough to start this revolution like i said in the beginning

Etc....


Mohamed bouazizi's picture btw:
 

Attachments

  • Mohamed_Bouazizi_2.jpg
    Mohamed_Bouazizi_2.jpg
    14.8 KB · Views: 118
Last edited:
@DJmaxxingMusicCel
 
Bump.

Interpersonal violence would only hurt us by giving us a bad reputation. As much as some members here like Elliot Rodger and however reminds act, interpersonal violence would lead to governments suppressing us. Like Belgiumcuck did.

Men's mental health month is already pseudo-incel activism. We just have to post memes on r/trollcoping and r/hatethismug about romantic nonredemancy.
 
Bump.

Interpersonal violence would only hurt us by giving us a bad reputation. As much as some members here like Elliot Rodger and however reminds act, interpersonal violence would lead to governments suppressing us. Like Belgiumcuck did.

Men's mental health month is already pseudo-incel activism. We just have to post memes on r/trollcoping and r/hatethismug about romantic nonredemancy.
I didn't mention violence
Protests and all these aren't qlways violent, and it's not in our case
 
I didn't mention violence
Protests and all these aren't qlways violent, and it's not in our case
The gymcels and roidcels would have to avoid affiliation with us and keep a offline relationship with us. It would not help us to be associated with beating up wokies.
 
The gymcels and roidcels would have to avoid affiliation with us and keep a offline relationship with us. It would not help us to be associated with beating up wokies.
No we popularise it as self defense, we have to provoke them into starting clashes and fights with us
 
No we popularise it as self defense, we have to provoke them into starting clashes and fights with us
Knowing how much of lolcows women are, this would be easy. Imagine a 44 kg teen feminazi getting her jaw broken by a 118 kilogram roidcel JFL :feelskek:
 
Knowing how much of lolcows women are, this would be easy. Imagine a 44 kg teen feminazi getting her jaw broken by a 118 kilogram roidcel JFL :feelskek:
Feminazis and fags are the easiest ones obviously, but BluePilled chads are a challenge
 
Feminazis and fags are the easiest ones obviously, but BluePilled chads are a challenge
BluePilled chads would go down with medium difficulty.

A manletcel using roids would still fuck up a 7'0 Chad's knee and calf, especially if the manletcel trained Muay Thai or kickboxing.
 
bro this is never happening
 
In all honesty, what did the Arab Spring achieve? At first, there was hope for change, but we are back to square one now.
 
In all honesty, what did the Arab Spring achieve? At first, there was hope for change, but we are back to square one now.
It ended up giving secular Arabs a legacy, and it is taught in schools. It is like a kindling effect where more revolution causes more revolution.

Think about it. In 1848 or so, many revolutions were inspired by eachother.
 
In all honesty, what did the Arab Spring achieve? At first, there was hope for change, but we are back to square one now.
The achievements were temporary

Many muslims had the right to speak freely for example
 
Last edited:
No we popularise it as self defense, we have to provoke them into starting clashes and fights with us
Also, violence can be quiet, not out in the open.
 
@incel_revolution_soon
 
Nathan Larson tried this but nobody cared
 
Bump.

Interpersonal violence would only hurt us by giving us a bad reputation. As much as some members here like Elliot Rodger and however reminds act, interpersonal violence would lead to governments suppressing us. Like Belgiumcuck did.

Men's mental health month is already pseudo-incel activism. We just have to post memes on r/trollcoping and r/hatethismug about romantic nonredemancy.
Women did won rights by terrorism tho
 
The incel revolution

How Can a revolution be started ?

Let's take the Arab Spring as an example:
View attachment 1740809

On 17 December 2010: Mohamed Bouazizi, a street vendor sets himself on fire following harassment by a municipal officer, sparking protests across Tunisia, later, protests went to other NAfri countries than to the rest of the arab world.
This was the beginning of a series of multinational protests, uprisings, and rebellions across the arab world


What can we conclude from here ?

A multinational revolution started because of someone ropemaxxing, when it comes to the incel revolution, it can most likely start from an incel who ropemaxxed because of the unfair treatment from normies and femoids, it can be a worldwide case if a police officer harrassed him or something (when police are involved the case becomes more popular, remember George floyd ?)

So basically: the incel revolution Can start by someone within our community ropemaxxing.


What kind of revolution do i have in mind ?

In general:
- World wide protests and marches, fighting feminism, hypergamy and wokeness.

We have to divide roles within our community:

High iq incels:
-Preaching against wokeness and feminism with all of their abilities (Books, articles, studies, researches)

- Recruiting blue pilled incels online (through discord servers for exemple)

Other high iq incels
- going to pychiatric hospitals to make our phenomene a serious deal in medical circles

Gymcels:
- Establishing groups that engage in fights with chads and feminists sjw woke counter protesters

- Establishing incels only gyms

Cybercels:
- Hacking and ddos attacks against dating apps, feminist communities, IT type communities etc...

Ropemaxxers:
- i'm against suicide, but if many incels did it we can make their cases popular enough to start this revolution like i said in the beginning

Etc....


Mohamed bouazizi's picture btw:
The problem is not that it’s impossible, the problem is that it is possible and easy but no one wants to do that
 

Attachments

  • IMG_1450.jpeg
    IMG_1450.jpeg
    71.9 KB · Views: 15
Nothing ever happens
 
And do the US and others not want male labor? Yet:
Indeed, they simply didn't want male labor to make up most of their employment base because it was more expensive. Otoh, women would tolerate bad working conditions (until working time limits were equalized) and continue working alongside the machinery. Women didn't basically say "let's bomb London and gain rights"
 
Indeed, they simply didn't want male labor to make up most of their employment base because it was more expensive. Otoh, women would tolerate bad working conditions (until working time limits were equalized) and continue working alongside the machinery. Women didn't basically say "let's bomb London and gain rights"
Nah they did indeed just go out and say “let’s bomb London” that is a historical fact

They are as terrorist as Islam or even perhaps more, do you condemn their actions?
 
Nah they did indeed just go out and say “let’s bomb London” that is a historical fact

They are as terrorist as Islam or even perhaps more, do you condemn their actions?
You didn't address what I've said about how women gained rights, likewise I am not even sure if you know anything about the event itself other than it being a bombing campaign.
 
You didn't address what I've said about how women gained rights, likewise I am not even sure if you know anything about the event itself other than it being a bombing campaign.
So you defend a bombing campaign? Or do you condemn it.


And I think it is not true America wanted more workforce so they gave rights to women because now they don’t mind losing 50% workforce that is male, so, all of these theories like “muh Industrial Revolution” show correlation but not causation, as in the times of farming rather more women have worked than after Industrial Revolution because in general in rural areas women work in farms, while in the early cities only men worked, so I don’t think it was so very economically necessary to push women into workforce.


As for the bombing campaigns again, you say voting rights are enough of an excuse to do that? Why don’t children and mentally ill then bomb cities to gain voting rights if according to you the method is so good
 
We won one before
 
So you defend a bombing campaign? Or do you condemn it.


And I think it is not true America wanted more workforce so they gave rights to women because now they don’t mind losing 50% workforce that is male, so, all of these theories like “muh Industrial Revolution” show correlation but not causation, as in the times of farming rather more women have worked than after Industrial Revolution because in general in rural areas women work in farms, while in the early cities only men worked, so I don’t think it was so very economically necessary to push women into workforce.


As for the bombing campaigns again, you say voting rights are enough of an excuse to do that? Why don’t children and mentally ill then bomb cities to gain voting rights if according to you the method is so good
You don't make any sense, is your argument from incredulity?
 
You don't make any sense, is your argument from incredulity?
My argument is that it is a myth that Industrial Revolution caused feminism, because it rather caused the opposite, by barring these women who worked in farms from any work at all, so, it is a corellation

Because women accessed the damn TNT and blew things up, fucking terrorist animals
 
My argument is that it is a myth that Industrial Revolution caused feminism, because it rather caused the opposite, by barring these women who worked in farms from any work at all, so, it is a corellation

Because women accessed the damn TNT and blew things up, fucking terrorist animals
First things first, women bombed places but didn't exclusively intend to kill a single soul (with few deaths happening). Of course this didn't help suffragettes and give a higher moral ground for authorities.

I'll argue against your idea that industrial revolution caused to work solely. Records from 1833 show that girls and women made up more than half of the total number of factory workers in cotton, flax, silk and paper manufacturing in the UK. Overall, girls and women totalled nearly 57% of factory workforces. It is true that feminism wasn't introduced by industrial revolution but rather enlightenment and its ideas, albeit with latter providing the groundwork.
 
First things first, women bombed places but didn't exclusively intend to kill a single soul (with few deaths happening). Of course this didn't help suffragettes and give a higher moral ground for authorities.

I'll argue against your idea that industrial revolution caused to work solely. Records from 1833 show that girls and women made up more than half of the total number of factory workers in cotton, flax, silk and paper manufacturing in the UK. Overall, girls and women totalled nearly 57% of factory workforces. It is true that feminism wasn't introduced by industrial revolution but rather enlightenment and its ideas, albeit with latter providing the groundwork.
I will report you to the CIA you feminist terrorist
 

Similar threads

4RAB.GUY
Replies
20
Views
702
INVERTER
INVERTER
yakusai
Replies
9
Views
1K
SewerPolarKoala
SewerPolarKoala
tryingtobenormal
Replies
34
Views
2K
SewerPolarKoala
SewerPolarKoala
Misogynist Vegeta
Replies
37
Views
2K
Pikacel
Pikacel
SilverBullet
Replies
15
Views
1K
HyperboreanCavalier
HyperboreanCavalier

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top
×
Sponsored
Stake.us
America's #1 Social Casino
Slots, Poker & More
Join Now →