Classic_Jarvis
Recruit
★★★★★
- Joined
- Dec 31, 2017
- Posts
- 452
This fish is no fucking beauty. The angler deep-water fish is the basement dweller among fish. Plenty of fish in the sea, but this one doesn't mingle with the rest, because even by fish standards he is fucking ugly.
Yet, there is one important lesson it can teach us all.
The Horrors of Anglerfish Mating
The specimens that they were working with were all female, and they had no idea where the males were or what they looked like. Researchers sometimes found some other fish that seemed to be related based on their body structure, but they lacked the fearsome maw and lure typical of ceratioids and were much smaller—sometimes only as long as six or seven millimeters—and got placed into separate taxonomic groups.
It wasn’t until the 1920s—almost a full century after the first ceratioid was entered into the scientific record—that things started to become a little clearer. In 1922, Icelandic biologist Bjarni Saemundsson discovered a female ceratioid with two of these smaller fish attached to her belly by their snouts. He assumed it was a mother and her babies, but was puzzled by the arrangement.
“I can form no idea of how, or when, the larvae, or young, become attached to the mother. I cannot believe that the male fastens the egg to the female,” he wrote. “This remains a puzzle for some future researchers to solve.”
When Saemundsson kicked the problem down the road, it was Charles Tate Regan, working at the British Museum of Natural History in 1924, who picked it up. Regan also found a smaller fish attached to a female ceratioid. When he dissected it, he realized it wasn’t a different species or the female angler’s child. It was her mate.
The “missing” males had been there all along, just unrecognized and misclassified, and Regan and other scientists, like Norwegian zoologist Albert Eide Parr, soon figured out why the male ceratioids looked so different. They don’t need lures or big mouths and teeth because they don’t hunt, and they don’t hunt because they have the females. The ceratioid male, Regan wrote, is “merely an appendage of the female, and entirely dependent on her for nutrition.” In other words, a parasite.
When ceratioid males go looking for love, they follow a species-specific pheromone to a female, who will often aid their search further by flashing her bioluminescent lure. Once the male finds a suitable mate, he bites into her belly and latches on until his body fuses with hers. Their skin joins together, and so do their blood vessels, which allows the male to take all the nutrients he needs from his host/mate’s blood. The two fish essentially become one.
I believe that this primitive fish's mating ritual is an example of what sex should be about.
Two individuals in love with another are supposed to become one for the remainder of the lives. Sex should not be a form of self-gratification, but a means to have male offspring and a spiritual union. The sexual bond between a man and a woman is supposed to be something monogamous, lasting and sacredly intimate. I believe that casual sex, pump-n'-dump, roasties sleeping around is degrading and unnatural, leads to divorced couples and traumatized children.
This is the bonding @ItheIthe is talking about. For the angelfish, the first sex is the only sex.