
four1298
⚠️This User is a Registered Incel
★
- Joined
- Dec 27, 2023
- Posts
- 510
I think some people say something along the lines that prison labor is slavery because they are paid very little, possibly compared to slave wages. Speaking of which why is slavery even wrong? Today there's this thing called WWOOF. Google says, "No, WWOOF (World Wide Opportunities on Organic Farms) does not pay WWOOFers. It's a non-monetary exchange where volunteers work on organic farms in exchange for food and accommodation." Isn't that what slavery was? Slaves were paid fairly in the form of housing, food, and medical care and they were taken care of in infancy and old age according to George Fitzhugh. WWOOF is like voluntary slavery. Of course, it's ridiculous to say slavery is wrong or that things are bad like slavery. It's like saying being a housewife is wrong because she's not paid for cooking, cleaning, and looking after the kiddos. Women under patriarchy actually thrive. They have longer life expectancies and sure that may be due to biology or other reasons, but if patriarchy was so bad, wouldn't it have made women worse at everything? Another example of the benevolence of patriarchy is marriage is associated with happiness. Bryan Caplan says, "People with kids are more likely to be older, married, and churchgoing. All three traits—age, marriage, church attendance—predict greater happiness. Once you adjust for these patterns, happiness falls as the number of children rises." Again churches prop up patriarchy and they make women happier. Men too. Feminists try to pin womyn against men, but with patriarchy both win. With feminism, both men and women lose. As The Guardian says, "Since the 70s, women in the US and Europe have reported feeling less satisfied with their lives." Feminism has failed at satisfying women, yet soyciety keep pushing for it. I'm going to disagree with Caplan that children cause unhappiness because whenever my dad talks to his three year old daughter, he smiles. And yes he's old, married, and a churchgoer, but even when he's apart from his wife and church he still smiles when he talks to her. I also remember hearing that the idea of "pursuit of happiness" refers to having children, but I can't find the link to that at the moment. I'd need to search the Wayback archives for that and it'd take a while. Anywho, Fitzhugh defended slavery - and rightfully so. To bring slavery back would Make America Great Again. That would truly do it unlike the timid things Donald Trump is doing. I do agree we need to make America White again and immigration is a problem, so in that area I do tip my hat off to Trump. Cuckservatives like Candace Owens blame slavery on the Democrats. What they fail to tell you is that the South(eastern USA) was the bulwark of slavery. The South votes Republican today. As John McCain's daughter said, "America was always great." This includes when slavery flourished. And by that extension slaves flourished. Indeed, slavery is the best thing for Blacks and really any woman of any race. A cuckservative like Trump isn't brave enough to condemn 13th amendment that legalized slavery and Abraham Lincoln. He is betraying the South that voted for him. What I support is Barry Goldwater Republicans. He opposed the Civil Rights Act of 1964. I think Republican Ron Paul also voiced opposition to it. That's the only form of Republicanism I can endorse. That's what Trump should be like. I don't want to conserve the status quo - I'm not a conservative, I'm a reactionary. Back to Fitzhugh, he defended slavery because it provided for slaves. I don't know if he talked about it, but prison is similar to slavery. Prison provides everything to inmates. He may have defended prisons if he were alive today. There was one of the few true blue Republicans, Jim Wheeler, that said he would support slavery if his constituency did. That's the sort of man who should be President. And of course only White Men should be allowed to be President. Some cuckservatives are not brave enough to admit it and instead say "Obama was Kenyan and shouldn't be president." That's true but also look at his black skin - he's inferior. They're too timid to say the n-word. He's supposed to be a slave, not a leader. It's a clown world that Blacks have any rights whatsoever. I still do prefer Trump over Kamala Harris because she's a pajeeta. He's betrayed the middle class a lot by allowing more pajeets. We literally voted against pajeetism by not voting for her yet Trump betrays us by supporting H-1B pajeets. India should be nuked because it's not Christian. We need to put pajeets into concentration camps - and soon. They stole our technology jobs. I also prefer Trump to Clinton because she's a woman. A woman's place is in the home. I would always prefer a George Wallace Democrat over a cuckservative Republican. As he said, "segregation now, segregation tomorrow, segregation forever."
Last edited: