Soying down every male and masculinizing every woman, to an extreme degree would eliminate most gender problems. You'd also have to like... have artificial wombs and shit. Which seems like a weird thing to talk about. But this is literally what radical feminists like shumalith firestone and many other radical feminists explicitly had in mind. Although, they wanted women to control the artificial wombs, but there's no reason not to make equal the control of the artificial wombs against the radical feminist's desires.
The favorite philosopher of late 2010's incels:
Otto Weininger argued that in humans, the less sexually dimorphic the genders, the less of a problem female sexual liberation becomes. Whereas, if there is high sexual dimorphism in humans, female sexual liberation leads to agitation, domestic abuse against husbands, and rampant female expressions of vanity and male-attention-seeking in traditional male spaces.
The problem is that sexually liberated women naturally promote sexual dimorphism, as seen in apps like Tinder. So obviously, freeing the sexual marketplace isn't the first step to a free sexual market without civilizational decline. In order to establish women a free sexual market peacefully, if such a thing were desirable, first attention should be paid to reducing sexual dimorphism or sex differences, even if that means reducing female sexual choice temporarily. If such a change were made permanent, and there was very little sexual dimorphism between the sexes, to the point of almost not being able to distinguish between the sexes, female sexual liberation would probably not lead to civilizational decline, or at least the kind that we see now.
