blackbabooneykiller
Anti-hedonistic-utilitarian DESTROYER
★
- Joined
- Aug 14, 2024
- Posts
- 1,043
Im going to be the first human being on dying of boredom
I explained multiple times my shit yet you misrepresent it. Also i never said such thing'anything that feels good is good and should be done repeatedly' -you frequently, before anhedonia makes you rope in 2 years time
i didn't misrepresent it, that was literally the title, and the contents of the thread we're both speaking aboutI explained multiple times my shit yet you misrepresent it. Also i never said such thing
i don't get how you have confidence in your thoughts when you're so mind numbingly stupid your own posts contradict one anotherI explained multiple times my shit yet you misrepresent it. Also i never said such thing
you are confusing hedonism with folk hedonism. im not going to explain philosophic shit im not no ones teacheri don't get how you have confidence in your thoughts when you're so mind numbingly stupid your own posts contradict one another
'i am a hedonist and anti hedonists are cucked'
'im bored with all my games'
JFL
if i were you i'd just type out those thoughts, realize they were stupid and delete them, yet you subject others to your retarded opinions
i am not even anti hedonist, you just have no clue how adaptation works
Pleasure is intrinsically good. Pain is intrinsically bad. This is the hedonist philosophy. Argue back if you disagree.
Im going to be the first human being on dying of boredom
im so fucking bored of all the games
When the term “hedonism” is used in modern literature, or by non-philosophers in their everyday talk, its meaning is quite different from the meaning it takes when used in the discussions of philosophers. Non-philosophers tend to think of a hedonist as a person who seeks out pleasure for themselves without any particular regard for their own future well-being or for the well-being of others. According to non-philosophers, then, a stereotypical hedonist is someone who never misses an opportunity to indulge of the pleasures of sex, drugs, and rock ‘n’ roll, even if the indulgences are likely to lead to relationship problems, health problems, regrets, or sadness for themselves or others. Philosophers commonly refer to this everyday understanding of hedonism as “Folk Hedonism.” Folk Hedonism is a rough combination of Motivational Hedonism, Hedonistic Egoism, and a reckless lack of foresight.
Hedonistic Utilitarianism is the theory that the right action is the one that produces (or is most likely to produce) the greatest net happiness for all concerned. Hedonistic Utilitarianism is often considered fairer than Hedonistic Egoism because the happiness of everyone involved (everyone who is affected or likely to be affected) is taken into account and given equal weight. Hedonistic Utilitarians, then, tend to advocate not stealing from needy orphans because to do so would usually leave the orphan far less happy and the (probably better-off) thief only slightly happier (assuming he felt no guilt). Despite treating all individuals equally, Hedonistic Utilitarianism is still seen as objectionable by some because it assigns no intrinsic moral value to justice, friendship, truth, or any of the many other goods that are thought by some to be irreducibly valuable. For example, a Hedonistic Utilitarian would be morally obliged to publicly execute an innocent friend of theirs if doing so was the only way to promote the greatest happiness overall. Although unlikely, such a situation might arise if a child was murdered in a small town and the lack of suspects was causing large-scale inter-ethnic violence. Some philosophers argue that executing an innocent friend is immoral precisely because it ignores the intrinsic values of justice, friendship, and possibly truth.
Hedonistic Utilitarianism is rarely endorsed by philosophers, but mainly because of its reliance on Prudential Hedonism as opposed to its utilitarian element. Non-hedonistic versions of utilitarianism are about as popular as the other leading theories of right action, especially when it is the actions of institutions that are being considered.
you can claim that but your own words contradict itPleasure is intrinsically good. Pain is intrinsically bad. This is the hedonist philosophy. Argue back if you disagree.
Im aware of hedonic treadmill tolerance etc. Neuroscience stuff. Im just saying im bored because my pleasure receptors are fried. but my philosophy is hedonistic utilitarianismalso you won't be the first because if you knew a shred of philosophy you'd know humans adapt to their surroundings and this has been written about for thousands of years
It is not a lie what i said. Pleasure is intrinsically good and pain intrinsically bad.you can claim that but your own words contradict it
Im aware of hedonic treadmill tolerance etc. Neuroscience stuff. Im just saying im bored because my pleasure receptors are fried. but my philosophy is hedonistic utilitarianism
make a single comment on this contradiction before you reply againPleasure is intrinsically good. Pain is intrinsically bad. This is the hedonist philosophy. Argue back if you disagree.
so you're aware of the hedonistic treadmill, your pleasure receptors are fried, you admit both of these things, you're bored of all your games, and funnily enough your philosophy isn't actually hedonistic utilitarianism because you don't care about other peoples hedony and only ever post about yourself. And you think there is nothing wrong with the idea that pleasure is intrinsically good. What a fucking giant retard I can't believe you can't admit you are stupid. Oh wait yes I can believe that. Because you're prioritizing not looking dumb on the internet over actually being correct, which is something copers do. Lmao.It is not a lie what i said. Pleasure is intrinsically good and pain intrinsically bad.
Im aware of hedonic treadmill tolerance etc. Neuroscience stuff. Im just saying im bored because my pleasure receptors are fried. but my philosophy is hedonistic utilitarianism
It is not a contradiction. The fact that pleasure is intrinsically good and pain is intrinsically bad doesnt contradict that the human brain is designed in a way you cant get pleasure surplus.make a single comment on this contradiction before you reply again
i'll lay this out very simply for your walnut brain: Pleasure cannot be intrinsically good if you're admitting it fried your dopamine receptors to the point you can't even find a game you find enjoyable. That means abusing pleasure led to something bad. In your own life.It is not a contradiction. The fact that pleasure is intrinsically good and pain is intrinsically bad doesnt contradict that the human brain is designed in a way you cant get pleasure surplus.
Holy shit im not going to a fucking formal logical arguement. I was trying to engage with you respectfully yet you come and insult me calling me retard etc. You can go fuck yourself anti hedonistic scum hopefully shot by a firing squad of 12 gauge mossbergs pointing at your abdomen to cut you in half, in arma 3.so you're aware of the hedonistic treadmill, your pleasure receptors are fried, you admit both of these things, you're bored of all your games, and funnily enough your philosophy isn't actually hedonistic utilitarianism because you don't care about other peoples hedony and only ever post about yourself. And you think there is nothing wrong with the idea that pleasure is intrinsically good. What a fucking giant retard I can't believe you can't admit you are stupid. Oh wait yes I can believe that. Because you're prioritizing not looking dumb on the internet over actually being correct, which is something copers do. Lmao.
i agree, your logic is bad.Holy shit im not going to a fucking formal logical arguement.
Again insulting. get fucking shot by a firing squad you fucking scumbag.i'll lay this out very simply for your walnut brain: Pleasure cannot be intrinsically good if you're admitting it fried your dopamine receptors to the point you can't even find a game you find enjoyable. That means abusing pleasure led to something bad. In your own life.
You simply refuse to be wrong on the internet because it would hurt your feelings
Again insulting. get fucking shot by a firing squad you fucking scumbag.
Pleasure cannot be intrinsically good if you're admitting it fried your dopamine receptors to the point you can't even find a game you find enjoyable. That means abusing pleasure led to something bad. In your own life.
you're simultaneously ignoring the point and insulting me because i proved you wrong
Thats a logical fallacy called Ad silentio. im not going to engage more with scum so get lostcould you be more of a hypocrite
are you saying you committed that fallacy because that's what I said you did, you ignored my point. Meanwhile I engaged every one of your arguments, lolThats a logical fallacy called Ad silentio. im not going to engage more with scum so get lost
Yeahwell, this thread was interesting xD
I am taking a breakHow about try some new genres of games? Or even return to something like Arcade games Mame/Teknoparrot can play a lot of them now.
Get the fuck out of your comfort and try new games with emulator if you don't want to spend money play games like persona or smt 4Im going to be the first human being on dying of boredom