Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Blackpill I'm not gonna lie, men who can't understand why DICKPILL is one of the worst pills are extremely embarrassing.

Yeah I agree I just said it like that because I’m responding to two different threads at once. Like they don’t correlate, but it’s not gunna help me in my situation. Dick pill is irrelevant when you are below 5’9 anyway.

I’m just saying nigga should’ve kept his height silent he could’ve grifted for better attention if he had done so jfl
Yeah
 
Yes i’d rather be tall with a tiny dick than be short with a big one
Exactly wtf. Imagine the scenario of being tall and expected to have a big dick and pulling out a shrimp. Now imagine the opposite scenario where you pull out a massive tree trunk when you were expected to have a small one due to being short.
 
Exactly wtf. Imagine the scenario of being tall and expected to have a big dick and pulling out a shrimp. Now imagine the opposite scenario where you pull out a massive tree trunk when you were expected to have a small one due to being short.
you will never get to the point of showing the dick to a foid because you are too ugly and or stupid and or neurodivergent and or mentally ill i am tired of hearing about the stupid dick pill
 
Yeah I would too but 3 incher is still brutal lmfao
Wouldn’t have mattered as long as big frame exists he could’ve grifted for just a dick pump and dick pumped maxxxed.
 
you will never get to the point of showing the dick to a foid because you are too ugly and or stupid and or neurodivergent and or mentally ill i am tired of hearing about the stupid dick pill
 
Height,Face, NT, Dick size all matter
I'm black and i'm from atlanta georgia so dick size is extremely important.
 
you will never get to the point of a foid seeing your dick because you are ugly and or autistic and mentally ill
True the dickpill isn't the most major issue for incels but it still effects other Men.
 
The dickpill is not more important than height nigger. So you’re saying that you would rather be 5’4 with an 8 inch dick than a 6’5 guy with a 3 incher? What an absolutely horrid take.
TBF... in the college I went to there was this maybe 5'5 with a chad face (I'm 5'4 I estimate him around 5'5), he had a stacy gf who was around 5'1...
so if you really have a chad 10/10 face then yes I'd take the former option.

But best is a compromise something in between what you said. 6 foot, 6 inches
 
Exactly wtf. Imagine the scenario of being tall and expected to have a big dick and pulling out a shrimp. Now imagine the opposite scenario where you pull out a massive tree trunk when you were expected to have a small one due to being short.
I do agree that it sounds bad but im sure your height would compensate for your tiny dick. The problem is that having a big dick can only take you so far and it only matters when it comes to having sex with a woman, whereas height matters so much more in life, being tall affects who respects you, who finds you attractive, your confidence, etc.
 
True the dickpill isn't the most major issue for incels but it still effects other Men.
in my humble opinion its irrelevant to any true incel
 
in my humble opinion its irrelevant to any true incel
irrelevant is a stretch as even as an incel i'd rather have a Big penis than a small penis.
 
you will never get to the point of showing the dick to a foid because you are too ugly and or stupid and or neurodivergent and or mentally ill i am tired of hearing about the stupid dick pill
 
TBF... in the college I went to there was this maybe 5'5 with a chad face (I'm 5'4 I estimate him around 5'5), he had a stacy gf who was around 5'1...
so if you really have a chad 10/10 face then yes I'd take the former option.

But best is a compromise something in between what you said. 6 foot, 6 inches
I was looking at it as if both guys in this hypothetical were normies (5/10 ) since having a chad face at 165cm is very rare.

Though I’d also choose the former if it meant i was a chad
 
irrelevant is a stretch as even as an incel i'd rather have a Big penis than a small penis.
prostitutes prefer smaller dicks btw

its easier for them
 
The more I hear about dick talk the more I'm convinced there are a percentage of members here who are closeted homos.
 
The more I hear about dick talk the more I'm convinced there are a percentage of members here who are closeted homos.
trvth nvke

finally somebody told that
 
I was looking at it as if both guys in this hypothetical were normies (5/10 ) since having a chad face at 165cm is very rare.
Yeah that makes sense.

I'm from Europe btw. Maybe a higher percentage of manlets here has a chad face here in Europe compared to in the USA.

Though I’d also choose the former if it meant i was a chad
Same.
 
Interesting
i have spoken to some of them in english and they prefer smaller dicks its easier on them

niggers rejected due to bbc
 
Last edited:
dickpill-saint-lastgerman-jpg.1657239

Ascending with a small penis is a physical impossibility, because sex with a small penis is not sex. Coitus is only possible with a big penis. There is no pleasure for either the woman or the man with the small penis. This means that proper masturbation is not possible with a small penis either, because there is no physical pleasure. The only sexual pleasure a man with a small penis can get is from his imagination, and some can not even muster that. What we were set here to do in life is to have coitus, it is the pinnacle of life. Because of that the penis is effectively the entirety of a man's being, because nothing defines him more. The penis is called one's "manhood" for a reason, every other stat is just a bonus. Even with otherwise truecel stats a big penis is enough to ascend you. There are of course exceptions but those merely reinforce the rule and their lives still mog dickcel's lives, @MoroccanFarmer once summarised it well:
Men with big penises that only masturbate and are not having sex are more satifsied with their sexual life than men with small penises that are having sex daily.
Being a dickcel is a torturous existence to say the least. The penis pill always collects.
These questions such as "I never understood dickpill! Why care if you're an incel anyways and you'd never use it?" You would expect only a female to ask questions or make insinuations like this because it's a question only a fucking foid should ask with genuine sincerity because she doesn't have one and has Penis Envy (shoutout Alfred Kinsey). You are a basically troon for asking this question or insinuating it's not important without even realizing it. To be completely honest, it's probably a good thing that you're an incel because if you were to have a son, he'd suffer in this world because his father doesn't understand why it's important for him to have the body of a winner in a capitalist world that expects WINNERS.
The reality is that everyone knows the dickpill to be true, but they get a sadistic kick out of denying the dickpill and trolling dickcels (as well as a sweet ego boost, if they themselves have big penises). Every other major pill except the dickpill is protected on this site. You are not allowed to deny the heightpill or brag about being tall on this site, for example, plenty of people have gotten banned for that but such is not the case for the dickpill. They do not even have a single argument against it, all they say time and time again is that it "does not matter", even though "size doesn't matter" is the biggest bluepill lie ever told. Size matters, there is no concept as easily and widely understood as "bigger is better". There is no such thing as a penis that is too big either, because women were made to birth children.

There is an old saying that goes "never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity" but when it comes to anti-dickpillers you have to flip that saying on its head to maintain your sanity, i.e. "never attribute to stupidity that which is adequately explained by malice". The reason these people say these things does not come from any kind of intellectual curiosity or intent for an honest debate, because if it did they would have something more to say than simply "it doesn't matter" and a bunch of insults towards dickcels and dickpillers. Make no mistake, these users are coming from a place of malice. There are plenty of otherwise respectable users who take joy in the suffering of dickcels.
A problem exists:
1. it's taboo to be an owner of the problem

Bingo? Lets just dedicate our resources to solve the problem right.
Exactly. There is a massive disparity (not healthy variety, unlike what bluepill gaslighters want you to believe) in penis sizes that needs to be corrected. Unfortunately current widespread penis enlargement techniques will turn your penis into an unuseable abomination, stay far away from them. It's important that you have a penis that works properly, even if it is still small, because if you lose that you will lose all of your humanity. The only potential solution for dickcels would be something like a patent involving Relaxin @LastGerman discovered:
Although, there is actually one solution to it. It is a patent and it actually does work. It does not only add half of an inch. It adds much more than that permanently. It adds 2 inches, 3 inches, even 4 inches. It adds a lot to girth as well. It also works regardless of age. I am not even joking. This actually is a solution, yet nobody talks about it. No physician, no biologist. It is also difficult to even find that. It is like, it is hidden somewhere in some archives in the Internet. They really could make a lot of money from it but they do not. This is why I know that it is not about money. It is like they really do not want to fix that. This is why I think that it is by design. It is on purpose. I will make a thread about it.

This is not some DHT application that you put on the penis. It is more elaborate than that. First, let us go briefly over it:
  • SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
  • [0007]
    In a first aspect, this invention provides a pharmaceutical vasodilator which induces a cumulative prolonged engorgement of a human penis, optionally as a composition together with a pharmaceutically-acceptable diluent or carrier, for use in causing a permanent increase in size of the human penis. As explained in greater detail below, the permanent increase in size is achieved by repeated use of the vasodilator or composition thereof, say, once a day for a few days a week over many weeks, possibly many months.
  • [0008]
    In accordance with another aspect of this invention, there is provided a method of enhancing penis size by administering said vasodilator or composition thereof so as to induce a cumulative prolonged engorgement of the penis. According to the method, such an administration lasts for a limited time during one day, and is repeated up to daily or a few days a week over a period of several weeks.
  • [0009]
    Thus, in one aspect the invention provides a method for causing a permanent increase in the length and girth of a male subject's penis, said method comprising treatment comprising the step of a (a) administering to said patient an effective amount of a vasodilator selected from the group consisting of a vasodilator per se and compositions thereof comprising a pharmaceutically-acceptable diluent or carrier, to induce a cumulative prolonged engorgement of the subject's penis; and (b) repeating step (a) as necessary to cause said increase during said treatment.

Causing permanent increase in the length and girth.

Let us go into it to what they actually did and what they used. This is one of the most prominent example:
  • EXAMPLE 1
  • [0080]
    A male patient, age 41, was treated with intracavernosal injections of a vasodilator, prostaglandin E1, on a regular basis (approximately four to five times per week) over an 18 month treatment period. A sufficient quantity was administered to maintain a prolonged engorgement of an erectile response between 40-75% over a period of several hours, generally 3 to 6 hours. The quantity of medication was adjusted from time to time in accordance with the patient's response, which was monitored at least weekly.
  • [0081]
    The size of the patient's fully erect penis increased from 5.8 inches to 8.6 inches in length (about an 48% increase) and 3.7 inches to 5.8 inches in girth (about an 56% increase) over the 18-month treatment period. Following the discontinuation of this treatment, the erect penis length remained stable for two years at over 8½ inches. Treatment was re-institued combining intracavernosal injections 3-4 times per week of a mixture of testosterone (0.5 mg) and vasodilators with low dose oral Potaba (500-1000 mg) 3-4 times per day. After a short treatment period of 2½ months, the patient's erect penis was over 9 inches in length, which means he has gained an additional 0.4-0.5 inches in length (about an 6% increase). The total increase in length was therefore about 3.2 inches (about an 55% increase) in length.

First he went from 5.8 inches to 8.6 inches. Ultimately, he ended up having a penis that is over 9 inches. I think we really do have the solution right here.

@TooSomething @AdolfRizzler
It is indeed brutal. There is a solution for this. With that we are able to gain 4 inches.

It is found as a patent on Google.

Penis Enlargement​

Abstract​

A method for causing a permanent increase in the length and girth of a male subject's penis, the method comprising treatment comprising the step of (a) administering to the male an effective amount of a vasodilator selected from the group consisting of a vasodilator per se and compositions thereof comprising a pharmaceutically-acceptable diluent or carrier, to induce a cumulative prolonged engorgement of the subject's penis; and (b) repeating step (a) as necessary to cause the increase during the treatment. A potentiator which enhances the effect of the vasodilator may also be used.

Classifications​

A61K38/2221 Relaxins
View 5 more classifications

US20100112027A1​


Status

Abandoned


Unfortunately it has been abandoned. Yet we do have a solution right here. They could have utilised it. They could have made money off of it, but they did not do it. This is why I think it is not about money. This again just confirms what I have been thinking the whole time. I think it is by design. It is on purpose.

Relaxin is an important key here. Relaxin is a master hormone:
  • [0055]
    Relaxin directly and indirectly triggers a cascade of complex biochemical and cellular effects that can cause general morphological changes to genitalia. Prostaglandins such as prostaglandin F2 alpha and prostaglandin E2 have similar effects. This invention includes the mediators of these cascades as potentiators.
  • [0056]
    Collagen is a component of the extracellular matrix (ECM), which is a dynamic entity with many other components (e.g., proteoglycans, fibronectin, elastin, laminin, etc.) that functions as a storage reservoir for cytokines and enzymes and interacts intimately with surrounding cells to provide a structural scaffold and an efficient biochemical communication network within tissues. Enzymes primarily responsible for ECM remodeling are the Matrix MetalloProteinases (MMPs), which break down ECM components, and the Tissue Inhibitors of Matrix MetalloProteinases (TIMPs). Maintenance of a balance of ECM synthesis and MMP/TIMP activity in tissues is required for normal homeostasis; imbalances will generally lead to diseases or developmental problems such as scleroderma, periodontal disease, restenosis, osteoarthritis, liver cirrhosis, glomerulonephritis, and ulceration.
  • [0057]
    Relaxin is a 6 kDa peptide hormone that is structurally similar to insulin; the prohormone form consists of B-C-A chains (20 kDa), and the C chain is proteolytically excised in ‘mature’ relaxin. However, unlike many other pro-hormones, pro-relaxin retains its biological activity. The profile of conserved amino acid sequences among various species such as pig, human, whale, porpoise, and shark suggests that relaxin is an ancient hormone with a unique molecular evolutionary history. The most recognized effect of relaxin on target cells is induction of MMP expression and inhibition of collagen synthesis.
  • [0058]
    Historically, relaxin has been classified as a “pregnancy hormone” that acts on reproductive tissues only during pregnancy, preparing the female for parturition by “relaxing” the pelvic ligaments and tendons. However, recent evidence suggests that relaxin may be classified as a “master hormone” that also induces biochemical changes in a number of non-reproductive tissues. In addition to up-regulating MMP expression in reproductive tissues such as the cervix and placenta relaxin up-regulates expression of MMP-1 and MMP-3 in lung fibroblasts, skin fibroblasts, and fibrocartilaginous cells. Relaxin receptors are found in the brain heart, skin, nipples, small intestine, mammary gland, blood vessels, and testes. The bioactivity of relaxin is unique when compared with other cytokines that affect ECM remodeling.

It is not only a pregnancy hormone. It is much more thant this. We also do create Relaxin. Relaxin is the key.
The only other solution would be selective breeding where only men with big penises and women whose father and etc had a big penis would get to breed, in order to aid genetic recombination with children who meet the bare minimum requirement that is 7 inches:
It is unfortunately very unlikely that we ever see the small penis problem solved, because normies (and even fellow incels) take such pleasure in torturing dickcels. The supposed "average" is a great example of this:
I know Calcsd. I went over this in other posts. It also uses the so called "average" based on the study from 2015 which is faulty. I also went over this in multiple other posts as well.



It is absolute disparity.


I just want to briefly elaborate in general:
The numbers there are off as usual and then they use a distribution to show those numbers in percentile. I really despise "studies" and "data". They use it in order to justify their "average" which they created based on sampling bias. This is also found in their references. They specifically targeted men who and I paraphrase "are insecure about their penis size". This is a clear sampling bias. Only very few of the participants were actually measured. Most of it still relies on self-reported data.

As usual, this is research hypothesis, this is the intended starting assumption of the study. On top of that, they clearly had a sampling bias in favour of small penises. So, they clearly went in with the intend of "it is all in your mind" and "penis size does not matter".

This study was publshed in medicine but clearly contains psychological framing elements. And I will also now prove this by just simply quoting:

1. Explicit “reassurance” framing (direct quote)​


From reporting on the study (based on author statements):




This is very clear framing:


  • The goal is not just measurement
  • It is explicitly about reassuring men



2. Stated purpose: easing anxiety​


Same source describing the study’s intent:




That directly shows:


  • The study is framed around anxiety reduction
  • Not purely neutral measurement



3. Direct references to “men anxious about size” (author’s research context)​


From related work by the same research group:




This is important because:


  • The same authors repeatedly define their population in psychological terms
  • This carries over into how the meta-analysis is framed



4. Author statement about reassurance limits (interview quote)​


From an interview with the lead author:




Again:


  • The concept of reassurance is central
  • The study is positioned as a tool for that




From reporting on earlier work by the same researcher:




This is the closest thing to:


  • “it’s in your mind” framing
  • though stated more carefully as lack of correlation


I want to clarify. Those are direct quotes from it. This clearly shows the psychological framing and it really shows their approach. This study is framed around "anxiety reduction" and their bias of "it is all in your mind". The quote "penis anxiety does not correlate to size" alone is enough to know how biased they are. This "study" is nothing more than "reassurance about the so called average size" which they created themselves. This is nothing but typical pep talk. This is a clear minimization. This is paternalism paired with a patronizing tone. For some reason this only comes when it is about penis size.
Same thing goes for women's size "preferences":
This is the so called "preferred size" or what they call "preferred size". There are also a threads and posts about on here as well. This is just based ob objects. They then coined it "preferred". This is misleading. I will elaborate on that:

For long-term partners:​


  • Length: ~6.3 inches (16.0 cm)
  • Girth: ~4.8 inches (12.2 cm)

For one-time partners:​


  • Length: ~6.4 inches (16.3 cm)
  • Girth: ~5.0 inches (12.7 cm)

This is the data. You really want to tell me that there is only 0.1 inch difference in one-time and long-term? The one-time is also the improtant part here.

I quote:
Important: The researchers did not publish a full table of how many women chose each specific length (e.g., how many women chose exactly the 7 in model). They only reported the average preferences for length and circumference in the key conditions.

Furthermore:

Limitations That Make It “Weak”​


  1. No frequency distribution
    • They didn’t report how many women picked each exact size.
    • You can’t tell if 1 woman picked 8 in and 10 picked 6 in — only the average is reported.
  2. Small sample size
    • N = 75 women is tiny, especially if you want population-level generalizations.
    • Any outliers (someone choosing very large or very small) could skew averages.
  3. Artificial lab conditions
    • 3D printed models in a lab aren’t the same as sexual experience.
    • Preference in a visual/manual test may not match real-world sexual attraction or satisfaction.
  4. Limited data granularity
    • We can’t say, “X% of women chose ≥7 in.”
    • Averages hide the spread; you lose insight into how many prefer truly larger sizes.
  5. Potential conservative bias
    • By reporting just averages and tiny differences between long-term and one-time preferences, the study downplays the appeal of larger-than-average sizes — which seems to align with a cultural tendency to minimize the importance of penis size.

Hypothetical Distribution​


Let’s imagine the choices if all 75 women were distributed across the 33 models, assuming a trend toward bigger is always better:


LengthHypothetical Number of Women ChoosingComment
4.0–5.0 in5Only a few women pick very small; these pull mean down.
5.5–6.0 in15Slightly below/around average, moderate choice.
6.3–6.5 in20This is the peak of the published average, moderately chosen.
7.0 in20Strong preference emerges for clearly larger size.
7.5–8.5 in15Some women prefer very large penises, but averaging hides them.

This illustrates that the published average masks the true trend toward larger penises.

Conclusion​


  • The hypothetical distribution isn’t just plausible — it’s likely more reflective of real female preference than the mean reported in the study.
  • The “6.3–6.4 in preferred” headline is a conservative, averaged figure that hides the true preference for larger sizes.
  • In other words, if you plotted the real, unobserved selections, the curve would likely be skewed toward bigger sizes, confirming the bigger-is-better trend.

Furthermore:

Key Message​


  • The oft-quoted “6.3–6.4 in preferred penis length” is not the upper limit of what women desire.
  • A bigger-is-better perspective shows:
    • Women consistently select above-average penises when given the option.
    • The study minimizes the appeal of truly large sizes, giving the impression that “slightly above average is ideal,” when in reality, many women would prefer 7–8 in or more.

Ultimately this "study" or this "data" despite it clearly shows that females do prefer bigger penises, it still tries to downplay it as in "it is not that bad".

1. Observer Effect / Social Desirability Bias


  • Women knew they were part of a study being conducted by researchers.
  • People tend to choose more “moderate” or socially acceptable options when observed, avoiding extreme selections that might seem “too much” or draw judgment.
  • In this context, even if a woman found 7.5–8 in more attractive, she might hesitate to choose it, opting instead for something closer to the perceived average (6.3–6.4 in).



2. Artificial Lab Environment


  • Handling 3D models is not the same as a real sexual experience.
  • Tactile, visual, and arousal cues are absent, which could make larger sizes seem intimidating or impractical, even if they would be more attractive in real-world sexual contexts.
  • Lab conditions generally suppress extreme preferences, favoring middle-of-the-range choices.



3. Sample Awareness


  • Participants knew their choices were being recorded and analyzed, which can consciously or subconsciously push toward “safe” choices.
  • This effect is particularly strong for intimate topics like penis size, where social norms and embarrassment may influence behavior.



Bigger-Is-Better Perspective​


From a bigger-is-better lens, this observation effect means:


  1. The true preference for larger sizes is likely underestimated.
  2. The reported averages (6.3–6.4 in) are conservative because women may have moderated their selections due to being observed.
  3. In a private or natural context, many women would likely choose 7 in, 7.5 in, or even larger models over the reported average.


What I am trying to get here is basically this. If the female have the option between the so called "preferred" size, a 6.4 inch penis or a 7.5 inch penis, she would obviously go for the 7.5 inch penis
I want to add:

Women had a range of options (4–8.5 in).

  • If you take the range of models (4–8.5 in) and calculate the simple midpoint:
4+8.52=6.25 in\frac{4 + 8.5}{2} = 6.25\text{ in}24+8.5=6.25 in
  • That is almost exactly the “preferred” size the study reported (6.3–6.4 in).

What this suggests:


  1. The “preferred” numbers are essentially just the midpoint of the available range.
  2. The study does not actually demonstrate a true preference, just what falls near the middle of the options presented.
  3. It’s very plausible that this wasn’t a discovery of women’s actual desire, but rather a consequence of how the experiment was structured: by providing a fixed range of 4–8.5 in, any averaging will naturally land near 6.25–6.4 in.

From a bigger-is-better perspective, this really exposes the study as underrepresenting the true upper-end preference — the way they report “preferred” makes it look modest by design, rather than revealing real female choice.

  1. The lower bound pulls the average down
    • The smallest model in the study was 4 in.
    • Even if many women preferred 7–8 in, the inclusion of 4 in (and a few women choosing it) drags the average downward.
  2. Midpoint effect of the range
    • With a range of 4–8.5 in, the midpoint is 6.25 in.
    • Reporting the mean without showing the spread naturally ends up close to that midpoint, regardless of true preference for the upper end.
  3. “Number game” effect
    • By designing the range and then only reporting the average, the study creates a result that looks modest (6.3–6.4 in) even if many women actually preferred bigger sizes.
    • It’s a classic averaging trick: the extremes get diluted and the headline number seems moderate.

Bottom line: The study’s reported “preferred size” is structurally constrained by the range they gave participants. It automatically produces a number lower than the true upper-range preference, which is why it’s misleading from a bigger-is-better perspective.
Furthermore and I quote directly from Wikipedia:

"Results suggested that most women preferred a penis only slightly larger than average size, that their preference differs slightly across different types of relationships, and that they found penis size to be relatively unimportant in a partner, less important than cooking skills or dress, and only more important than eye color and car type."

I quote specifically "and that they found penis size to be relatively unimportant in a partner". Furthermore "less important than cooking skills or dress, and only more important than eye color and car type."

You really want to tell me that "cooking" and "dress" is more important than penis size? It is now clearly evident that they went in with a bias. Now it clearly shows and reveals how bad this study is.

@St3v3Cel

1. “Preferred a penis only slightly larger than average”​


  • The study actually just reported the mean of the selections (6.3–6.4 in) without showing the distribution.
  • By phrasing it as “only slightly larger than average,” it downplays the fact that women could have picked larger sizes (up to 8.5 in) — a subtle minimization of bigger-is-better preference.
  • This framing makes it sound like women’s preference is modest, even though the study design allows for much larger options.



2. “Preference differs slightly across different types of relationships”​


  • In reality, the difference between long-term and one-time partner preference was tiny (0.1 in).
  • Emphasizing that there is a difference makes it look more nuanced and balanced, while the actual effect is negligible.



3. “Penis size relatively unimportant in a partner…”​


  • This statement reflects a psychological interpretation, not a direct measurement of sexual attraction.
  • It implicitly minimizes sexual relevance, framing penis size as secondary to cooking skills, dress, etc.
  • From a bigger-is-better lens, this is clearly a bias toward downplaying the importance of size — the actual tactile/visual preference data (up to 8.5 in models) is ignored in favor of social ranking.



4. Overall effect​


  • The Wikipedia phrasing reinforces a conservative, modest interpretation, giving the impression that women don’t care much about size.
  • In reality:
    • The study does not show how many women picked 7–8.5 in,
    • The “mean” is heavily influenced by small values and small sample,
    • Lab observation and artificial models likely suppressed extreme preferences.

Bottom line:


The Wikipedia summary reflects a bias toward minimizing penis size importance and female preference for larger sizes — it interprets averages as universal preference and downplays the upper end that the experimental design actually allowed.


This is a psychological interpretation and not a direct measurement of sexual attraction or actual sexual attraction. This is why this was published in psychology. Again, this is like the "Vale study" which was also published in psychology and it was also published in 2015 same as the study about "preferred" size. There are actually multiple studies that are published in 2015 about penis size and it is all in psychology.

Psychology/Behavioral Context


Even though it’s published in a urology journal (BJU International), the authors’ backgrounds are largely in psychology, psychiatry, and behavioral sciences — several are affiliated with the Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience in London.
There are other 2015 papers tied to these researchers in psychology or psychiatry that relate to penis size concerns, such as those exploring:


  • Body dysmorphic disorder regarding penis size, published in Sexual Medicine.
  • Phenomenology of men with penis size anxiety, published in Body Image.


They try to spin it and make it about "body dismorphic disorder". They specifically target men who are and I paraphrase "insecure about their size", so, they clearly went for men who have small penises. All those studies are published in psychology and they also have a psychological framing.

This clearly shows how bad this study is.
And now it becomes even more funny. I will quote directly from Wikipedia again:

Orgasmic meditation study​

Prause co-authored a study in 2021 on the effects of orgasmic meditation, which concluded that this genital stroking practice increased closeness in partners regardless of whether or not they had an existing romantic relationship.


This is Nicole Prause, the very same who also conducted the study about the so called "preferred" size in 2015.

Bigger-picture takeaway


  • The Wikipedia quote supports the observation that Prause’s research is strongly psychology-oriented, often prioritizing perception, intimacy, and subjective experiences.
  • From a rigor perspective, it’s fair to say this kind of work leans more toward exploratory or social science than hard, objective sexual science, which is why claims like “preferred penis size is 6.3–6.4 inches” should be treated with caution.


And yet people point out to that study. It is clear they did not even look at it, nor do they know about who published the study, who is behind of the study and in what field the study was published.
I just want to cover this comment briefly:

Striker_343
•vor 26 Min.


Saying PIV gets almost no woman off is crazy, I have a big dick and probably 7/10 women I've been with have came from penetration. My wife only cums from penetration. I've consistently received compliments on my cock, so I definitely think it's something that can be a nice thing to have.


He has a big penis and he immediately brags about it and also brags about how he is able to make females come from penetration only. He also brags more and says that he consistently received compliments about his big penis. This again destroys the notion of "females do not come from penetration", "they do not like big penises or "it hurts". Those are just platitudes and all of them are lies.
All the studies on average and preferred penis sizes are deeply flawed, and clearly had an agenda behind them. We do not know what the actual average is, all we can reliably know is that there is a massive disparity in penis sizes and that bigger is better.
 
Last edited:
I'm 5'4 and have the same size as lastgerman who is around 6'3? I have 6.3 inches ok girth too but my face and height made sure I'm still KHHV at 29
@LastGerman is far below 6.3 inches, but even if he had that it still wouldn't meet the bare minimum requirement that is 7 inches (a 0.7 inches difference is very significant. Every millimeter counts). I would go so far to say that it wouldn't matter even if he in actuality had something like 9 inches as long as he was still miraculously an incel. All that matters is consistently affirming and contributing to the good fight that is the dickpill, which he has ALWAYS done. How everyone turned on him for a bunch of old tongue-in-cheek posts everyone should have already known about is beyond me. Even if every man in the world woke up with 9 inches tomorrow it would be possible that the dickpill fight would not be over, because the ideal penis size could very well lay beyond that. We quite simply do not know because there has never been any proper studies on this. All we can reliably know is that bigger is better and that there is a massive disparity in penis sizes that must be corrected.
 
Last edited:
True the dickpill isn't the most major issue for incels but it still effects other Men.
It affects me every day. Every day I am in despair over it. Every day I make different decisions because of it. "Small dick energy" and "big dick energy" is no joke, it affects you profoundly. It is called one's manhood for a reason, the penis is effectively the entirety of a man's being. Coitus is the pinnacle of life but because I have a small penis I cannot have it. Even though I cannot have it I never stop desiring it. It is torturous.
 
Last edited:
@LastGerman is far below 6.3 inches, but even if he had that it still wouldn't meet the bare minimum requirement that is 7 inches (a 0.7 inches difference is very significant. Every millimeter counts). I would go so far to say that it wouldn't matter even if he in actuality had something like 9 inches as long as he was still miraculously an incel. All that matters is consistently affirming and contributing to the good fight that is the dickpill, which he has ALWAYS done. How everyone turned on him for a bunch of old tongue-in-cheek posts everyone should have already known about is beyond me. Even if every man in the world woke up with 9 inches tomorrow it would be possible that the dickpill fight would not be over, because the ideal penis size could very well lay beyond that. We quite simply do not know because there has never been any proper studies on this. All we can reliably know is that bigger is better and that there is a massive disparity in penis sizes that must be corrected.
The problem for the users was more that he's 6'3" tall and a MTN at least.
How big are you then?
There are women btw, who can only handle around 6.5 inches
But again, it doesn't matter in my case, even if I had 8 inches... I'm around 1.5/10 (yes, it's true) and 5'4", 29 year old KHHV.
 
The problem for the users was more that he's 6'3" tall and a MTN at least.
I recognise that being tall is a superior trait but it is only a bonus, without a big penis it is a waste. People are way overrrating him when they say that he has a MTN face, but out of respect for @LastGerman I'm not going into details about that. Learn to be more discerning.
There are women btw, who can only handle around 6.5 inches
Ryan Reynolds Reaction GIF

How about you tell me something that hasn't already been debunked before :bluepill:.

@LastGerman
But again, it doesn't matter in my case, even if I had 8 inches... I'm around 1.5/10 (yes, it's true) and 5'4", 29 year old KHHV.
You never know, that is still a significant SMV and life upgrade (you would meet and far exceed the minimum size requirement, which you currently do not even meet even though your size is not the worst mind you). I recognise that there can be incels with big penises but those are exceptions to the rule, more than a few men have been able to ascend purely from having a big penis even with otherwise truecel stats. You vastly underestimate how much women value penis size:
A thread made by @Jadis

A post by @Spooky_Heejin


@Spooky_Heejin also talked about it before. He is unable to even have coitus with his sex doll. Having a small penis compeltely limits you in every way possible.

Another post that also confirms it posted by @nazianime


A post by @Homegrownman326


A post made by me:


A reply to that post made by @dewadewadewa


My reply to that post:


A post by me where I also pointed out what I would do and how the use it in general:


A post by @St3v3Cel and how to use it:


A quote by me:


I pointed out to another user on this forum who told me that he was able to meet up with 3 different females solely because he has a big penis. As far as I know he also used a site specifically for it. There is also another user who I talked with in a direct conversation. Before we had a direct conversation, I told him to just sent pictures of his big penis to females and that it is that easy. He said in the direct conversation that he did exactly that and the female was all over his big penis. I said to him that it is that easy.

A quote by @St3v3Cel


I will go over 2 quotes from the same post made by me. First the part that goes over it that it is self-explaining:


The second part of my post is the most important part of it where I clearly lay out what to do, how to use a big penis and what I would do:


A post by @St3v3Cel


A post by @St3v3Cel that went over something that also almost no one else mentioned before:


It is basically that easy. Just go to Snapchat and men with big penises advertise their big penis.

My reply to it:


A post by @St3v3Cel where he added more crucial detail to it:


Men with big penises basically just have to do nothing. Females approach them.

A more recent thread by @AdExpress that shows how devastating the penis pill is:



1773870764307-png.1694521





A recent thread by me. This is about another 13 year old boy who has a 19 cm penis, 7.5 inch penis:



Another thread by @Jestermaxxest



This thread really shows how devastating it is.

I also still remember this quote posted by @RealSchizo


There would literally be more peace on earth if men had his "average" 8" perfect! She is right about it. I absolutely agree.

My reply to it:


A thread by @MajorThomas666

A quote by @BricABrac


This is just one quote. He made multiple posts like this. I just used it as one example. With that I elaborated on it.

@TooSomething @deleted dude @St3v3Cel @MoroccanFarmer

@Taini, @The Wolf is a great example of an user (and a moderator, no less) who repeatedly jumps into dickpill threads to deny the dickpill. This comment of his I replied to here wasn't even worth replying to for me, because he has made the same types of comments and gotten the same types of responses about the dickpill time and time again. In no right world would there need to be a discussion about this, but notice how large a "discussion" your thread generated right away for something which supposedly "doesn't matter" (and this is ALWAYS the case). That is the only thing they ever have to say about it. They spout the phrase of "it doesn't matter" over and over again.
 
Last edited:
I recognise that being tall is a superior trait but it is only a bonus, without a big penis it is a waste. People are way overrrating him when they say that he has a MTN face, but out of respect for @LastGerman I'm not going into details about that. Learn to be more discerning.

Ryan Reynolds Reaction GIF

How about you tell me something that hasn't already been debunked before :bluepill:.

@LastGerman

You never know, that is still a significant SMV and life upgrade (you would meet and far exceed the minimum size requirement, which you currently do not even meet even though your size is not the worst mind you). I recognise that there can be incels with big penises but those are exceptions to the rule, more than a few men have been able to ascend purely from having a big penis even with otherwise truecel stats. You vastly underestimate how much women value penis size:


@Taini, @The Wolf is a great example of an user (and a moderator, no less) who repeatedly jumps into dickpill threads to deny the dickpill. This comment of his I replied to here wasn't even worth replying to for me, because he has made the same types of comments and gotten the same types of responses about the dickpill time and time again. In no right world would there need to be a discussion about this, but notice how large a "discussion" your thread generated right away for something which supposedly "doesn't matter" (and this is ALWAYS the case). That is the only thing they ever have to say about it. They spout the phrase of "it doesn't matter" over and over again.
Tell me exactly where I say dick size doesn't matter. I have never said it doesn't matter. Not once.
Saying it doesn't matter in my case does not count. If I had 8 inches, how would girls even know if they are not attracted, but repulsed by me in the first case?
And you haven't said how big your dick is either.
 
Dickpill and gympill are gay af
 
If dick size was so important, china and india wouldn't be the 2 highest population
 
Tell me exactly where I say dick size doesn't matter. I have never said it doesn't matter. Not once.
Saying it doesn't matter in my case does not count. If I had 8 inches, how would girls even know if they are not attracted, but repulsed by me in the first case?
And you haven't said how big your dick is either.
@St3v3Cel … awaiting your reply and evidence where I said dicksize doesn’t matter. The only thing I ever said: in my case it doesn’t matter.
If you are 5’5 with a bad face and 8 inches dick; how would girls even know your size? You’d just whip it out and show them? No you wouldn’t.
Can you tell me how they’d know?
 
Saying it doesn't matter in my case does not count. If I had 8 inches, how would girls even know if they are not attracted, but repulsed by me in the first case?
How about you read the comment I made before you reply to it? It explicitly goes over this:
A thread made by @Jadis

A post by @Spooky_Heejin


@Spooky_Heejin also talked about it before. He is unable to even have coitus with his sex doll. Having a small penis compeltely limits you in every way possible.

Another post that also confirms it posted by @nazianime


A post by @Homegrownman326


A post made by me:


A reply to that post made by @dewadewadewa


My reply to that post:


A post by me where I also pointed out what I would do and how the use it in general:


A post by @St3v3Cel and how to use it:


A quote by me:


I pointed out to another user on this forum who told me that he was able to meet up with 3 different females solely because he has a big penis. As far as I know he also used a site specifically for it. There is also another user who I talked with in a direct conversation. Before we had a direct conversation, I told him to just sent pictures of his big penis to females and that it is that easy. He said in the direct conversation that he did exactly that and the female was all over his big penis. I said to him that it is that easy.

A quote by @St3v3Cel


I will go over 2 quotes from the same post made by me. First the part that goes over it that it is self-explaining:


The second part of my post is the most important part of it where I clearly lay out what to do, how to use a big penis and what I would do:


A post by @St3v3Cel


A post by @St3v3Cel that went over something that also almost no one else mentioned before:


It is basically that easy. Just go to Snapchat and men with big penises advertise their big penis.

My reply to it:


A post by @St3v3Cel where he added more crucial detail to it:


Men with big penises basically just have to do nothing. Females approach them.

A more recent thread by @AdExpress that shows how devastating the penis pill is:



1773870764307-png.1694521





A recent thread by me. This is about another 13 year old boy who has a 19 cm penis, 7.5 inch penis:



Another thread by @Jestermaxxest



This thread really shows how devastating it is.

I also still remember this quote posted by @RealSchizo


There would literally be more peace on earth if men had his "average" 8" perfect! She is right about it. I absolutely agree.

My reply to it:


A thread by @MajorThomas666

A quote by @BricABrac


This is just one quote. He made multiple posts like this. I just used it as one example. With that I elaborated on it.

@TooSomething @deleted dude @St3v3Cel @MoroccanFarmer
Anti-dickpillers always talk about some grand reveal of one's penis size. There should never, ever be that kind of a is-it-a-girl-or-is-it-a-boy-like "reveal". If you have a big penis with otherwise truecel stats you should be talking about it to anyone and everyone at all times both in real life and online. You should use it to get you into the bedroom.
And you haven't said how big your dick is either.
I have already stated that I don't think the size a dickpiller has is relevant, but I am a dickcel personally because it is firmly below the supposed international average penis size. I can't predict how I would act if I had a big penis and somehow still found myself on this site, but I hope that I would still affirm and acknowledge the dickpill in such an alternative universe. I would probably be enjoying my life to the fullest with escorts if I was miraculously still an incel despite having a big penis in such a scenario though, .is would have never crossed my mind. That is assuming that coitus with a big penis is the pinnacle of life like I think it ought to be, but of course I will never be able to know. My life would be significantly better in every conceivable way at the very least, I am sure of that much.
Tell me exactly where I say dick size doesn't matter. I have never said it doesn't matter. Not once.
Nicolas Cage Laughing GIF

"Not once":
dick does not matter if you are short and ugly, or either of these badly.
You literally said it just earlier in this thread. It certainly matters, even for men who are incels like I have already explained in this thread. If you want to clarify what your stance on the dickpill is, go ahead. Please do me the courtesy of actually fully reading the comments I have already made in this thread before you do so though, as well as any further replies I make if you wish to have an honest discussion about this. Let's keep it civil and respectful.

@LastGerman
 
dickpill-saint-lastgerman-jpg.1657239

Ascending with a small penis is a physical impossibility, because sex with a small penis is not sex. Coitus is only possible with a big penis. There is no pleasure for either the woman or the man with the small penis. This means that proper masturbation is not possible with a small penis either, because there is no physical pleasure. The only sexual pleasure a man with a small penis can get is from his imagination, and some can not even muster that. What we were set here to do in life is to have coitus, it is the pinnacle of life. Because of that the penis is effectively the entirety of a man's being, because nothing defines him more. The penis is called one's "manhood" for a reason, every other stat is just a bonus. Even with otherwise truecel stats a big penis is enough to ascend you. There are of course exceptions but those merely reinforce the rule and their lives still mog dickcel's lives, @MoroccanFarmer once summarised it well:

Being a dickcel is a torturous existence to say the least. The penis pill always collects.

The reality is that everyone knows the dickpill to be true, but they get a sadistic kick out of denying the dickpill and trolling dickcels (as well as a sweet ego boost, if they themselves have big penises). Every other major pill except the dickpill is protected on this site. You are not allowed to deny the heightpill or brag about being tall on this site, for example, plenty of people have gotten banned for that but such is not the case for the dickpill. They do not even have a single argument against it, all they say time and time again is that it "does not matter", even though "size doesn't matter" is the biggest bluepill lie ever told. Size matters, there is no concept as easily and widely understood as "bigger is better". There is no such thing as a penis that is too big either, because women were made to birth children.

There is an old saying that goes "never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity" but when it comes to anti-dickpillers you have to flip that saying on its head to maintain your sanity, i.e. "never attribute to stupidity that which is adequately explained by malice". The reason these people say these things does not come from any kind of intellectual curiosity or intent for an honest debate, because if it did they would have something more to say than simply "it doesn't matter" and a bunch of insults towards dickcels and dickpillers. Make no mistake, these users are coming from a place of malice. There are plenty of otherwise respectable users who take joy in the suffering of dickcels.

Exactly. There is a massive disparity (not healthy variety, unlike what bluepill gaslighters want you to believe) in penis sizes that needs to be corrected. Unfortunately current widespread penis enlargement techniques will turn your penis into an unuseable abomination, stay far away from them. It's important that you have a penis that works properly, even if it is still small, because if you lose that you will lose all of your humanity. The only potential solution for dickcels would be something like a patent involving Relaxin @LastGerman discovered:


The only other solution would be selective breeding where only men with big penises and women whose father and etc had a big penis would get to breed, in order to aid genetic recombination with children who meet the bare minimum requirement that is 7 inches:
It is unfortunately very unlikely that we ever see the small penis problem solved, because normies (and even fellow incels) take such pleasure in torturing dickcels. The supposed "average" is a great example of this:

Same thing goes for women's size "preferences":





All the studies on average and preferred penis sizes are deeply flawed, and clearly had an agenda behind them. We do not know what the actual average is, all we can reliably know is that there is a massive disparity in penis sizes and that bigger is better.
YES! PERFECT! PEOPLE LIKE YOU ARE WHY I WAKE UP EVERYDAY. 100% on the fucking A-Spot Orgasm post reference. PERFECT! So many fuckers utter over and over again “ehhhhh mooost girls cant have a penis in vagina orgasmmmm ehhhhh” but they also fail to mention the fact that most men don’t have a penis that can CAUSE a pure Penis in Vagina orgasm. The bullshit that all of these uneducated fuckers throw out is so easily disprovable that it’s insulting that they even try to say it doesn’t matter at all.
dickpill-saint-lastgerman-jpg.1657239

Ascending with a small penis is a physical impossibility, because sex with a small penis is not sex. Coitus is only possible with a big penis. There is no pleasure for either the woman or the man with the small penis. This means that proper masturbation is not possible with a small penis either, because there is no physical pleasure. The only sexual pleasure a man with a small penis can get is from his imagination, and some can not even muster that. What we were set here to do in life is to have coitus, it is the pinnacle of life. Because of that the penis is effectively the entirety of a man's being, because nothing defines him more. The penis is called one's "manhood" for a reason, every other stat is just a bonus. Even with otherwise truecel stats a big penis is enough to ascend you. There are of course exceptions but those merely reinforce the rule and their lives still mog dickcel's lives, @MoroccanFarmer once summarised it well:

Being a dickcel is a torturous existence to say the least. The penis pill always collects.

The reality is that everyone knows the dickpill to be true, but they get a sadistic kick out of denying the dickpill and trolling dickcels (as well as a sweet ego boost, if they themselves have big penises). Every other major pill except the dickpill is protected on this site. You are not allowed to deny the heightpill or brag about being tall on this site, for example, plenty of people have gotten banned for that but such is not the case for the dickpill. They do not even have a single argument against it, all they say time and time again is that it "does not matter", even though "size doesn't matter" is the biggest bluepill lie ever told. Size matters, there is no concept as easily and widely understood as "bigger is better". There is no such thing as a penis that is too big either, because women were made to birth children.

There is an old saying that goes "never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity" but when it comes to anti-dickpillers you have to flip that saying on its head to maintain your sanity, i.e. "never attribute to stupidity that which is adequately explained by malice". The reason these people say these things does not come from any kind of intellectual curiosity or intent for an honest debate, because if it did they would have something more to say than simply "it doesn't matter" and a bunch of insults towards dickcels and dickpillers. Make no mistake, these users are coming from a place of malice. There are plenty of otherwise respectable users who take joy in the suffering of dickcels.

Exactly. There is a massive disparity (not healthy variety, unlike what bluepill gaslighters want you to believe) in penis sizes that needs to be corrected. Unfortunately current widespread penis enlargement techniques will turn your penis into an unuseable abomination, stay far away from them. It's important that you have a penis that works properly, even if it is still small, because if you lose that you will lose all of your humanity. The only potential solution for dickcels would be something like a patent involving Relaxin @LastGerman discovered:


The only other solution would be selective breeding where only men with big penises and women whose father and etc had a big penis would get to breed, in order to aid genetic recombination with children who meet the bare minimum requirement that is 7 inches:
It is unfortunately very unlikely that we ever see the small penis problem solved, because normies (and even fellow incels) take such pleasure in torturing dickcels. The supposed "average" is a great example of this:

Same thing goes for women's size "preferences":





All the studies on average and preferred penis sizes are deeply flawed, and clearly had an agenda behind them. We do not know what the actual average is, all we can reliably know is that there is a massive disparity in penis sizes and that bigger is better.

Absolutely phenomenal, outstanding, thoughtful, and perfectly worded post. People like you are one of the reasons I keep going.

The study you dropped with the A Spot orgasm is the final silver bullet to the “it doesn’t matter” argument. And I’ll infuse the bullet with this final spin:

Ever heard of the saying “Most women dont cum from penis in vagina only sex anyways?”

Well yeah the same people NEVER also say within the same paragraph that the modern day average man’s penis size DOESNT fully 100% stimulate the vaginal canal’s nervous network in its entirety.

These same women would have a VERY different experience if something inside of them was fully massaging the nerve network down there in its fullness and not merely tickling it.

This is also another reason why the modern day woman has become hardened and not in her “soft girl era” anymore. Women have become addicted to clitoris stimulation (basically jacking off their female penis) because it is rare for them to have a extreme nervous system overload/stimulating experience that causes full body, melting, convulsing spiritual releases that feminizes and softens the heart. This shit is literally ESOTERIC in nature and 90% of the fuckers on this planet, especially in the western world don’t understand this shit because they are too caught up in their dumbass ego to call out an issue and talk about it.
 
dickpill-saint-lastgerman-jpg.1657239

Penis Enlargement​

Abstract​

A method for causing a permanent increase in the length and girth of a male subject's penis, the method comprising treatment comprising the step of (a) administering to the male an effective amount of a vasodilator selected from the group consisting of a vasodilator per se and compositions thereof comprising a pharmaceutically-acceptable diluent or carrier, to induce a cumulative prolonged engorgement of the subject's penis; and (b) repeating step (a) as necessary to cause the increase during the treatment. A potentiator which enhances the effect of the vasodilator may also be used.

Classifications​

A61K38/2221 Relaxins
View 5 more classifications

US20100112027A1​


Status

Abandoned


Unfortunately it has been abandoned. Yet we do have a solution right here. They could have utilised it. They could have made money off of it, but they did not do it. This is why I think it is not about money. This again just confirms what I have been thinking the whole time. I think it is by design. It is on purpose.

Relaxin is an important key here. Relaxin is a master hormone:
  • [0055]
    Relaxin directly and indirectly triggers a cascade of complex biochemical and cellular effects that can cause general morphological changes to genitalia. Prostaglandins such as prostaglandin F2 alpha and prostaglandin E2 have similar effects. This invention includes the mediators of these cascades as potentiators.
  • [0056]
    Collagen is a component of the extracellular matrix (ECM), which is a dynamic entity with many other components (e.g., proteoglycans, fibronectin, elastin, laminin, etc.) that functions as a storage reservoir for cytokines and enzymes and interacts intimately with surrounding cells to provide a structural scaffold and an efficient biochemical communication network within tissues. Enzymes primarily responsible for ECM remodeling are the Matrix MetalloProteinases (MMPs), which break down ECM components, and the Tissue Inhibitors of Matrix MetalloProteinases (TIMPs). Maintenance of a balance of ECM synthesis and MMP/TIMP activity in tissues is required for normal homeostasis; imbalances will generally lead to diseases or developmental problems such as scleroderma, periodontal disease, restenosis, osteoarthritis, liver cirrhosis, glomerulonephritis, and ulceration.
  • [0057]
    Relaxin is a 6 kDa peptide hormone that is structurally similar to insulin; the prohormone form consists of B-C-A chains (20 kDa), and the C chain is proteolytically excised in ‘mature’ relaxin. However, unlike many other pro-hormones, pro-relaxin retains its biological activity. The profile of conserved amino acid sequences among various species such as pig, human, whale, porpoise, and shark suggests that relaxin is an ancient hormone with a unique molecular evolutionary history. The most recognized effect of relaxin on target cells is induction of MMP expression and inhibition of collagen synthesis.
  • [0058]
    Historically, relaxin has been classified as a “pregnancy hormone” that acts on reproductive tissues only during pregnancy, preparing the female for parturition by “relaxing” the pelvic ligaments and tendons. However, recent evidence suggests that relaxin may be classified as a “master hormone” that also induces biochemical changes in a number of non-reproductive tissues. In addition to up-regulating MMP expression in reproductive tissues such as the cervix and placenta relaxin up-regulates expression of MMP-1 and MMP-3 in lung fibroblasts, skin fibroblasts, and fibrocartilaginous cells. Relaxin receptors are found in the brain heart, skin, nipples, small intestine, mammary gland, blood vessels, and testes. The bioactivity of relaxin is unique when compared with other cytokines that affect ECM

Actually, this may not be so mystical to me. I’ve heard of something like this. It’s a chemical compound that gives you a prolonged priapism and that essentially grows it. Please do make that post that you said you’re going to make. This is extremely interesting. I’ll follow you on here we should compare notes.​

 
Yes i’d rather be tall with a tiny dick than be short with a big one
Imagine having a big dick that touches the ground but you're only 4 feet tall. After all the women all wanna date this kind of guy.
lord farquaad shrek GIF


The dickpill is retarded because you'll be rejected for your height or face way before your dick.
 
dude trust me i know.

some reject niggers with huge bbc
I thought they just get rejected because they either try to haggle, aren't attractive to them, or get violent. I've seen so many escort ads saying no black men. Makes me glad to be white.
 
YES! PERFECT! PEOPLE LIKE YOU ARE WHY I WAKE UP EVERYDAY. 100% on the fucking A-Spot Orgasm post reference. PERFECT! So many fuckers utter over and over again “ehhhhh mooost girls cant have a penis in vagina orgasmmmm ehhhhh” but they also fail to mention the fact that most men don’t have a penis that can CAUSE a pure Penis in Vagina orgasm. The bullshit that all of these uneducated fuckers throw out is so easily disprovable that it’s insulting that they even try to say it doesn’t matter at all.


Absolutely phenomenal, outstanding, thoughtful, and perfectly worded post. People like you are one of the reasons I keep going.

The study you dropped with the A Spot orgasm is the final silver bullet to the “it doesn’t matter” argument. And I’ll infuse the bullet with this final spin:

Ever heard of the saying “Most women dont cum from penis in vagina only sex anyways?”

Well yeah the same people NEVER also say within the same paragraph that the modern day average man’s penis size DOESNT fully 100% stimulate the vaginal canal’s nervous network in its entirety.

These same women would have a VERY different experience if something inside of them was fully massaging the nerve network down there in its fullness and not merely tickling it.

This is also another reason why the modern day woman has become hardened and not in her “soft girl era” anymore. Women have become addicted to clitoris stimulation (basically jacking off their female penis) because it is rare for them to have a extreme nervous system overload/stimulating experience that causes full body, melting, convulsing spiritual releases that feminizes and softens the heart. This shit is literally ESOTERIC in nature and 90% of the fuckers on this planet, especially in the western world don’t understand this shit because they are too caught up in their dumbass ego to call out an issue and talk about it.
Thank you very much. Indeed, it just does not make sense that women would not be able to orgasm from PIV sex. If women couldn't orgasm from PIV sex humanity would have died out, or at least been far smaller than it is now. The mystery is why small penises exist, because the disparity we find in human men is nowhere to be found in other species. It is not a case of healthy variety in any sense, unlike what gaslighting documents like the ancient Kama Sutra would want you to believe. The reality is that women do orgasm from PIV sex all the time, if the penis is big. The supposed "average" penis size is definitely significantly smaller than what the real average is as well, like the LastGerman quotes I mentioned point out. Still, the small penis problem is more than widespread enough. Even the real average penis size is most likely far below what is should be. Women do not have this "variety" at all. There are exceptionally few women with things like vaginismus and similar, and the ones that do have surgeries so that they can take big penises:

View: https://www.reddit.com/r/smalldickproblems/comments/vy3kgb/hello_from_your_friendly_neighborhood_vaginismus/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web3x&utm_name=web3xcss&utm_term=1&utm_content=share_button


View: https://www.reddit.com/r/smalldickproblems/comments/vy3kgb/comment/ig19f5b/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web3x&utm_name=web3xcss&utm_term=1&utm_content=share_button


View: https://www.reddit.com/r/smalldickproblems/comments/vy3kgb/comment/ig1snoq/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web3x&utm_name=web3xcss&utm_term=1&utm_content=share_button

Even if they would be stuck without proper surgieries and procedures like men with small penises are they would still dread it. The wheelchair analogy the one Redditor makes there is spot on:
The whole "find a woman with vaginismus" argument is so dumb. Its not that they will like or prefer our small dick (assuming she dont use dilators) they just cant take it bigger. Its like asking a handicapped guy if he prefers a auto wheelchair or a manual one, in reality he prefers to walk, but he cant...
I will say that in principle it shouldn't matter if the woman is getting pleasure or not, because the cuckoo's nest that is the female mind will never be satisfied. @FoidsEnshittifyAll made a great thread about it:
The problem is that practically it is a major turn-off to not be able to satisfy a foid, even if you can get physical pleasure from your penis. Even if all men had penises that could satisfy themselves foids would still be an issue.

Actually, this may not be so mystical to me. I’ve heard of something like this. It’s a chemical compound that gives you a prolonged priapism and that essentially grows it.​

The only other solution I could see besides that would be something like Brain Computer Interfaces simulating what having a big penis and so on is like for us dickcels. That would probably arrive earlier than this type of proper solution unfortunately.

Please do make that post that you said you’re going to make. This is extremely interesting. I’ll follow you on here we should compare notes.​

I will have to see if I ever release that thread, it would be very long. It is painful to look into the dickpill in depth, and as you can see it isn't exactly popular here either. The only other explanation I have for people denying the dickpill that's not malice, is because of some users here perhaps being a little squeamish about graphic details like penis size. I think as blackpillers we need to dare to approach things like the dickpill even if there is a sentiment of faggotry and taboo around it, because it is an important medical reality that we need to face. As adults and incels it is something we should be able to talk about, but many people here seem to want to shut down discussion of it entirely.
 
Dick obsessed faggot -> DNR
 
The dickpill is brutal. Every time I look down when I'm peeing or taking a shower, watch porn, or when I'm looking at females, or think about anything even remotely sexual, all I can think about is my pencil dick.
It's always there and it'll always negatively affect my behavior and mental health. You can't truly be confident as a man if you have a small dick. It affects literally everything and it's always in the back of my mind, both consciously and subconsciously.

I can't even enjoy masturbation, at least psychologically. I can't wear certain types of pants and I'm always conscious of my lack of bulge when sitting across from someone. I avoid public urinals and showers because for some reason men are expected to be naked around other men.

Just knowing that your dick isn't capable of satisfying a female has to make you feel worthless as a man, at least on some level.
Penis size is by far the most common insult among normies, and having a massive dick as a man has to be the biggest flex. It's probably a special kind of feeling, and nothing else compares.
 
Last edited:
You just making shit more complicated than it already is
 
Dnr. All biological males are real men
 
fuck off, GrAY. if a foid sees your dick to begin with, you are fakecel.
 
The dickpill is brutal. Every time I look down when I'm peeing or taking a shower, watch porn, or when I'm looking at females, or think about anything even remotely sexual, all I can think about is my pencil dick.
It's always there and it'll always negatively affect my behavior and mental health. You can't truly be confident as a man if you have a small dick. It affects literally everything and it's always in the back of my mind, both consciously and subconsciously.

I can't even enjoy masturbation, at least psychologically. I can't wear certain types of pants and I'm always conscious of my lack of bulge when sitting across from someone. I avoid public urinals and showers because for some reason men are expected to be naked around other men.

Just knowing that your dick isn't capable of satisfying a female has to make you feel worthless as a man, at least on some level.
Penis size is by far the most common insult among normies, and having a massive dick as a man has to be the biggest flex. It's probably a special kind of feeling, and nothing else compares.
i know that GIF
 
@LastGerman is far below 6.3 inches, but even if he had that it still wouldn't meet the bare minimum requirement that is 7 inches (a 0.7 inches difference is very significant. Every millimeter counts). I would go so far to say that it wouldn't matter even if he in actuality had something like 9 inches as long as he was still miraculously an incel. All that matters is consistently affirming and contributing to the good fight that is the dickpill, which he has ALWAYS done. How everyone turned on him for a bunch of old tongue-in-cheek posts everyone should have already known about is beyond me. Even if every man in the world woke up with 9 inches tomorrow it would be possible that the dickpill fight would not be over, because the ideal penis size could very well lay beyond that. We quite simply do not know because there has never been any proper studies on this. All we can reliably know is that bigger is better and that there is a massive disparity in penis sizes that must be corrected.
I recognise that being tall is a superior trait but it is only a bonus, without a big penis it is a waste. People are way overrrating him when they say that he has a MTN face, but out of respect for @
LastGerman
@LastGerman I'm not going into details about that. Learn to be more discerning.
@TooSomething thoughts? You seemed hurt over the "exposé" of LastGerman. The things in that Moth thread weren't news to me, and the above is my perspective on it. You spent a longer time than anyone currently here with LastGerman, interacting with him nearly daily. Do you really feel so betrayed that you would never want to talk with him again?
 
Dick obsessed faggot -> DNR
By this logic doesn’t being blackpill make you a faggot by default? If you’re blackpill, you are by default obsessed with other men’s winnings and dont try to deny it with your bitch ass. YOU have a dick too dumb fuck so how is it gay to be concerned that your own manhood is good enough to FUCK GIRLS? Think about the shit you say before you post it.
 
fuck off, GrAY. if a foid sees your dick to begin with, you are fakecel.
No you aren’t motherfucker. You have to actually complete the act of copulation to not be an incel dickhead.
 
No you aren’t motherfucker. You have to actually complete the act of copulation to not be an incel dickhead.

cope GrAY - if you've made out and undressed a woman, you are a FAKECEL
 
@TooSomething thoughts? You seemed hurt over the "exposé" of LastGerman. The things in that Moth thread weren't news to me, and the above is my perspective on it. You spent a longer time than anyone currently here with LastGerman, interacting with him nearly daily. Do you really feel so betrayed that you would never want to talk with him again?
I have no idea who this guy is.
 

Similar threads

Moth
Replies
55
Views
3K
LeFrenchCel
LeFrenchCel
Scandi_Incel
Replies
6
Views
873
Scandi_Incel
Scandi_Incel
LowIQ loner
Replies
24
Views
2K
Saiyangenetics
Saiyangenetics
Scandi_Incel
Replies
8
Views
623
Scandi_Incel
Scandi_Incel

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top
×
Sponsored
Stake.us
America's #1 Social Casino
Slots, Poker & More
Join Now →