Serious If you’re not blackpilled idgaf what you have to say about “men’s issues”

[Hoodpreet]

“Shoe0nhead is so based! She talks about mEn’S IsSuEs, BrO!”

“Vaush isn’t that bad, he raises awareness for MeN’S iSSuEs bRoO!!”

This should go without saying, but if you aren’t blackpilled I don’t give a rat’s fucking ass what you have to say about men’s issues. For your prescription to be worth a flying fuck, you at least need to be able to diagnose the source of a problem correctly, and you CANNOT do that with men’s issues without a blackpill framework.

Even if he doesn’t give a fuck about anyone but himself, ********** is still far more beneficial for men as a collective than the vast majority of MRAs are, because he at least exposes the underlying problem that enables the societal rot – (anti-male) lookism and looks-based female hypergamy. I’ve seen even leftist soyfags on “breadtube” admit that there’s a good amount of truth to the BP after **********’s rise, noting that he wouldn’t be able to do so much as half the shit he does if he wasn’t good-looking.

Naming the BP within an MRA context should be a mandatory litmus test the same way naming the Jew used to be within a Dissident Right context – if someone refuses to do so, they can and should be written off as a grifter

 

[FuckYou]

“Shoe0nhead is so based! She talks about mEn’S IsSuEs, BrO!”

“Vaush isn’t that bad, he raises awareness for MeN’S iSSuEs bRoO!!”

I saw a thread here yesterday hyping up Obama for allegedly "caring" about men's issues lol.

 

[Hoodpreet]

Dead on arrival

 

[SupremeSaint]

“Shoe0nhead is so based! She talks about mEn’S IsSuEs, BrO!”

“Vaush isn’t that bad, he raises awareness for MeN’S iSSuEs bRoO!!”

Both are insane grifters(more so the former rather than the latter)

 

[The Death Devil]

Even if he doesn’t give a fuck about anyone but himself, ********** is still far more beneficial for men as a collective

LMAO, took me a while to realize what you were mentioning.

 

[AtrociousCitizen]

If anyone is planning to have a meaningful discussion about the detriments within society — which rests on the foundations of heavily gynocentric sentiments and liberalism, which interacts poorly with female nature — they must be capable of addressing the elephant in the room. Anyone who is unwilling to call out female nature for its true depravity is undeserving of any respect. This reminds me of a man whom I recently saw advocating for men in certain male issues, but the problem is he never addresses female nature and the core causes of many of the problems within our society, which clearly signals he is either delusional or lacks a spine.

The main problem with these morons is they talk about "men's issues" in a way that is safe and doesn't challenge the fundamental hierarchy. They typically blame abstract concepts you can't touch. The Blackpill is dangerous to them because it’s tangible, and you can measure it with a ruler and a mirror. That's why they'll never truly adopt the framework.

 

[Pikacel]

We don’t need fake sympathy

You’re supposed to vent here with people who relate

 

[The Death Devil]

You're entirely correct, although I've never bothered to actually think about it... I just KNEW on an instinctual level that anyone who was talking about 'problems that men face' who wasn't doing so from a black-pilled perspective had zero clue what they were talking about. I mean, what are you even going to say that could be even REMOTELY interesting? 99.5% of 'men's problems' all stem from some aspect of the black-pill—and, if you even wanted to go far enough to say it—women in general.

Women are the source of men's issues. Men get screwed over in court because women are manipulative pieces of trash who have gone out of their way to make sure that society looks at men as violent beasts who are incapable of taking care of children, for instance. Many men are largely depressed because nobody wants anything to do with them since they're ugly, short, deathnic, or some other incel trait—and WOMEN are the reason for that since they've made out all men who inhibit such traits to be 'creeps' and other things of the like.

WTF are MRAs actually talking about? What could they POSSIBLY be saying that isn't in some way accusing women? There is nothing you can do for men unless you're using a black-pilled perspective. Everything else are just band-aid solutions that never address the core issue, and, consequently, will never help men in any capacity.

 

[The Death Devil]

If anyone is planning to have a meaningful discussion about the detriments within society — which rests on the foundations of heavily gynocentric sentiments and liberalism, which interacts poorly with female nature — they must be capable of addressing the elephant in the room. Anyone who is unwilling to call out female nature for its true depravity is undeserving of any respect. This reminds me of a man whom I recently saw advocating for men in certain male issues, but the problem is he never addresses female nature and the core causes of many of the problems within our society, which clearly signals he is either delusional or lacks a spine.

The main problem with these morons is they talk about "men's issues" in a way that is safe and doesn't challenge the fundamental hierarchy. They typically blame abstract concepts you can't touch. The Blackpill is dangerous to them because it’s tangible, and you can measure it with a ruler and a mirror. That's why they'll never truly adopt the framework.

You said it better than I could desu

 

[Autistic Uggo]

Unless they affirm the blackpill, I just assume they're patronising us.

 

[Based_Catcel]

“Shoe0nhead is so based! She talks about mEn’S IsSuEs, BrO!”

How would a foid understand mens issues? "Trad" and "anti feminist" foids are so annoying

 

[DoomThreeKoala]

**********

I assume you're talking anout the Florida .org shit we're not allowed to talk about outside the sewers

 

[Grodd]

If anyone is planning to have a meaningful discussion about the detriments within society — which rests on the foundations of heavily gynocentric sentiments and liberalism, which interacts poorly with female nature — they must be capable of addressing the elephant in the room. Anyone who is unwilling to call out female nature for its true depravity is undeserving of any respect. This reminds me of a man whom I recently saw advocating for men in certain male issues, but the problem is he never addresses female nature and the core causes of many of the problems within our society, which clearly signals he is either delusional or lacks a spine.

The main problem with these morons is they talk about "men's issues" in a way that is safe and doesn't challenge the fundamental hierarchy. They typically blame abstract concepts you can't touch. The Blackpill is dangerous to them because it’s tangible, and you can measure it with a ruler and a mirror. That's why they'll never truly adopt the framework.

 

[Grodd]

Yep especially when considering alot of Men who speak on Mens issues hate on us also.