Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Serious If you're at all concerned about women being raped, you're a cuck

The correct equivalent would be a woman shoving her pussy onto my dick repeatedly. Which I'd be fine with, as long as it fits the criteria I've specified above (no STDs, not filthy as hell).

Lol at it's ok if it fits my criteria because of course that's how it happen.
 
Rape is wrong imo if:
1. She is a virgin.
If she cheerishes her innocence, as women should, then rape is wrong as you are stealing her highly valueable virginity.
2. If she is married(or in a serious relationship)
Her sexlife belongs to another man and raping her would mean that you are seriously damaging him.

In any other case rape is justified. I.e if the girl is single and sleeps around much, taking dick is something she does on the regular so taking another is nothing. Now it's a different story if you beat her or something like that.

Your points make sense.

But what if she is lesbian, but not virgin?

Jus not having sex with men anymore.

That would be a bit like gay rape again?
 
Low iq thread. Too many ways to say you're wrong, but a lot of the previous comments have already said it.
 
Women hate the fact that a weak, ugly, poor, a true walking genetic residual man managed to get the literal only think she has to exchange socially (because they are dumb and inferior to us in every possible way), and that is her pussy.

In normal conditions I'd defend a 5 years charge for a rapist because of ethical justice, but nowadays cucks who believe in childish female lies think it is an horrendous crime and there is not a single parliament member in western nations truly concerned with ethics instead of "ooowww she got violented, how dare you even look at a female if she tells you to not do so, death penalty!".
 
Nice cucktears bait.
 
I don't concern myself with anything that's not in or around my house.
Imagine if you were raped by a hambeast. Gross, right? But probably not something that'd give you PTSD (lol) or that'd really be that big a deal at the end of the day.
Barring unicorn cases, foids don't rape men. Imagine getting raped by a bigger and stronger man, would you want that? But of course, society doesn't care about men.
 
Damn I can't believe I've never thought about that. It really does make you wonder, if a roasties husband that she "loves" has trouble making her fun and has to spend hours flicking and licking her PUSSY, while some random rapist can make her fun from just penetration.

It's clearly in the woman's nature to be attracted to aggression... The forceful man is more attractive than the loving one.

It makes sense, as an aggressive man will be able to provide for the children through whatever means necessary, but a loving man may be more concerned with morals and such things.

In terms of giving her offspring the best chance of survival... the aggressive man makes sense.
 
Extreme IQ thread
 
the reason why they think rape is the worst thing that can happen to them is because 'how DARE an ugly, unworthy creep have sex with me???' remember, sex doesnt even cause physical pain, it's all in the mind. trauma from rape is socially construted, as the sexual organs are portrayed as private and gross from a young age. if our genitals were treated as being normal, like an arm or a leg, the word 'rape' wouldnt exist, or it would be seen as equal to physical assault or some other much less serious crime
 
Everyone has a biological need for sex and everyone should have a reasonable prospect of gaining access to it through marriage. This includes the mentally or physically disabled - although society should take steps to prevent those people from reproducing. Inceldom or sexual starvation is probably the most commonly experienced type of (subjective) social isolation and research shows it to be at least as unhealthy as smoking and possibly more harmful.

When women are allowed to engage in casual sex, sex becomes a commodity that gets monopolized by a minority of attractive men. Because in modern society most young women are neither virgins nor married, rape should not be seen as a violation of a woman's chastity or loyalty to her husband, but rather as a type of theft. A slut typically enjoys being objectified and used by men that she is attracted to but complains when an unattractive man objectifies and uses her against her will. Because ugly men are condemned to inceldom in societies where female promiscuity is rampant, every slut bears a degree of responsibility for their suffering.

It may be wrong for a starving man to steal food, but his crime is much more understandable than that of a person who steals merely for personal gain. Similarly, it may be wrong for a sexually starved man to rape a debased slut, but doing so isn't anywhere near as immoral as raping a chaste virgin.

For a normie to say that incels aren't entitled to sex is just as stupid as telling a homeless man that he isn't entitled to shelter or a starving person that he isn't entitled to food. Everyone wants to protect their physical and mental health, and being deprived of sex for extended periods of time is harmful to both.

Also, male-male rape is worse than male-female rape because women's bodies have evolved to be penetrated by men.

The reason why I do not consider rape to be horrible is simply that IT DOES NOT INVOLVE ANY PHYSICAL INJURY. (I am speaking here of female rape. Male rape, which happens all the time in our wonderful egalitarian prison system, where black equals white and weak equals strong, is often accompanied by injury to the anus.) OK, maybe the victim is traumatized, but more than likely, she pretty much gets over it after a few days and after she has had her Wasserman test and maybe her penicillin. (As the San Francisco Chronicle's gossip columnist and wit Herb Cain was known for saying in a takeoff on Tennyson's famous line, "Better to fail your Wasserman test/Than never to have loved at all.") Yes, being traumatized by rape can happen, but this is rare as far as I know and is certainly not something that compels us to classify rape in general as 'horrible'. Indeed, as I have pointed out elsewhere, until recent times most women were introduced to sex by the act of rape: A woman was regarded as the husband's property, and was married under the directive to 'obey' him, and indeed was married in a ceremony accompanied by the husband's 'best man', who turns out to have traditionally been the 'best man' the husband could find to help him ABDUCT HIS BRIDE.
 
High IQ

JFL if you would risk your life to save a woman from rape
 

Similar threads

Clavicus Vile
Replies
2
Views
135
WorthlessSlavicShit
WorthlessSlavicShit
Friezacel
Replies
109
Views
2K
The Scarlet Prince
The Scarlet Prince
B33troot
Replies
12
Views
396
Abou Baldiaby
Abou Baldiaby
Stupid Clown
Replies
7
Views
605
Stupid Clown
Stupid Clown

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top