Serious If your IQ is below 156 SD 15, you are retarded

[Horatio Alger]

The cutoff for top 1 in 10,000 for whites is approx. 156 IQ
Same for U.S. norms as well

IQ Percentile and Rarity Chart

www.iqcomparisonsite.com

10,000 is about the population for a small town or city in America, so being the smartest out of 10,000 randomly selected whites is within the normal range of intelligence

44-156 IQ (white and U.S. norms) is within the biologically normal range of intelligence, ie, midwits

 

[lowz1r]

why havent there been iq eugenics yet jfl.

 

[Horatio Alger]

why havent there been iq eugenics yet jfl.

WW2 wrong ending

 

[Grodd]

No IQ for your face.

 

[FastBlast]

How can I find out what my IQ is for free?

 

[CosmicInjustice]

Ok.

 

[PLA1092]

Holy shit nigga shut up. I have no idea how people respond to your threads seriously, it's like a 6'4 person constantly posting here about how they're not truly tall, in fact they're turbomanlet and thus everyone should pity them. An IQ of 150 is well enough to find success in almost any field and mog most people you will ever interact with.

 

[PLA1092]

Holy shit nigga shut up. I have no idea how people respond to your threads seriously, it's like a 6'4 person constantly posting here about how they're not truly tall, in fact they're turbomanlet and thus everyone should pity them. An IQ of 150 is well enough to find success in almost any field and mog most people you will ever interact with.

It's not like you're showing any hard objective proof of anything either. Guys the standard of normal is being the smartest out of 15000 randomly selected whites, I declare it so!

 

[Horatio Alger]

It's not like you're showing any hard objective proof of anything either. Guys the standard of normal is being the smartest out of 15000 randomly selected whites, I declare it so!

A near threatened (NT) status on the IUCN Red List applies to species that have been evaluated against the Red List criteria and don’t qualify for critically endangered, endangered, or vulnerable status. However, they are close to qualifying for a threatened category or are likely to qualify in the near future.

This means the species is close to meeting one or more of the following criteria:

• A 10% or higher chance of becoming extinct in the next 100 years
• 10,000 or fewer mature individuals in total
• 1,000 or fewer mature individuals per subpopulation
• A continuing population decline of 10% or more in ten years
• An extent of occurrence (EOO) of less than 20,000 square kilometers (12,400 square miles)
• An area of occupancy (AOO) of less than 2,000 square kilometers (1,200 square miles)
• A population reduction of 50% or more over the past ten years or three generations

Since 10,000 is considered the amount of individuals for a species to be considered near threatened, top 1 in 10,000 is within the biologically normal range of intelligence (156 IQ white norms on a normalized curve)

White mean IQ: 103.4 SD 14

Since top 1 in 10,000 has a z-score of approx. 3.73, that would be 103.4 + 14 (3.73) = approx. 156

 

[VλREN]

Mine is around 85 or something


View: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=jLHZ-5M0gVw&pp=ygUTbWF4IHBheW5lIGdvZGRhbW5pdNIHCQnDCQGHKiGM7w%3D%3D

 

[Rapistcel]

The cutoff for top 1 in 10,000 for whites is approx. 156 IQ
Same for U.S. norms as well
View attachment 1475364

IQ Percentile and Rarity Chart

www.iqcomparisonsite.com

10,000 is about the population for a small town or city in America, so being the smartest out of 10,000 randomly selected whites is within the normal range of intelligence

44-156 IQ (white and U.S. norms) is within the biologically normal range of intelligence, ie, midwits

Whatever you say

 

[coping_manlet]

Interesting how blacks are comparable to other races like Hispanics or curries, but when it comes to the perceptual reasoning category they dip into the 80s, which is defined as actual mental retardation

It’s like they HAVE the capacity to be smart, but are just awful decision makers and have such low impulse control that they can’t ever actually get there

 

[poorenglishcel]

This nigga has 5000 IQ and since i am his trainer i have even higher IQ

 

[Allah (Real)]

fr though what are you on about, has this all been bait?
top 1 out of 10k standards to not be considered "retarded" or "midwit" is wild

Holy shit nigga shut up. I have no idea how people respond to your threads seriously, it's like a 6'4 person constantly posting here about how they're not truly tall, in fact they're turbomanlet and thus everyone should pity them. An IQ of 150 is well enough to find success in almost any field and mog most people you will ever interact with.

 

[Horatio Alger]

fr though what are you on about, has this all been bait?
top 1 out of 10k standards to not be considered "retarded" or "midwit" is wild

I am not trolling. If I WAS trolling, I would give subtle hints + reveal it in the post afterwards

I genuinely believe that if your IQ is below 160, you're a midwit


A population of 10,000 or less is one threshold for a species to be considered near threatened

10,000 humans is about the population of a small town of city in the U.S.

So 10,000 representative individuals are within the biologically normal range for humans with no freak mutants (+160 IQ, Gigachad, +6'9 height, et cetera)

Ergo, top 1 in 10,000 intellect, ie, 156 IQ SD 15 (white and U.S. norms) is the threshold for decent IQ

 

[UnchargedSamsung]

my iq is 149 I’m retarded



Skibidididiahxochans

 

[Horatio Alger]

fr though what are you on about, has this all been bait?
top 1 out of 10k standards to not be considered "retarded" or "midwit" is wild

Also, this is either top 1 in 10,000 among a representative sample of U.S. whites, or top 1 in 10,000 among a representative sample of U.S. citizens

Among blacks, being 156 IQ (U.S. norms) would be approx. +4.7 SD or top 1 in a 1,000,000 among blacks

Being 156 IQ (white norms) for a black would also be approx. top 1 in a 1,000,000 among blacks

 

[Horatio Alger]

my iq is 149 I’m retarded

If you are trolling, I agree

If, by slim chance, you were telling the truth, I still agree

 

[Butane]

Obvious bait

 

[Horatio Alger]

Obvious bait

I am not trolling. If I WAS trolling, I would give subtle hints + reveal it in the post afterwards

I genuinely believe that if your IQ is below 160, you're a midwit


A population of 10,000 or less is one threshold for a species to be considered near threatened

10,000 humans is about the population of a small town of city in the U.S.

So 10,000 representative individuals are within the biologically normal range for humans with no freak mutants (+160 IQ, Gigachad, +6'9 height, et cetera)

Ergo, top 1 in 10,000 intellect, ie, 156 IQ SD 15 (white and U.S. norms) is the threshold for decent IQ

I am not trolling. This is what I genuinely believe since 10,000 individuals is considered one threshold for a species to be considered near threatened by biologists, you need above 10,000 to not be considered near threatened

ergo top 1 in 10,000 in IQ among a sample of representative whites is within the biologically normal range of intellect

 

[Joseph The Judge]

A near threatened (NT) status on the IUCN Red List applies to species that have been evaluated against the Red List criteria and don’t qualify for critically endangered, endangered, or vulnerable status. However, they are close to qualifying for a threatened category or are likely to qualify in the near future.

This means the species is close to meeting one or more of the following criteria:

• A 10% or higher chance of becoming extinct in the next 100 years
• 10,000 or fewer mature individuals in total
• 1,000 or fewer mature individuals per subpopulation
• A continuing population decline of 10% or more in ten years
• An extent of occurrence (EOO) of less than 20,000 square kilometers (12,400 square miles)
• An area of occupancy (AOO) of less than 2,000 square kilometers (1,200 square miles)
• A population reduction of 50% or more over the past ten years or three generations

Since 10,000 is considered the amount of individuals for a species to be considered near threatened, top 1 in 10,000 is within the biologically normal range of intelligence (156 IQ white norms on a normalized curve)

White mean IQ: 103.4 SD 14

Since top 1 in 10,000 has a z-score of approx. 3.73, that would be 103.4 + 14 (3.73) = approx. 156

what does an arbitary chosen limit that defines "endangered species" have anything to do with being a midwit? and why is being a "midwit" a problem if you'll be able to surpass any normal human and thrive in any intellectual domain?

 

[bcroger]

why havent there been iq eugenics yet jfl.

FAR too complicated.

 

[Horatio Alger]

what does an arbitary chosen limit that defines "endangered species" have anything to do with being a midwit? and why is being a "midwit" a problem if you'll be able to surpass any normal human and thrive in any intellectual domain?

Near threatened species, not endangered

It midwit since midwit is defined as mediocre intellect, and having above 10,000 individuals is a requirement for a species to not be considered near threatened by biologists, implying above 10,000 individuals is the bare minimum of what a thriving species should be

So being top 1 in 10,000 among a representative sample of whites is within the biologically normal range of human intelligence and nothing particularly exceptional (above 10,000 is one requirement for a species to be of least concern)

 

[Horatio Alger]

FAR too complicated.

You laserfocus on Zionist control over US foreign policy but neglect the wokism some of them proliferated beyond academica that prevents invasive human experimentation + genetic sequencing of populations that take IQ tests

Even with just common genetic variants, Steven Hsu can predict IQ within countries with a correlation of 0.4 (rare and non-additive genetic variants can't be screened due to lack of funding plus wokism)

Data and theory point to mainly additive genetic variance for complex traits - PubMed

The relative proportion of additive and non-additive variation for complex traits is important in evolutionary biology, medicine, and agriculture. We address a long-standing controversy and paradox about the contribution of non-additive genetic variation, namely that knowledge about biological...

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

Most of the genome is additive

There seems to be a belief among some in the comment section that genetic effects are not (primarily) additive. By additive, we mean that by adding the gene, we will add to your phenotype; for exam…

pumpkinperson.com

Interviews with Steve Hsu

So I’ve been watching youtubers interview Steve Hsu. The first interview I saw was done by some Israeli, the second one I watched was by a guy of South Asian descent, and the third was some w…

pumpkinperson.com

 

[erenyeager]

why havent there been iq eugenics yet jfl.

That would require killing a lot of chads


And women

 

[erenyeager]

Mine is around 85 or something


View: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=jLHZ-5M0gVw&pp=ygUTbWF4IHBheW5lIGdvZGRhbW5pdNIHCQnDCQGHKiGM7w%3D%3D

Is that why you have organic ramblings sometimes

 

[Horatio Alger]

That would require killing a lot of chads


And women

Sterilizing is also an option. But I don't think there is a negative correlation btw IQ and looks

 

[erenyeager]

Ok.

I will physically beat the fuck out of your avi

 

[erenyeager]

Sterilizing is also an option. But I don't think there is a negative correlation btw IQ and looks

If you legit believe theirs no correlation between Chad women and retardation then I’m afraid I have some news that might excite you.

 

[Joseph The Judge]

Near threatened species, not endangered

It midwit since midwit is defined as mediocre intellect, and having above 10,000 individuals is a requirement for a species to not be considered near threatened by biologists, implying above 10,000 individuals is the bare minimum of what a thriving species should be

So being top 1 in 10,000 among a representative sample of whites is within the biologically normal range of human intelligence and nothing particularly exceptional (above 10,000 is one requirement for a species to be of least concern)

1- midwit is mediocre intellece by definition
2- 10k capita is the bare minimum to not be considered "near threatened" by biologists,
so 10k is the bare minimum of what a thriving species should be
concludes:
being alongside the top 0.01 percentage (3.73 SD) of intellect is within the biologically normal range of human intelligence
what you said only implies that being within top 0.01% makes you an outsider of the species
and so having top 0.01% iq is an outside of the species of yt
which defines you as a biologically nearly endangerd black non-human filth
another brutal non-human pill

 

[Horatio Alger]

what you said only implies that being within top 0.01% makes you an outsider of the species
and so having top 0.01% iq is an outside of the species of yt

It means that past IQ 156 (white and U.S. norms), you are a genetic freak of nature (good thing)

 

[Joseph The Judge]

you are a genetic freak of nature (good thing)

but by definition "midwit" is someone with mediocore intelligence, you don't need to be a genetic freak of nature to not be midwit coded,
a midwit is someone above average intelligence, but is not remarkable to be "gifted" or "genius", something like top 50% to top 10% is what define midwittery, the reason my comment was overly sarcastic is because redefining "midwit" to be top 0.01% intelligence is non-sensical, the term emerged to describe individuals who are above average intelligence, but lack enough intelligence to feel confident in their intelligence (example being you), so they engage in bonnobo chimpanzee behaviours to constantly proof their intelligence (correcting other people grammar cosntantl, engaging intellectual activities that don't cross over what their current truth regime dictate(seeing as if they are incapable of proper introspection)), the term emerged to mock this group of people, redefining the term to describe top 0.01% is not only non sensical, but non-pragmatic

 

[Horatio Alger]

but by definition "midwit" is someone with mediocore intelligence, you don't need to be a genetic freak of nature to not be midwit coded,
a midwit is someone above average intelligence, but is not remarkable to be "gifted" or "genius", something like top 50% to top 10% is what define midwittery, the reason my comment was overly sarcastic is because redefining "midwit" to be top 0.01% intelligence is non-sensical, the term emerged to describe individuals who are above average intelligence, but lack enough intelligence to feel confident in their intelligence (example being you), so they engage in bonnobo chimpanzee behaviours to constantly proof their intelligence (correcting other people grammar cosntantl, engaging intellectual activities that don't cross over what their current truth regime dictate(seeing as if they are incapable of proper introspection)), the term emerged to mock this group of people, redefining the term to describe top 0.01% is not only non sensical, but non-pragmatic

Human beings are extremely dumb, so being less than +4 standard deviations above the average for whites is still pretty dumb in the grand scheme of things + common (less than 1 in a 1,000,000 rarity)

 

[Joseph The Judge]

Human beings are extremely dumb, so being less than +4 standard deviations above the average for whites is still pretty dumb in the grand scheme of things

being above the biological limit that defines nearly-threatened population is also pretty dumb in the grand scheme of things

 

[Horatio Alger]

being above the biological limit that defines nearly-threatened population is also pretty dumb in the grand scheme of things

Well, considering the near cavernous gap btw those with IQs of 140-150 with just those with 170 or even 160 at the top levels (perfect pre 1995 SAT or gold medal IMO), I think it's the right standard for genius

I know from personal experience and that of others online that there are some cognitive limitations at 150 IQ level (U.S. and white norms) that those with one in a million intellect don't have. Extremely flexible mindz that can make several connections btw disparate fields and understand basic material at a deep, intuitive level that borders on instinct

You can see them effortlessly solve problems through manipulation of basic concepts that would confound I and others with 150 IQ, whether that be Math Olympiad problems or subtle logic paradoxes

 

[Joseph The Judge]

Well, considering the near cavernous gap btw those with IQs of 140-150 with just those with 170 or even 160 at the top levels (perfect pre 1995 SAT or gold medal IMO), I think it's the right standard for genius

I know from personal experience and that of others online that there are some cognitive limitations at 150 IQ level (U.S. and white norms) that those with one in a million intellect don't have. Extremely flexible mindz that can make several connections btw disparate fields and understand basic material at a deep, intuitive level that borders on instinct

i agree with everything you said in here, but the problem is with your assertion that everything that is not super natural by human range is "midwit-coded", midwit is an insult used to mock intellecuals who can't ascend behind the horizon of their truth regime

 

[Horatio Alger]

i agree with everything you said in here, but the problem is with your assertion that everything that is not super natural by human range is "midwit-coded", midwit is an insult used to mock intellecuals who can't ascend behind the horizon of their truth regime

Any moron with an IQ above 120 and an inquisitive personality would ascend your soi distant truth regime

This is about being a genius that transcends mere mortal human beings

 

[Joseph The Judge]

Any moron with an IQ above 120 and an inquisitive personality would ascend your soi distant truth regime

exactly, except i'll cap the midwit territory at 130 iq (top 2%), making anyone who isn't from the top 0.01% of intelligence a midwit makes the term oversaturated, the term loses its meaning which is my entire point.

 

[Horatio Alger]

exactly, except i'll cap the midwit territory at 130 iq (top 2%), making anyone who isn't from the top 0.01% of intelligence a midwit makes the term oversaturated, the term loses its meaning which is my entire point.

So what if it loses meaning to normies and those with above average intelligence? I don't particularly care for the opinion of those dumber than I am + midwit is a meme word that has become a catch all term like Nazi for most normies already

the term emerged to describe individuals who are above average intelligence, but lack enough intelligence to feel confident in their intelligence (example being you)

Also, if we use your threshold of 130 IQ for midwit territory, I would be well beyond that at +150 composite IQ SD 15 on a professionally administered psychometric test at age 10 + a scholastic test last year, so watch your tongue

https://incels.is/threads/my-iq-and-scholastic-test-scores.747908/