In reality no or very few women are model tier with perfect face attributes. A 6/10 asian chick looks the same as an asian chick who is really good with makeup and can boost herself to a 9/10. Of course this assuming they aren’t overweight
If you take makeup out of the equation most women are actually pretty similar in looks to one another
Also if u were to take makeup out tof the equation the porn business would be finished. Men would not be addicted to just seeing a regular every day chick with big tits getting fucked. Take away makeup=no hypergamy
no makeup for their tits
Tits or ass alone isnt enough to make a man simp imo
theorycrafting level 100
Especially the fake eyelashes man
Sydney sweeney or whatever looks HORRID without makeup
I hate how deceiving it all is
There are no female 10s.
?
The variability hypothesis states that males in general have more variability than females. That is, if you were to plot specific quantifiable traits onto a distribution curve, the female curve's standard deviation would be lower.
example, blue curve would be female.
statistical support for this theory:
now obviously the means are different, but you can see that the standard deviations are also different.
as for the reasoning behind this, an excellent male specimen can reproduce with many females in quick succession, but the same cannot be said for females. this reasoning is actually the same basis for the female vs. male mate selection psychology, but I digress.
we can assume this applies to looks too. it should theoretically look something like that graph with the blue and green curve. this is also why there are so many more male models that stand out compared to the rest of the population compared to female models. the male ceiling is theoretically higher in a practical sense too. so yes, women are closer to each other in looks than men are.
honestly, ban makeup. it contributes a ridiculous amount to the overinflated egos of foids and male simpery. and the chemicals from them are poisoning our water supplies.
Last edited:
?
male models mog their female counterparts to oblivion, no makeup needed.
Its hilarious because the only reason she became asexual symbol is because shes blonde and showed her tits. Basically she made herself sexually available to the public similar to a pornstar so its easier for men to lust after her
This right here. Take makeup away and hypergamy would not exist. Women would basically just be engaging in the dating market the same as men
?
observation would show this is false, normgroid will simp over anything with ass and tits
High effort post. Good looks brotherThe variability hypothesis states that males in general have more variability than females. That is, if you were to plot specific quantifiable traits onto a distribution curve, the female curve's standard deviation would be lower.
example, blue curve would be female.
statistical support for this theory:
now obviously the means are different, but you can see that the standard deviations are also different.
as for the reasoning behind this, an excellent male specimen can reproduce with many females in quick succession, but the same cannot be said for females. this reasoning is actually the same basis for the female vs. male mate selection psychology, but I digress.
we can assume this applies to looks too. it should theoretically look something like that graph with the blue and green curve. this is also why there are so many more male models that stand out compared to the rest of the population compared to female models. the male ceiling is theoretically higher in a practical sense too. so yes, women are closer to each other in looks than men are.
honestly, ban makeup. it contributes a ridiculous amount to the overinflated egos of foids and male simpery. and the chemicals from them are poisoning our water supplies.
P
Only a small percentage of humans mog, I simply don't respect mid-level people being aggressive towards people like us. I don't care what society thinks I won't treat a plain bitch with clown makeup as hot.
?
it would probably be helpful but to say the same is hopeful.
even the average female has significantly higher SMV than a HTN nowadays.
just the psychology of female vs. male mate selection.
females only want the best of the best while males will fuck anything above a 2
Right wingers?
I disagree. Its kind of convoluted but men only simp for ass and tits because they have already had it planted in their mind to simp for women by the 9s and 10s. When their simping for mid their doing it because they have already built up full pussy worship in their heads. They would fuck the mid chick imagining she is the top tier girl he actually wants
Exactly. Dudes who would basically simp for anything blonde with big tits
They're cringe enough
?
Pussy worship is the default state for normies, though. They're more or less born like that. Males really do care as much or more about the holes compared to the face. An excellent face is a plus, but anything that's good enough will do. And there are many that are good enough, due to aforementioned lower standard deviation in terms of looks. You've got to trust and believe on this, chad slays beckies not only because it's easier to get into her pants for him, but also because he wouldn't mind her face. If what you said is true, there's no reason to assume that chads would go for anyone outside of their looksmatches.
?
your point wasn't that men would prefer a better looking woman, but rather that it is of great importance to them, at least in terms of sex. obviously, a chad would probably put significantly more effort into marrying someone who's better looking. you invoked sex by making the statement that men will imagine a better looking chick during the act with a worse looking one, which implies good looks is necessary for women to get sex. this is false, reference Juggernaut's Law. chad will slay becky without a care that she isn't a facial 8/10. but stacy will not slay a MTN in the same situation.
keep in mind, chad is not "staying around" beckies no matter if they have makeup on or not, he's just using them as temporary relief. and the average sex starved looksmatch of that becky will simp for her no matter if she has makeup on or not, he'll just simp harder if she does. I'm not saying makeup doesn't elevate the female SMV, I'm just saying that it's a drop in an ocean.
I honestly disagree but still respect your opinion and the high effort post.
Sexual fulfillment is diminishing returns. After u have already got ure fill on an actually attractive chick u arent getting that much fulfillment from banging a chick who isnt up to your standards. I would argue its not that much more fulfilling than masturbating. Your just doing it for bragging rights and to imagine ure banging a top tier when her face is down in the pillow
?
You'd be surprised, the male mate selection instinct makes sex with one person boring after a while. This is the most principal reason men cheat. It's also one of the reasons why people develop odd fetishes, overconsumption of one category of porn made their brain bored of it (obviously this is an unnatural consequence of unnatural actions, but it uses the same pathways). As for the reason why, in nature males have much to benefit from impregnating multiple females. If he impregnates one female, he could have as much sex with her as possible and yet for the next 9 months no extra children would be produced. Even though she is top tier, he has no reason to keep having sex with her. It would be more efficient in terms of reproduction to direct that energy towards impregnating other females. Even if they're not the best genetic material, that child will still be his, and he would still have succeeded in reproducing more. Furthermore, females that are pregnant are unable to get pregnant even if they're bred by other males.
Remember, all natural processes fall into the categories of optimizing survival or optimizing reproduction, and this falls into the latter.
I'll have to disagree with this, if sex wasn't much better I don't think we'd be on here. Masturbation is missing many of the neurochemical signals involved in sex, it's why sex dolls do better. Still, even they must pale in comparison to the real thing; the mind is an intricately woven place requiring very specific stimuli that we are far from imitating through technology, much less our hands.
likewise, thank you for offering conversation instead of ignoring or spamming
Not only is variability different, I stand firm on the fact that an average male is a lot better looking than an average female.
I'm not gay at all, but since childhood, even before girls wore makeup, it was clear to me that women were straight up ugly, that's why I had only a few crushes as a kid, but when girls tits started growing it all changed.
I'm not gay at all, but since childhood, even before girls wore makeup, it was clear to me that women were straight up ugly, that's why I had only a few crushes as a kid, but when girls tits started growing it all changed.
?
Honestly, I think this is solely because women are never expected to improve.
I was surprised at how dogshit the habits of females are. They don't eat well, scroll all day, don't exercise, generally don't give a fuck.
They can have neckbeard basement dweller neet levels of habits the likes of which even we have never seen, and it will actually increase her SMV because of Juggernaut's Law.
This leads them to have eyebags, uneven faces, fat deposits, etc.
Brutal world, man.
"Why do girls wear makeup and perfume? Because they're ugly and they stink."
-Clyde from Southpark
-Clyde from Southpark
Similar threads
Ellsworth
Users who are viewing this thread
