D
Id choose short women
if you had to genocide any group of people, which would it be?
The non-white ones
all of them. 1 extra shot in the black ones
The ones who bully others off of things they can't control.
Examples being: looks, your autism, your iq etc.
Examples being: looks, your autism, your iq etc.
D
so everyone
This or tall men/chads.
D
Every man except me
A
yes, gotta rapemaxx tall ones if you are a shortcel tho
Bullies
Yeah pretty much lol
A
have you been called عموري by your mom or a relative? cuz your name is likely عمار then.
i got called حمودي by cousins back in the day
i really hate it
Kikes and mutts(like myself)
Niggers kikes gays and troons
women
Noodles. End ricecel suffering.
That's really funny, how you guessed my name, but yeah, my mom calls me that.. I don't hate it that much, actually quite fond of ithave you been called عموري by your mom or a relative? cuz your name is likely عمار then.
i got called حمودي by cousins back in the day
A
well, عموري is popular for عمار here so
zionists
B
Genocide is not morally unjustifiable in any way that's apparent to me. I'm open to any arguments to the contrary, but I think it would be extremely difficult and bordering on the fantastical.
So the entirety of the human race
What you expect from organic creatures. I mean c'mon they are ORGANIC. silly barbaric caveman animal world is the only thing they will ever know and think that's special to them
B
Bro how long are you going to keep this schizo larp going? Aren't you getting bored?
I literally said the truth. I just have zero patience for the organisms of earth. I ain't getting laid I might as well criticize every single fuck wad of a creature that hates me for no reason. Including people, my own fucking RACE of a species hates me for no reason and half of the time I just sit there quietly hoping to actually be alone and talk my thoughts out privately.
But nah man it's always me that has to be hated on.
I wa conceived then boom I am hated.
I genuinely miss not being born. I actually missed it when people would actually talk to me without no punchline to punch me down every single. Fucking. Time.
Last edited:
Based
B
You're a misanthrope, I understand. You have good reason to be.
I wish I was larping but I am serious. Fuck the biosphere. I can't think of a single time where a relative lifeform of earth treated me good (outside from family) LITERALLY THE UNIVERSE I KNOW IS DOING THIS SHIT ON PURPOSE why else am I to be born and half of the time where the corrections SHOULD FUCKING BE THERE IT IS NOT AND ITS JUST INCORRECTIONS AND IM SENT ON MY OWN WAY AND I haven't been a free agent in life since because life is FUCKING TRYING TO GET ME
B
What kind of corrections or incorrections?
Since morality is metaphysical, any moral justification must eventually fall back on moral axioms that can only be justified by circular reasoning. Instead, those axioms are perhaps better thought of as unjustifiable "obvious" moral truths. "Murder is bad" (or something along these lines) commonly seems to be one of those moral axioms in my admittedly rather limited experience. My point is that moral justifications are rather arbitrary unless common axioms are agreed upon.
Last edited:
jews
Redditors
That I did everything I saw that would logically get me the golden life every single fuck in the manosphere keeps talking about. But instead I am autistic. I thought people would look past it but they won't. Same with height. They won't. I am mixed race burgermutt and I thought they'd look past it. They won't. All of the corrections I thought that should be implemented in reality have been robbed. Robbed by the fact that I HAVE ALL THE NEGATIVE TRAITS THAT WOULD MAKE THE HUMAN EXPERIENCE A LIVING HELL. I still can't come to terms with how the biosphere treats me because I was born this way. In truth I should've gotten my golden life. I was good I did everything that by logic should get me it. But I was robbed. My birthright gone. I deserved it all because I had a clean slate when I was born. But obviously reality has other plans. I can't believe fuckers love colored eye pale white people with blonde hair that talk like a wannabe black person with piece rings up to tim buk tu and watch shit tok and act like a complete animal to me because I am different and so they can just be incharge of me.
I just had to be sent my own way. The fucking corrections THEY ARE OUT THERE BEGGING FOR ME TO FUCKING RETURN I'm so tired too.
gigabased
B
Are numbers metaphysical? Are abstract concepts, in fact, metaphysical?
I don't know what I did to deserve this by REALITY I SHOULD BE WINNING. THERES BEEN INCORRECTIOMS DETECTED MOTHERFUCKERS
Aren't they?
B
I wouldn't classify concepts as metaphysical. Here I define metaphysical as pertaining to the nature of being and supraphysical (above the physical, categorically primary where the physical is secondary, and also ordinally preceding the physical). I think abstract and metaphysical are not synonymous, and that the two are sometimes conflated, such as now. Words and numbers, for example, are both abstract concepts that map very accurately to the concrete world (numbers more so than words), and they both capture concepts in the logos that are used for them. They both originate - and are are purely conjured up - from imagination. To say that both words and numbers are metaphysical would necessarily imply that imagination and all constructs of the mind are metaphysical. Since imagination is nothing more than thoughts, and since thoughts are the product of physical processes in the mind, the concepts derived and produced from those thoughts cannot, by definition, be metaphysical, because the physical is subordinate to the metaphysical.
Therefore morality is not necessarily metaphysical.
Mosquitos
B
Moral justifications are provided through the moral system from which the justifications (reasons) operate. That in and of itself is not circular. Take the three major systems of non-religious ethics: virtue ethics, utilitarian ethics, and deontological ethics. They all can provide logically consistent arguments for why action x is moral/immoral, but using another moral system to deconstruct the moral reasoning provided by one moral system may or may not yield the same result. A similar conclusion might be reached, but the reasons will clearly be different, none of which will be circular.
As far as axiomatic morality goes, I've tried very diligently to develop moral axioms in order to construct a rigorous moral system, but it's proven to be extremely difficult, if not impossible, because edge cases always seem to appear under some set of conditions. Even the axiom of, "murder is immoral/morally bad/morally negative," can have a plausible edge case where it may be justifiable to commit murder. Why? Because it could, hypothetically, save lives in the immediate. An example could be a madman who orders you to kill an innocent person or they will detonate a nuclear bomb killing millions. Variations of this hypothetical are typical in discussions of the contrast between utilitarianism and deontology.
Metaethically, I don't think ethics are amenable to axiomatization. If it is, in fact, possible, it may be a problem of complexity. The space of possible moral agentic decisions (actions a thing with agency, such as a person, can take) is a subset of the space of all possible agentic decisions (because some decisions have a null moral value).
Last edited:
B
Mosquitos are people?
Thought he asked anything
B
Completely over for ADHD DNRcels.
Similar threads
Users who are viewing this thread
