No greater fallacy in history of mankind.
Never hope to believe your heart, or soul will be a lasting factor in a woman finding you interesting.
It's all dominarchical competencies like power, dominance, eliteness, etc.
Those are the dominarchical accessories that make for genetic domination value.
We live in a society. Or so they say.
People should act like a laidback maverick like han solo/ clint eastwood or some shit from the sheer amount of how much being friendly is not valued in many cases.
I mean... you can be funny witty charming but like us that's like a distraction away from what we truly want given enough time for the knowledge of their merit to marinate in relation to everything we TRULY WANT.
Most guys wouldn't want a girl who is just funny, charming, amusing if she isn't even that hot.
The uniformity/ patterns of our genome tells of the solidity of our nature.
And the solidities are unbreakable and often run the show/ environment/ atmosphere of who we are.
Liquid/ variable traits... on the other hand are malleable, but it's the solids that are usually the ones that are hard wired.
Things in nature don't often stay the same unless they are bolted/ hard-locked in some way.
And our genes are vastly encoded.
Anyway, on being affectionate...
Women don't want that from Chads. And Chads are their dream. They want cold, heartless, wolflike elitism.
They may appreciate niceness here or there when they're in emotional scarcity.
But every woman's aspirations are narcissistic. They won't like emotional love-lettering/ launchpadding for long.
We are vain creatures.
All non-edgy/ mid of center/ laidbackish outlooks are lies.
They don't seek love/ affection when they're without it because they want to make the world a nice place.
But because they are ego hungry, and feel famished from that. But ultimately when they get the love they want they will use it vainly, and flaunt, whore, feel powerful and among the hierarchy/ top men.
They crave that pleasure in freedom more than virtue.
In this age where we all know that nihilism is real, and virtues are just a lie... used to be fronts/ intangible veneers for being tangible failures.
Either you act vain or you just failed to be vain in the minds of foids.
The only love they really want is how Chad sees them. Which is only appreciated/ reciprocated by them if you are Chad. Which is to esteem them for only superficial value because they feel that that's all that is genuine love. By primal/ superficial perspective. All else is just non-material and a fake referral to something as an excuse for lacking superficial value.
Women want everything primal/ superficial/ uninspired/ unindepth.
Women I'd argue are more superficial than men, and they have to be because they're the frail gender so they have ot look for manliness/ robustness/ physical power in a mate because physical value is far more of a thing they lack than guys do.
If you are a softie at heart, then harden it because you're only gonna get your soft sentiments broken with women.
Never hope to believe your heart, or soul will be a lasting factor in a woman finding you interesting.
It's all dominarchical competencies like power, dominance, eliteness, etc.
Those are the dominarchical accessories that make for genetic domination value.
We live in a society. Or so they say.
People should act like a laidback maverick like han solo/ clint eastwood or some shit from the sheer amount of how much being friendly is not valued in many cases.
I mean... you can be funny witty charming but like us that's like a distraction away from what we truly want given enough time for the knowledge of their merit to marinate in relation to everything we TRULY WANT.
Most guys wouldn't want a girl who is just funny, charming, amusing if she isn't even that hot.
The uniformity/ patterns of our genome tells of the solidity of our nature.
And the solidities are unbreakable and often run the show/ environment/ atmosphere of who we are.
Liquid/ variable traits... on the other hand are malleable, but it's the solids that are usually the ones that are hard wired.
Things in nature don't often stay the same unless they are bolted/ hard-locked in some way.
And our genes are vastly encoded.
Anyway, on being affectionate...
Women don't want that from Chads. And Chads are their dream. They want cold, heartless, wolflike elitism.
They may appreciate niceness here or there when they're in emotional scarcity.
But every woman's aspirations are narcissistic. They won't like emotional love-lettering/ launchpadding for long.
We are vain creatures.
All non-edgy/ mid of center/ laidbackish outlooks are lies.
They don't seek love/ affection when they're without it because they want to make the world a nice place.
But because they are ego hungry, and feel famished from that. But ultimately when they get the love they want they will use it vainly, and flaunt, whore, feel powerful and among the hierarchy/ top men.
They crave that pleasure in freedom more than virtue.
In this age where we all know that nihilism is real, and virtues are just a lie... used to be fronts/ intangible veneers for being tangible failures.
Either you act vain or you just failed to be vain in the minds of foids.
The only love they really want is how Chad sees them. Which is only appreciated/ reciprocated by them if you are Chad. Which is to esteem them for only superficial value because they feel that that's all that is genuine love. By primal/ superficial perspective. All else is just non-material and a fake referral to something as an excuse for lacking superficial value.
Women want everything primal/ superficial/ uninspired/ unindepth.
Women I'd argue are more superficial than men, and they have to be because they're the frail gender so they have ot look for manliness/ robustness/ physical power in a mate because physical value is far more of a thing they lack than guys do.
If you are a softie at heart, then harden it because you're only gonna get your soft sentiments broken with women.
Last edited:
