Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Theory If you don’t believe in Oofy doofy you’re a normie NPC

That's right. Oofy doofy is LAW. Move over chad. It's time for the oofy doofy to take his place in the sun
 
I don't like the title. It's similar to TV telling that if I don't obey them, I'm racist, sexist and unscientific.
The main antagonist is fucking ugly and that's coming from me.
Oofy doofy is something I should look into deeper. I'm still stuck on dogpill.
 
I don't like the title. It's similar to TV telling that if I don't obey them, I'm racist, sexist and unscientific.
The main antagonist is fucking ugly and that's coming from me.
Oofy doofy is something I should look into deeper. I'm still stuck on dogpill.
Dog pill is law too Lol:blackpill: but taking the Oofy doofy pill gets us so much closer to the end of the rabbit hole
 
Saying offy doofy works as an incel is like saying personality is what matters :bluepill:
 
Saying offy doofy works as an incel is like saying personality is what matters :bluepill:
Personality is what matters :bigbrain: women don’t care about looks it’s so much deeper then that do you think foids want a Chad whos alpha male and wants to stop there promiscuity and put them in thekitchen and is woke and deep no they want a Oofy doofy.
 
Personality is what matters :bigbrain: women don’t care about looks it’s so much deeper then that do you think foids want a Chad whos alpha male and wants to stop there promiscuity and put them in thekitchen and is woke and deep no they want a Oofy doofy.
ok GrAYcel.
 
Irony over written text is harder pick up.
 
Don't be a cunt, then.
1650950135861
 
You're autistic
No a 3/10 incel is a Chad and alpha male because of how he thinks, a lot of guys on this forum are incel because of their high IQ and they are way smarter then normies that’s why women don’t want them not because of how they look. Yes pretty boys can get women but that’s because they are Oofy doofy virtue signal the western ideology. Such as tik tok no one on this forum is on tik tok thus no women will want him :whitepill::feelstastyman:
 
What is oofy doofy? Sounds like a simp?
 
@based_meme you seeing this shit boyo:lul:
Thanks for tagging me. I'd be KEKing at this, if it weren't for the sad fact that these GrAYfags with brand new accounts are pushing this shit hard and trying to get the rest of us to take it seriously.

At least proponents like @Zer0/∞ make an honest effort.
 
What is oofy doofy? Sounds like a simp?
It's the theory that women in modern day, gynocentric, feminist societies prefer men who are losers (socially, financially) and have beta attributes. The reasoning goes that women in such societies have everything they would need that they were reliant on men on in previous societies, like resources and protection. So what they seek in men is exactly the things they're lacking and that current society fails to explicitly provide, which is a submissive and emotionally available, submissive man over whom they have complete control over.

The theory has logical validity, but it doesn't have a lot of real world concrete examples, and it fundamentally goes against lookism theory. Briffault's law and the black pill basically cover the fact that women are extremely utilitarian when it comes to men, which is probably how ODT (oofy doofy theory) came about. In modern Western societies women do seek the stereotypical chads and alphas, but chad doesn't fulfill the needs that those cuckish and simpish oofy doofies fulfill. So after they realize that chad is not controllable and not "emotionally available" for them, they seek those elsewhere.

Enter the oofy doofy male.
 
Last edited:
It's the theory that women in modern day, gynocentric, feminist societies prefer men who are losers (socially, financially) and have beta attributes. The reasoning goes that women in such societies have everything they would need that they were reliant on men on in previous societies, like resources and protection. So what they seek in men is exactly the things they're lacking and that current society fails to explicitly provide, which is a submissive and emotionally available, submissive man over whom they have complete control over.

The theory has logical validity, but it doesn't have a lot of real world concrete examples, and it fundamentally goes against lookism theory. Briffault's law and the black pill basically cover the fact that women are extremely utilitarian when it comes to men, which is probably how ODT (oofy doofy theory) came about. In modern Western societies women do seek the stereotypical chads and alphas, but chad doesn't fulfill the needs that those cuckish and simpish oofy doofies fulfill. So after they realize that chad is not controllable and not "emotionally available" for them, they seek those elsewhere.

Enter the oofy doofy male.
So basically it’s a simp
 
So basically it’s a simp
Not exactly. A simp in the traditional sense is a beta male who goes out of his way to offer help, money, moral defence etc. with no expectation - only the hope - of sexual and emotional reciprocation, whereas the oofy doofy may do these things with the expectation.

You can think of it like a simp who actually ascends, if it helps.

ODT doesn't really add anything new, but it does highlight the phenomenon I described earlier that happens in gynocentric societies. I just call it "repackaged betabuxx theory."
 
Last edited:
Not exactly. A simp in the traditional sense is a beta male who goes out of his way to offer help, money, moral defence etc. with no expectation - only the hope - of sexual and emotional reciprocation, whereas the oofy doofy may do these things with the expectation.

You can think of it like a simp who actually ascends, if it helps.

ODT doesn't really add anything new, but it does highlight the phenomenon I described earlier that happens in gynocentric societies. I just call it "repackaged betabuxx theory."
 

Attachments

  • 924C458E-F5EC-4977-8FAA-3A279143AD10.jpeg
    924C458E-F5EC-4977-8FAA-3A279143AD10.jpeg
    27.7 KB · Views: 11

Similar threads

RealSchizo
Replies
25
Views
732
Poindexter
Poindexter
Dusk-observer
Replies
39
Views
1K
Dusk-observer
Dusk-observer
Rapistcel
Replies
14
Views
727
Lazyandtalentless
Lazyandtalentless
daydreamER
Replies
6
Views
1K
DarkStar
DarkStar

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top