Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Experiment if woman always go for the top 20% of men, then who will work dead-end jobs?

jet112

jet112

Incelmatics
★★
Joined
May 13, 2018
Posts
2,148
lets face it, wageslaves and blue collar are much more important than white collar in terms of productivity. but not in terms of wage.
we need a truck driver and a construction worker much more than some IT faggot that makes 200k a year.

if low-status men die off. then who will 'run' the world?
this is the ultimate debate here. winners always win, but for winners to exist you need losers as well. which completely debunks the whole 'competition is good for everything' meme.
competition is good when you have 2 chimps that fight eachother to control the terrority. but human society is more complex than a bunch of fucking chimps.
this is not sexual socialism. call it whatever you like, but you can't prove me wrong.
 
Last edited:
AI will fix it. The reason why hypergamy was loosened by tinder is that the development of automation will replace more and more manual jobs, making low status men redundant. In the future chads will be living their Greek life with their harem of Stacys and getting all the shit work done by robots.
 
This is true until automation starves us all to death
 
Low status men wont die off since low status women will always be around and get to breed. So long as the women are there spreading their subhuman genetics to their offspring you'll always have a steady supply of wageslave and bluecollars.
 
Technology will make all those dead end jobs obsolete.
 
Technology will make all those dead end jobs obsolete.

Technology will also make women obsolete. I've played VR sex games and I have a sex doll, real women are not necessary.
 
AI will fix it. The reason why hypergamy was loosened by tinder is that the development of automation will replace more and more manual jobs, making low status men redundant. In the future chads will be living their Greek life with their harem of Stacys and getting all the shit work done by robots.

MUH AUTOMATION
there won't be any automation my dude. there is no AI.
the only AI that exists is the one that gives you amazon recommended products.
 
AI will fix it. The reason why hypergamy was loosened by tinder is that the development of automation will replace more and more manual jobs, making low status men redundant. In the future chads will be living their Greek life with their harem of Stacys and getting all the shit work done by robots.
/thread
 
MUH AUTOMATION
there won't be any automation my dude. there is no AI.
the only AI that exists is the one that gives you amazon recommended products.

finally someone that understands this

lmao ai is just pattern recognition, like identifying faces or objects in images

no ai can load a truck, strap the weight down correctly, drive in the rain, respond to a cop in traffic, etc.
 
The AI meme at it again.

Trucking, oil procurement, farms and aviation form the backbone of the global economy and none of them can be fully automated. Normies love the idea of self driving trucks but it's simply not possible and won't be for some time.
 
Normies love the idea of self driving trucks but it's simply not possible and won't be for some time.

is impossible, full stop.

loading a truck, balancing the load, hitching it up, etc. is incredibly complex and takes experience.
 
Women ride the cock carousel with top 20% Chads and Chadlites. Most settle with betabuxxes when older and used-up.
 
is impossible, full stop.

loading a truck, balancing the load, hitching it up, etc. is incredibly complex and takes experience.
What you will see is akin to modern airliners where the driver manages an autopilot on expressways but has to take manual control for city driving and yard operations. The technology will essentially just make trucking much safer and the trucks probably much larger and more efficient.

But the normie dream of all these jobs being automated is pure fantasy.
 
finally someone that understands this

lmao ai is just pattern recognition, like identifying faces or objects in images

no ai can load a truck, strap the weight down correctly, drive in the rain, respond to a cop in traffic, etc.

basically i can auto my job tasks that are not physical but it's VERY specific and does not capture situations where a variable or entire thing is off, it cant tell the difference between bricks and shit unless i write it so it straights up has variable doesnt match variable

low iq if you think automation will exist in administration or financial jobs, literally the whole thing is based on refusing to change regulations and set training and responsibilities

there are regulations and MASSIVE cultural bias against using macros/pattern REPETITION

my company's management pays huge amount of money for dumbass AI consultants PhDs and the management ends up "we're not paying you, this data is useless" then gets sued lul
 
basically i can auto my job tasks that are not physical but it's VERY specific and does not capture situations where a variable or entire thing is off, it cant tell the difference between bricks and shit unless i write it so it straights up has variable doesnt match variable

low iq if you think automation will exist in administration or financial jobs, literally the whole thing is based on refusing to change regulations and set training and responsibilities

there are regulations and MASSIVE cultural bias against using macros/pattern REPETITION

my company's management pays huge amount of money for dumbass AI consultants PhDs and the management ends up "we're not paying you, this data is useless" then gets sued lul

there are entire sectors that could have been automated already.
take a secretary for example, all she does is pass on messages from one person to another, and maybe do some accounting. a computer can easily do that already.
 
no ai can load a truck, strap the weight down correctly, drive in the rain, respond to a cop in traffic, etc.
Trucking, oil procurement, farms and aviation form the backbone of the global economy and none of them can be fully automated. Normies love the idea of self driving trucks but it's simply not possible and won't be for some time.
I know what you mean boyos, but you are most likely very wrong. Especially for trucking, think about it, if we alreade have a fully automated car auto pilot then how hard is it to adjust it for driving a truck. Not too hard. Give it 10 more years and most blue collars will be laid off. Check out the videos below

we need a truck driver and a construction worker much more than some IT faggot
That "IT faggot" is the one who will make the turcker and construction worker obsolete


 
I know what you mean boyos, but you are most likely very wrong. Especially for trucking, think about it, if we alreade have a fully automated car auto pilot then how hard is it to adjust it for driving a truck. Not too hard. Give it 10 more years and most blue collars will be laid off. Check out the videos below


That "IT faggot" is the one who will make the turcker and construction worker obsolete



A lot of this hype devised by marketing departments. Self driving vehicles in controlled environments like quarries are absolutely nothing new.
 
A lot of this hype devised by marketing departments. Self driving vehicles in controlled environments like quarries are absolutely nothing new.
The autopilot technology that is available right now is completely autonomous (Tesla and Audi autopilots) in a non controlled dynamic environment (live traffic). Now imagine in 10 years
 
The autopilot technology that is available right now is completely autonomous (Tesla and Audi autopilots) in a non controlled dynamic environment (live traffic). Now imagine in 10 years
Except it completely loses its mind when confronted by pedestrian areas or any sort of even slightly foul weather. On the highways it does OK, but it just cant predict things the way a person can.

Like I said the likely outcome is semi-autonomous driving that doesn't totally get rid of the driver.
 
Except it completely loses its mind when confronted by pedestrian areas or any sort of even slightly foul weather. On the highways it does OK, but it just cant predict things the way a person can.

Like I said the likely outcome is semi-autonomous driving that doesn't totally get rid of the driver.

yup. you can just look up self-driving videos from 2018 and see how shitty they are.

and yeah, in the end it's just gonna be upgraded cruise control.

the main skill with truckers is them loading, unloading, and navigating fucked up driving situations
 
Now imagine in 10 years
You need ai to make fully autopilot car. There is no understanding how to build even simplest ai. No, artificial neural networks are not ai.
 
Zod, you could be right. I dont think anyone knows for sure. Having worked in logistics I can tell you it just feels really far fetched to say it could all be automated the way many think it will be.
 
AI will fix it. The reason why hypergamy was loosened by tinder is that the development of automation will replace more and more manual jobs, making low status men redundant. In the future chads will be living their Greek life with their harem of Stacys and getting all the shit work done by robots.

We need population reduction and genetic engineering.
 
How would you define proper AI?
Proper ai can handle abstract thinking. If algorith cant do it - its always will be something out of program in real life and program cant handle it. Problem is where is no way to create abstract thinking algorythm with binary logic.

Whats why chess expert programs is not ai, not even close. Everything in chess is completely predictable, all rules determined so even if it beats up all best human chess players - its not ai at all.
 
Last edited:
No one society = collapsing soon
 
there are entire sectors that could have been automated already.
take a secretary for example, all she does is pass on messages from one person to another, and maybe do some accounting. a computer can easily do that already.

incorrect, social norms mean that verbal and immediate feedback is DEMANDED at the lower level

unless all scales of businesses cut out secretaries/receptionists which is basically a sales/FAQ position then low iq jobs will remain because all businesses start at that level. no one will read a FAQ or bother looking for the answers

i do accounting, i already automate my tasks but im forced by regulations to have it peer reviewed, approved by them and then by my supervisor then file it and update records

half of the time i cant automate my tasks because the software is forcibly following regulations and distribution permissions, which means making one change or retraction might result in me having to talk to someone else about the issue

companies pay for INSTITUTIONAL knowledge and the ability to transfer it to a customer or other co-workers when it comes to dead end "automatable jobs"

this is simply due to the customer's inability to go to a website, fill out a form, and wait patiently. also even if the company has the ability to automate things, you cant get rid of the fact that people want IMMEDIATE correspondence when money is on the line

low iq jobs that are automatable is just cashiers when old people die, but they're being replaced with kiosk supervisors lol

look at McDonalds/Little Cesars, they have kiosks and you can order online but half the time it doesnt show up when u scan your phone but if you ask for a manager, they can figure it out right away or resolve it on the spot
 
How would you define proper AI?


CRISPR genetic engineering could allow us to modify every trait that we want. Very promising technology

For this to happen you have to bump into every "ethic" and religion even to start with a little bit. Not to create an apocalyptic scenario would be the reduction and then the genetic engineering otherwise we will have hyper chads and even chads would be subhuman.
 
MUH AUTOMATION
there won't be any automation my dude. there is no AI.
the only AI that exists is the one that gives you amazon recommended products.
Cope, pull your head out of the sand. This is the future.
 
Proper ai can handle abstract thinking. If algorith cant do it - its always will be something out of program in real life and program cant handle it. Problem is where is no way to create abstract thinking algorythm with binary logic.

Whats why chess expert programs is not ai, not even close. Everything in chess is completely predictable, all rules determined so even if it beats up all best human chess players - its not ai at all.
Actually, given no memory constraints, *anything can be computed with a Touring complete system - sentience, abstract thinking, anything. Really, the only problem are memory and speed constraints. If you were to remove the cpus halt instruction, and prevent it from ever loop locking, then you could theoretically create AI just by letting the cpu continue unrestricted operation after jumping to a random memory address (considering that the memory is filled with random, mostly non NULL, values when you first turn it on). One of the most powerfull things a Touring complete system can do is run self modifying code
 
is impossible, full stop.

loading a truck, balancing the load, hitching it up, etc. is incredibly complex and takes experience.
Robots can land on the surface of a asteriod u think they can't load a vtruck
 
incorrect, social norms mean that verbal and immediate feedback is DEMANDED at the lower level

unless all scales of businesses cut out secretaries/receptionists which is basically a sales/FAQ position then low iq jobs will remain because all businesses start at that level. no one will read a FAQ or bother looking for the answers

i do accounting, i already automate my tasks but im forced by regulations to have it peer reviewed, approved by them and then by my supervisor then file it and update records

half of the time i cant automate my tasks because the software is forcibly following regulations and distribution permissions, which means making one change or retraction might result in me having to talk to someone else about the issue

companies pay for INSTITUTIONAL knowledge and the ability to transfer it to a customer or other co-workers when it comes to dead end "automatable jobs"

this is simply due to the customer's inability to go to a website, fill out a form, and wait patiently. also even if the company has the ability to automate things, you cant get rid of the fact that people want IMMEDIATE correspondence when money is on the line

low iq jobs that are automatable is just cashiers when old people die, but they're being replaced with kiosk supervisors lol

look at McDonalds/Little Cesars, they have kiosks and you can order online but half the time it doesnt show up when u scan your phone but if you ask for a manager, they can figure it out right away or resolve it on the spot

exactly. even if you automate the job, the customers still want a human at the desk.
i mean shit, we still have coffee shops and bars. and its something we could automate 50 years ago. but people *need* that small interaction instead of pushing a button.
Cope, pull your head out of the sand. This is the future.

this is what you guys don't understand about automation.
an AI only works in predictable environment. similar to windows startup repair if you ever used it.
an AI is simply just a collection of patterns/algorithm. we are not even CLOSE to have something like the terminator or evil robots.
and also, its much cheaper to hire someone for minimum wage to lay bricks then to buy a giant robots to do it instead.
 
Last edited:
humans and this planet have expiration date:feelsokman:
 
Robots can land on the surface of a asteriod u think they can't load a vtruck

there are thousands of people that engineer,maintain and track that robot. you are talking about a robot that does everything with no human supervision.
 
lets face it, wageslaves and blue collar are much more important than white collar in terms of productivity. but not in terms of wage.
we need a truck driver and a construction worker much more than some IT faggot that makes 200k a year.

if low-status men die off. then who will 'run' the world?
this is the ultimate debate here. winners always win, but for winners to exist you need losers as well. which completely debunks the whole 'competition is good for everything' meme.
competition is good when you have 2 chimps that fight eachother to control the terrority. but human society is more complex than a bunch of fucking chimps.
this is not sexual socialism. call it whatever you like, but you can't prove me wrong.

Curries and ricecels
there are thousands of people that engineer,maintain and track that robot. you are talking about a robot that does everything with no human supervision.
Curries and ricecels
 
This is why societies where women are a choice inevitably crash and burn. Women are attracted to the top men who don't keep society running and live off its fruits. Meanwhile the men at the bottom are shunned or get the bottom droppings that nobody wants. Women would rather share one man than have to settle and men stop doing vital jobs to maintain society if they have no stake in it.
 
there are thousands of people that engineer,maintain and track that robot. you are talking about a robot that does everything with no human supervision.
Not a robot many robots a complete automated system
 
exactly. even if you automate the job, the customers still want a human at the desk.
i mean shit, we still have coffee shops and bars. and its something we could automate 50 years ago. but people *need* that small interaction instead of pushing a button.


this is what you guys don't understand about automation.
an AI only works in predictable environment. similar to windows startup repair if you ever used it.
an AI is simply just a collection of patterns/algorithm. we are not even CLOSE to have something like the terminator or evil robots.
and also, its much cheaper to hire someone for minimum wage to lay bricks then to buy a giant robots to do it instead.

Also the opportunity cost of having a female worker means they can generate more than enough revenue with orbitors
 
MUH AUTOMATION
there won't be any automation my dude. there is no AI.
the only AI that exists is the one that gives you amazon recommended products.
this is what you guys don't understand about automation.
an AI only works in predictable environment. similar to windows startup repair if you ever used it.
an AI is simply just a collection of patterns/algorithm. we are not even CLOSE to have something like the terminator or evil robots.
and also, its much cheaper to hire someone for minimum wage to lay bricks then to buy a giant robots to do it instead.
Brilliant, could not say it better myself.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top