Blackpill ''If only my parents didn't breed'' is 100% cope

[Copingtillidie]

Do you guys know how evolution works?
I mean,back in the days WE WERE FUCKING MONKEYS.

If all ugly people died,todays normies would become the new ugly
It's inevitable that 70-80% of men are gonna be considered unattractive

 

[happiless]

I can say this justifiably because I'm racemixed, but yeah you have a point. Foids will always seek the top % of men, so the problem lies with society for not restricting their freedoms

 

[Summer202]

Do you guys know how evolution works?
I mean,back in the days WE WERE FUCKING MONKEYS.

If all ugly people died,todays normies would become the new ugly
It's inevitable that 70-80% of men are gonna be considered unattractive

This is not true.

Some species of animals mate indiscriminently (like certain species of apes).

If we all turned into Chad we would all be attractive to women. Even if some Chads were slighly better than others.

 

[GeneticDysfunction]

Low iq post they should never had breed to create another subhuman male to eventually rope from loneliness

 

[Copingtillidie]

Low iq post they should never had breed to create another subhuman male to eventually rope from loneliness

You know how short and ugly the average person was 1000 years ago?
Hypergamy exists to evolve as a species

 

[morgenthau]

If only my parents didn't breed

I am thinking about it all the time.
The world would be a better place without me every existing.

 

[randomguy1235]

Do you guys know how evolution works?
I mean,back in the days WE WERE FUCKING MONKEYS.

If all ugly people died,todays normies would become the new ugly
It's inevitable that 70-80% of men are gonna be considered unattractive

This is simply false, relativist nonsense. Humans have an objective criteria for measuring fitness, health, and beauty. We don't look at a straight, functional human leg and say "Hmm, this leg is broken." This means that there's always going to be a certain threshold for looks that, once met, will mean you're considered objectively attractive.

 

[fred_herbert]

This is simply false, relativist nonsense. Humans have an objective criteria for measuring fitness, health, and beauty. We don't look at a straight, functional human leg and say "Hmm, this leg is broken." This means that there's always going to be a certain threshold for looks that, once met, will mean you're considered objectively attractive.

Exactly. OP's reasoning is flawed. You are either attractive or not. How attractive the rest of the population is, will not make you any less attractive. Think for one second. If 99.99% of girls was > 9/10 and you found a 7/10 girl, would you not fuck her just because she's the least attractive? Ofc you would, she is still 7/10 regardless of the fact that the rest is 9/10.

 

[randomguy1235]

Exactly. OP's reasoning is flawed. You are either attractive or not. How attractive the rest of the population is, will not make you any less attractive. Think for one second. If 99.99% of girls was > 9/10 and you found a 7/10 girl, would you not fuck her just because she's the least attractive? Ofc you would, she is still 7/10 regardless of the fact that the rest is 9/10.

Yep, exactly. Chad is Chad, regardless if everyone is Chad-tier physically.

 

[maynarde]

Do you guys know how evolution works?
I mean,back in the days WE WERE FUCKING MONKEYS.

If all ugly people died,todays normies would become the new ugly
It's inevitable that 70-80% of men are gonna be considered unattractive

When 95 Oct of people lived on farms avg looking was fine

 

[Weed]

This is simply false, relativist nonsense. Humans have an objective criteria for measuring fitness, health, and beauty. We don't look at a straight, functional human leg and say "Hmm, this leg is broken." This means that there's always going to be a certain threshold for looks that, once met, will mean you're considered objectively attractive.

Exactly. OP's reasoning is flawed. You are either attractive or not. How attractive the rest of the population is, will not make you any less attractive. Think for one second. If 99.99% of girls was > 9/10 and you found a 7/10 girl, would you not fuck her just because she's the least attractive? Ofc you would, she is still 7/10 regardless of the fact that the rest is 9/10.

Facepalm. There is always a bad gene and a good gene, it's the law of the nature. There always going to be the great contrast.

 

[fred_herbert]

Facepalm. There is always a bad gene and a good gene, it's the law of the nature. There always going to be the great contrast.

Bad genes look unattractive dumbass. If everyone was GL, it means everyone has good genes. Only ugly people have bad genes. Look at animals. Are there cat incels? Or lion incels? No, because they all have good genes. There's no 80 - 20 rule in their world, because there are no subhumans (sublions).

 

[Hail The Bloatlord]

High IQ

 

[Weed]

Bad genes look unattractive dumbass. If everyone was GL, it means everyone has good genes. Only ugly people have bad genes. Look at animals. Are there cat incels? Or lion incels? No, because they all have good genes. There's no 80 - 20 rule in their world, because there are no subhumans (sublions).

There are incels in some animal species, depends on who chooses partner, female or male in that specie.
7/10 would be the new 2/10 if that was the new treshold. If we had, opposite of op's post, only sub3s would exist, 3s would be the new supermodels.

 

[Tallcel]

I'm quite sure that if most of us looked like Dolph Lundgren or Idris Elba, while a couple looked like Denzel Washington or Tom Cruise, we'd all be getting laid. There is quite a bit of range in what can be considered attractive, even among femoids.

People want variety. Very few men want to fap to the same woman over and over again. Usually they have a collection of women with various attractive qualities that meet their criteria in their porn folders and tape stacks. This is the same for women to a lesser extent.