Then why do AAA companies release so many remasters and remakes?
Gaming If modern games aren't getting shittier and boomers just love to complain
Totally agree, gaming is getting better if anything
That's just a low effort source of a guaranteed income.
>muhh games are getting worse
How many shitty game were existed back in 80/90s/00? And how few there were a good ones?
And yes, there are a lot of good games nowadays.
I remember there was going to be a final fantasy 7 remake and a lot of boomers complained about it. They even don't want the earlier final fantasy remakes, such fucking cucks.
Having to ruin it for everybody.
Modern gaming is shit. The golden ages were the 90s. Late 90s in particular tbh.
Роашник, сударь, а ви случаем не русский?
This.
The new only intelligent and fact based post in the thread other than OP’s.
What's a milk-drinker like you doing out here anyway? Go home to your mother.
there is a lack of good writers and plots. its over.
Ever since IPs started getting big and copyrighted, creativity became homogenized under big names and games are simply recycled yearly now. Might as well make a remaster nothing else is big except predatory gacha games with 0 creative ideas.
Our world is so complex! You can find numerous excuses for everything
And there is a megacorp, with hundreds, if not thousands of bright minds - they wont do anything that will endanger their money-getting schemes
If they cant develop something new, that will make money - why not remake old blockbuster? What gets them money - that gets into development
and of course this is just one random excuse for that, and there isnt only one excuse for literally anything
No problem can be solved in one way - and when it does involve something with hundreds of people.. they got endless opportunities of problem solving
and corps just want money
And there is a megacorp, with hundreds, if not thousands of bright minds - they wont do anything that will endanger their money-getting schemes
If they cant develop something new, that will make money - why not remake old blockbuster? What gets them money - that gets into development
and of course this is just one random excuse for that, and there isnt only one excuse for literally anything
No problem can be solved in one way - and when it does involve something with hundreds of people.. they got endless opportunities of problem solving
and corps just want money
Таки да
Охуеть, крутяк
правда, для пендосов русская освободительная армия не так пишется, ну да ладно
Они не поймут так или иначе
Jews have destroyed gaming
start being pocket with money and never preorder and rember to set a timer for 1 hour and 55 min the decide to keep or refund
nintendo is an emulator company at this point
B
Companies don’t want to create anything new, they want safe options that will guarantee money.
And also, why are so many modern games released as unpolished, unstable, unfinished, buggy messes of spaghetti code? 
I have played over 1000+ games in my lifetime, so I will state my input here. Compare games from back in the mid-2000s to now. We had Far Cry 2 with burning and destructible foliage. GTA San Andreas with a large open world and dynamic car destruction. SWAT 4 with top of the notch controllable AI. Half-Life 2 with absolutely groundbreaking physics. Soldier of Fortune with dynamic limb dismemberment. Red Faction with completely destructible environments, with absolutely no limits. Not to mention the multitudes of games in the past with miscellaneous interactables that would immerse the player more deeply into the game. Crysis with its batshit insane graphics, that pretty much NO computers in 2007 were able to run on high settings.
How many modern games can you list that have any sort of combination of these?
It has been 20+ years since some of these came out, and we have somehow DOWNGRADED for the most part from how it used to be, LMAO.
For some of the case, a lot of these companies make their profits simply by brand name. For example, when people think of Just Cause, a lot of people think of Just Cause 2, which was fun as fuck, not Just Cause 4, which is somewhat mid. These companies can afford to make new shitty downgrades every year because of this.
The influx of "retro style" shooters isn't helping, because even though a lot of them are cool and creative, in some aspects, they miss the point of what made those old games so good. A lot of indie games these days are shitting out pretty solid titles, though.
With "AAA" gaming companies, it's just a dick measuring contest on who could make their game look the prettiest and who can make their games the most pozzed. We have good looking and decent playing racing games with "birdshit" destruction. We have good looking games that last 5 hours and have little to no playability, with companies now charging $70 for them. It's all about LOOKS for these fuckers, from both the consumer and the company themselves.
There are very few AAA companies that are still even on par with how they were decades ago. Some try to make up for a lack of interactivity and replayability by doing dumb shit like spreading "collectibles" around the map, but people who have played video games for a long time can see right through this bullshit.
Red Dead Redemption 2 is probably the newest AAA game that masterfully adds even just a few of the top notch stuff that was present in the games I listed above 20 years ago, and infuses it into the game to some degree, which makes it such a good fucking game. A RDR2 type scenario nowadays where just some absolutely amazing game comes out that blows them all out of the water is maybe once every eight or so years. Back over a decade ago, there would be a game like this that would come out every year. 1998, 2004, and 2007 in terms of video gaming had several of these types of games competing amongst one another. The golden era.
So yeah, at this point I definitely do prefer a remaster of a 20 year old game over some washed out garbage. Pretty much most video games with a few exceptions stopped being good after 2014. I cannot wait until the gaming industry crashes and burns to the ground again so they are FORCED to come out with good shit.
How many modern games can you list that have any sort of combination of these?
It has been 20+ years since some of these came out, and we have somehow DOWNGRADED for the most part from how it used to be, LMAO.
For some of the case, a lot of these companies make their profits simply by brand name. For example, when people think of Just Cause, a lot of people think of Just Cause 2, which was fun as fuck, not Just Cause 4, which is somewhat mid. These companies can afford to make new shitty downgrades every year because of this.
The influx of "retro style" shooters isn't helping, because even though a lot of them are cool and creative, in some aspects, they miss the point of what made those old games so good. A lot of indie games these days are shitting out pretty solid titles, though.
With "AAA" gaming companies, it's just a dick measuring contest on who could make their game look the prettiest and who can make their games the most pozzed. We have good looking and decent playing racing games with "birdshit" destruction. We have good looking games that last 5 hours and have little to no playability, with companies now charging $70 for them. It's all about LOOKS for these fuckers, from both the consumer and the company themselves.
There are very few AAA companies that are still even on par with how they were decades ago. Some try to make up for a lack of interactivity and replayability by doing dumb shit like spreading "collectibles" around the map, but people who have played video games for a long time can see right through this bullshit.
Red Dead Redemption 2 is probably the newest AAA game that masterfully adds even just a few of the top notch stuff that was present in the games I listed above 20 years ago, and infuses it into the game to some degree, which makes it such a good fucking game. A RDR2 type scenario nowadays where just some absolutely amazing game comes out that blows them all out of the water is maybe once every eight or so years. Back over a decade ago, there would be a game like this that would come out every year. 1998, 2004, and 2007 in terms of video gaming had several of these types of games competing amongst one another. The golden era.
So yeah, at this point I definitely do prefer a remaster of a 20 year old game over some washed out garbage. Pretty much most video games with a few exceptions stopped being good after 2014. I cannot wait until the gaming industry crashes and burns to the ground again so they are FORCED to come out with good shit.
Last edited:
while it's true that game corps don't experiment much anymore. There are still lots of good games if you play the Jap ones and filter heavily
Modern games are absolutely complete shit compared to the games made back in the day. Early to mid 2000s were the prime years.
We got 16-22 year old kids who have absolutely no idea how good things were back in the early days of gaming and think that the games made right now are great. Graphics weren't as good but it wasn't about that. It was about the story, the writing, the novelty, and the overall content.
We got 16-22 year old kids who have absolutely no idea how good things were back in the early days of gaming and think that the games made right now are great. Graphics weren't as good but it wasn't about that. It was about the story, the writing, the novelty, and the overall content.
Last edited:
Similar threads
starystulejarz
Users who are viewing this thread
