Drakul
Banned
-
- Joined
- May 28, 2023
- Posts
- 2,221
The fact that height is more obvious to measure than ideal facial proportions that trigger attraction in foids doesn't mean anything. It's still the realm of physical objects (bones) that disposed in a certain set give a certain configuration of reality.
To understand better this mechanism think about how obsolete has become the method of judging a person bodyfat through kilogrammes alone. That's why BMI was discovered and now we use that to assess if a person is overweight or not. Yet you can't measure BMI with normal means or mechanical tools : THIS DOESN'T MEAN IT ISN'T THE REAL METHOD LET ALONE NOT EXISTING AT ALL.
People who mock PSL autists are the same cavemen that mocked the metric system when people used measuring things with their cocks and assholes.
It's not that women care about "philtrum" or canthal tilt in a conscious way but it can be analyzed if some characters are ALWAYS preferred to others or not. Hence hunter eyes are objectively better cause all things equal everyone will prefer them to NCT bug eyes with tons of eyelid exposure as everyone will see that 6 foot is taller than 5 foot.
If you believe in types you may as well believe that depending on tastes the same man can be a towering 6'7" viking or a 4'9" jumping Indian janitor. Yes if beauty is subjective also race is.
To understand better this mechanism think about how obsolete has become the method of judging a person bodyfat through kilogrammes alone. That's why BMI was discovered and now we use that to assess if a person is overweight or not. Yet you can't measure BMI with normal means or mechanical tools : THIS DOESN'T MEAN IT ISN'T THE REAL METHOD LET ALONE NOT EXISTING AT ALL.
People who mock PSL autists are the same cavemen that mocked the metric system when people used measuring things with their cocks and assholes.
It's not that women care about "philtrum" or canthal tilt in a conscious way but it can be analyzed if some characters are ALWAYS preferred to others or not. Hence hunter eyes are objectively better cause all things equal everyone will prefer them to NCT bug eyes with tons of eyelid exposure as everyone will see that 6 foot is taller than 5 foot.
If you believe in types you may as well believe that depending on tastes the same man can be a towering 6'7" viking or a 4'9" jumping Indian janitor. Yes if beauty is subjective also race is.