_wifebeater_
Mentally crippled by lonely teen years
★
- Joined
- May 13, 2018
- Posts
- 3,515
Inceldom is what made us mental in the first place, therefore only a prime virgin gf could fix us.
Anyone seen that survey that means to challenge the idea that incels need therapy?
There's a lot wrong with society. But there's a lot wrong with us too. There's a lot wrong with people like Alek Minassian, who will kill because of whatever demons there are in him. I don't think most of us would hurt people over our inceldom, but there's plenty wrong with our brains even if we don't hurt people.
Could you elaborate on this? Do you believe the bluepill is correct about certain things?In many things, we are flat out wrong.
So what's to be done about that, if not therapy? An incel who isn't a danger to people doesn't need to be monitored. But he should address the ills in his mind somehow. He should, if nothing else, be able to admit he's fucked up in the head. I can admit this about myself. I can admit that I am not mentally healthy. I don't think I want to be. But I can admit I'm wrong.
You sound very masochistic OP. Are you larp of the same coin (different side) of the same Edge lording?
Could you elaborate on this? Do you believe the bluepill is correct about certain things?
26% of Americans ages 18 and older suffers from a diagnosable mental disorder. Women are more likely to be mentally ill than men. Why specifically do you suggest that incels should engage in psychological self-flagellation by acknowledging being "fucked in the head" when mentally ill women would never be expected to do the same thing? There are plenty of women that are significantly more mentally ill than the average incel, yet they all look down on us as inferiors. Many incels would be able to have a positive influence on such women's lives if they were open to dating them.
It's wrong to kill because of your inceldom, and it's wrong to make excuses for killers.
I can accept that Minassian was compelled by his mental illness to kill in the name of whatever he believed. And I can agree that the world is pretty rotten.
But the world does not deserve Minassian's wrath.
If you kill, and your motive was "Argh the damned femorloids," that's mental illness. Something's wrong with the way you think.
High IQ.It is wrong to kill or advocate violence in the name of inceldom only because doing so is illegal. Making excuses for killers isn't wrong. Most people recognize that it was necessary to kill and maim tens of thousands of women and children in Hiroshima and Nagasaki to avert the greater evil of prolonging World War II. The pilots who dropped the atomic bombs are killers in the literal sense of the word, but no one views them as such. Everyone understands that they had a "good excuse".
Now, obviously, these killings are justifiable because they were legally sanctioned and the perpetrators did not violate any social norms. There have been, and still are some, societies where lethal violence against women who engage in fornication or adultery is legally sanctioned. So at least in some contexts, violence against the types of women that Elliot Rodger loathed is legal and justifiable.
Sex is a basic human need, and men who are deprived of it their entire lives or for prolonged periods often become angry and prone to experience violent thoughts and fantasies. This is perfectly normal, and it's been well-known throughout history that sexually frustrated men are a potential threat to society.
It is well documented that incels are much more likely to experience violent thoughts than sexually active men. The majority of the cohort of "love-shy" incels studied by Bryan Gilmartin reported experiencing violent thoughts, compared to only 12% of sexually active controls.
I asked each repondent: "Have you had fantasies during the past month in which you saw yourself as being very violent with some person or group?" Quite in spite of the fact that the love-shys were much more pacifistic and anti-war in their ideological belief systems than were the non-shys, it is most intriguing to note that fully 71 percent of the older love-shys and 66 percent of the younger ones answered "yes" to this question! And it becomes all the more intriguing when it is observed that only 12 percent of the self-confident non-shy men similarly answered "yes" (Gilmartin, 1985)
The vast majority of incels who experience violents thoughts will never act on them because of moral compunctions, fear, empathy, and the availability of porn. But there will always be a tiny few that do.
Elliot Rodger believed that women should not have the right to choose their own sex partners and viewed most women as depraved sluts who deserved to suffer and die. Can his murders be explained by his mental illness? Yes and no. His autism was a necessary cause, but not a sufficient one. Without his ideological conviction, born of personal experience, that most women are bad, he would not have done what he did.
Up until 1630, the majority of women convicted of witchcraft were prostitutes. The men who wanted them to burn for their depravity undeniably had similar views of women as ER and AM, and most of them certainly weren't mentally ill. The average modern woman is likely as depraved as the average 16th century witch.
That's your opinion, which is just as valid as anyone else's, but it's not a fact. I've seen some religious people argue that mankind deserves COVID-19 as punishment for its sins. I don't agree with their religious interpretation, but I certainly don't feel sorry for women who have lost their lives as a result of the virus. "Minassian's wrath" pales in comparison to the death toll of the coronavirus, but I can't say I feel sorry for most of his female victims either.
Not all incel killers were mentally ill. George Sodini had a high paying job and no one who knew him considered him to be mentally ill. Marc Lepine was never diagnosed with a mental illness. The desire to take revenge on society and/or women is not necessarily pathological.
Not all serial killers who are motivated by hatred of women are mentally ill either. Psychopathy and other dark-triad personality traits that tend to increase a man's likelihood of passing on his genes should not be considered mental illnesses. They are unpleasant features of human evolution and not bugs.
Tbh you can't really compare most incels to alek or any other anomaly. There's tons of incels that aren't exactly mentally unhealthy. However tbh in general most People, even non-incels I guess would qualify as mentally unhealthy in this case. Lots of "normal" people absolutely love to hear of the deaths of people like us. Extermination of the ugly and unwanted, they love it. And then have an open chance to just collect their virtue points while they're at it by acting like they give a shit.
It is wrong to kill or advocate violence in the name of inceldom only because doing so is illegal. Making excuses for killers isn't wrong. Most people recognize that it was necessary to kill and maim tens of thousands of women and children in Hiroshima and Nagasaki to avert the greater evil of prolonging World War II. The pilots who dropped the atomic bombs are killers in the literal sense of the word, but no one views them as such. Everyone understands that they had a "good excuse".
Now, obviously, these killings are justifiable because they were legally sanctioned and the perpetrators did not violate any social norms. There have been, and still are some, societies where lethal violence against women who engage in fornication or adultery is legally sanctioned. So at least in some contexts, violence against the types of women that Elliot Rodger loathed is legal and justifiable.
Sex is a basic human need, and men who are deprived of it their entire lives or for prolonged periods often become angry and prone to experience violent thoughts and fantasies. This is perfectly normal, and it's been well-known throughout history that sexually frustrated men are a potential threat to society.
It is well documented that incels are much more likely to experience violent thoughts than sexually active men. The majority of the cohort of "love-shy" incels studied by Bryan Gilmartin reported experiencing violent thoughts, compared to only 12% of sexually active controls.
I asked each repondent: "Have you had fantasies during the past month in which you saw yourself as being very violent with some person or group?" Quite in spite of the fact that the love-shys were much more pacifistic and anti-war in their ideological belief systems than were the non-shys, it is most intriguing to note that fully 71 percent of the older love-shys and 66 percent of the younger ones answered "yes" to this question! And it becomes all the more intriguing when it is observed that only 12 percent of the self-confident non-shy men similarly answered "yes" (Gilmartin, 1985)
The vast majority of incels who experience violents thoughts will never act on them because of moral compunctions, fear, empathy, and the availability of porn. But there will always be a tiny few that do.
Elliot Rodger believed that women should not have the right to choose their own sex partners and viewed most women as depraved sluts who deserved to suffer and die. Can his murders be explained by his mental illness? Yes and no. His autism was a necessary cause, but not a sufficient one. Without his ideological conviction, born of personal experience, that most women are bad, he would not have done what he did.
Up until 1630, the majority of women convicted of witchcraft were prostitutes. The men who wanted them to burn for their depravity undeniably had similar views of women as ER and AM, and most of them certainly weren't mentally ill. The average modern woman is likely as depraved as the average 16th century witch.
That's your opinion, which is just as valid as anyone else's, but it's not a fact. I've seen some religious people argue that mankind deserves COVID-19 as punishment for its sins. I don't agree with their religious interpretation, but I certainly don't feel sorry for women who have lost their lives as a result of the virus. "Minassian's wrath" pales in comparison to the death toll of the coronavirus, but I can't say I feel sorry for most of his female victims either.
Not all incel killers were mentally ill. George Sodini had a high paying job and no one who knew him considered him to be mentally ill. Marc Lepine was never diagnosed with a mental illness. The desire to take revenge on society and/or women is not necessarily pathological.
Not all serial killers who are motivated by hatred of women are mentally ill either. Psychopathy and other dark-triad personality traits that tend to increase a man's likelihood of passing on his genes should not be considered mental illnesses. They are unpleasant features of human evolution and not bugs.
Bro your posts are always so fucking bland and apologetic like you're trying to be some diplomat for the normies.
Basically on the polar opposite end of the spectrum from the edgelords posting nothing but IT bait for shock value, who are just as cringey.
@FrothySolutions thoughts?
Or to drug you up and then handwave your problems away, either way therapy is a scam.They have no solution at all. They're just here to hear me complain and say see you next week
Eh I wouldn't say most tbh. I mean everyone has mental illnesses nowadays because it's cool and trendy. But ignoring that most that I see are ignorant to their situation. Still pretty calm people even if they do suffer tbh.
Are you in therapy yourself?They're calm, but it's just, it's hard for me to pick out an incel on here that doesn't need some kind of help. And by "help" I don't mean "affection." I mean something's wrong with them.
ShivamaxxingAnyone seen that survey that means to challenge the idea that incels need therapy?
There's a lot wrong with society. But there's a lot wrong with us too. There's a lot wrong with people like Alek Minassian, who will kill because of whatever demons there are in him. I don't think most of us would hurt people over our inceldom, but there's plenty wrong with our brains even if we don't hurt people. In many things, we are flat out wrong.
So what's to be done about that, if not therapy? An incel who isn't a danger to people doesn't need to be monitored. But he should address the ills in his mind somehow. He should, if nothing else, be able to admit he's fucked up in the head. I can admit this about myself. I can admit that I am not mentally healthy. I don't think I want to be. But I can admit I'm wrong.
Are you in therapy yourself?
So you're cured now?No, I used to be though.
So you're cured now?
“what will fix us” uhhh, I don’t know, Intimacy and affection? Have you read the title of this website, What kind of retard are you?
Then go back to therapy you hypocrite, you.No, the objective of my therapy was to help me achieve my goals. We never got to discuss what was wrong with me, probably because the things that are wrong with me today weren't manifested at the time. I'm fucked up now, but probably I wasn't as fucked up back then.
That mob has helped to build that house. We all have obligations forced on us. All countries have taxes, many have military services for men. The "system" you are referring to that "punishes the mob" is compromised of the collective power of all men, many of which are incels.Third, you can't blame society for the ills of disturbed men. It's not society's responsibility to make disturbed men happy. It's a disturbed man's responsibility to not commit atrocities. That's like saying "If you don't want your house burned down, make sure to pay protection money to the mob." It's the mob that's wrong. Not the people who won't kneel to them. So we engineer a system that punishes the mob.
I somewhat disagree with this notion not in the "government mandated GF" way, but many people seem to recognize bullying as a large factor in these retribution attacks. Some even say on Twitter "should have been bullied harder" or something. When you recognize something as a cause and are unwilling to do or exert anything to curb that you aren't be constructive. I don't think you really have a right to complain about anything.Third, you can't blame society for the ills of disturbed men. It's not society's responsibility to make disturbed men happy. It's a disturbed man's responsibility to not commit atrocities. That's like saying "If you don't want your house burned down, make sure to pay protection money to the mob." It's the mob that's wrong. Not the people who won't kneel to them. So we engineer a system that punishes the mob.
Then go back to therapy you hypocrite, you.
I somewhat disagree with this notion "government mandated GF" way, but many people seem to recognize bullying as a large factor in these retribution attacks. Some even say on Twitter "should have been bullied harder" or something. When you recognize something as a cause and are unwilling to do or exert anything to curb that you aren't be constructive. I don't think you really have a right to complain about anything.
Bullies are the most financially, socially, and romantically successful people in society. They have the highest confidence and self-esteem. They constantly win in life. Yet they built many of thing by tearing down and destroying others. They commit crimes against people yet society protects them because of their genetics and the fact they're concerned about their "future" while they simultaneously force people to drop out of high-school and completely ruin their futures.
I do not believe that society has zero responsibility in such situations.