If Hitler suceeded feminism wouldn't be a thing

[Deleted member 306]

Allow me to elaborate. Hitler's vision was to apply eugenics in order to create a world of Chad's and Stacies. Everyone would be beautful and everyone would be happy kinda like Normies are. Incels wouldn't exist because every person would be granted good looks. Feminism wouldn't be a thing because women would be free to choose between Chads since subhumans wouldn't exist. No need for patriarchy since all men would get their fair share so concepts like arranged marriage wouldn't be necessary.

Hitler being stopped was a devastating blow for humanity. Subhumans bred creating more subhumans. Many incels were born and feminism was crafted as a means to sexually liberate women and allow them to freely pursue sex with whoever they want. On the other side, are conservative patriarchy supporters who need to control females in order to assure sexual success. The two sides have been fighting for 50 years and forums like ours were created as side effects of this battle. 80% of men are repulsive to the average girl and seen as a potential threat. If eugenics were applied some level of gender equality would have been achieved and both men adnwomen would have a good amount of dating options.

 

[nausea]

no

femonics would have found a way to create incels anyway

 

[jagged0]

laughed for a good 30 seconds at this cope post, what would hitler's europe do for a uscel like me?

 

[Reddit_is_for_cucks]

Honestly, birtish people should have took over Asia as well. It would have probably been better of the country

 

[Deleted member 306]

no

femonics would have found a way to create incels anyway

Females don't create incels. Nature does.

---

laughed for a good 30 seconds at this cope post, what would hitler's europe do for a uscel like me?

Hitler would have taken over US eventually.

---

laughed for a good 30 seconds at this cope post, what would hitler's europe do for a uscel like me?

Hitler would have taken over US eventually.

 

[nausea]

incelman I love you but you are coping

 

[jagged0]

Females don't create incels. Nature does.

---

Hitler would have taken over US eventually.

---

Hitler would have taken over US eventually.

---

---

lmao, all of europe combined couldn't defeat the US.

 

[Deleted member 60]

we wouldn't be a thing either.

 

[Deleted member 306]

lmao, all of europe combined couldn't defeat the US.

It's not about quanity but about quality.

 

[DankIncel]

What a cope.

We would have been considered subhumans and would still have to suffer.

The Nazi really cared about superiority and creating the true Aryan. They really cared about genes. We are genetic garbage. How would that go?

 

[Deleted member 306]

we wouldn't be a thing either.

YES. Subhuman trash ike us wouldn't exist. Everyone Chad.

---

What a cope.

We would have been considered subhumans and would still have to suffer.

The Nazi really cared about superiority and creating the true Aryan. They really cared about genes. We are genetic garbage. How would that go?

That's my point. Genetic trahs wouln't be brought to lofe. The Spartans did the same thing by throwing problematic babies into a pit.

 

[Deleted member 306]

Hitler was really ahead of his time. Instead of defying nature, he intended to improve humanity in order to keep up with the cruelty and unfairness of its animalistic nature.

 

[Deleted member 306]

Hitler was really ahead of his time. Instead of defying nature, he intended to improve humanity in order to keep up with the cruelty and unfairness of its animalistic nature.

Eugenics would have produced a fair dating market.

 

[Red Shambhala]

Status is relational, not absolute, so eugenics wouldn't have changed anything about hypergamy. Women only want the top, and top is a relational category (better than x) not an absolute category. Normie's would gave been the Incels then, chadlites the Normie's.

 

[nausea]

Status is relational, not absolute, so eugenics wouldn't have changed anything about hypergamy. Women only want the top, and top is a relational category (better than x) not an absolute category. Normie's would gave been the Incels then, chadlites the Normie's.

you good speaker

 

[blickpall]

Females don't create incels. Nature does.

The floor level of the sexual market is both genetics and female standards. In a post-modern post-eugenics society where all men are by current standards 8/10 - 9.9/10, the sexual floor becomes 8/10. Here's how it would play out:

Current - Future
8/10 - 0/10
8.2/10 - 1/10
8.4/10 - 2/10
8.6/10 - 3/10
8.8/10 - 4/10 <- Anything below is practically guaranteed incel
9/10 - 5/10
9.2/10 - 6/10
9.4/10 - 7/10
9.6/10 - 8/10 <- Post-modern Chadism begins here
9.8/10 - 9/10
9.99../10 - 10/10 <-Post-modern GigaChad

Status is relational, not absolute, so eugenics wouldn't have changed anything about hypergamy. Women only want the top, and top is a relational category (better than x) not an absolute category. Normie's would gave been the Incels then, chadlites the Normie's.

^ Damn, you wrote this as I was typing out my scale. Pretty much this.

lmao, all of europe combined couldn't defeat the US.

Super blind patriotism cope.

 

[Deleted member 306]

I disagree. Looks become subjective after 8/10.

 

[blickpall]

I disagree. Looks become subjective after 8/10.

That's only because they are at the top echelon of the current genetic landscape. The rating scale is itself subjective but is constrained by said objective landscape. In a world where everyone is 8-10 on the current scale, the 8's by definition have to become the 1's on the new scale because the genetic landscape has changed.

It's like if you're the most attractive person in your small town high school, but then you go to a metropolitan public college and join the swim team or something. Suddenly, the most attractive person from Nowheresville, Kansas becomes the least attractive person in his new surroundings. In the context of the swim team, he is a 1/10.

 

[Deleted member 306]

That's only because they are at the top echelon of the current genetic landscape. The rating scale is itself subjective but is constrained by said objective landscape. In a world where everyone is 8-10 on the current scale, the 8's by definition have to become the 1's on the new scale because the genetic landscape has changed.

It's like if you're the most attractive person in your small town high school, but then you go to a metropolitan public college and join the swim team or something. Suddenly, the most attractive person from Nowheresville, Kansas becomes the least attractive person in his new surroundings. In the context of the swim team, he is a 1/10.

After 8/10 it's about preferences. There is no objective 10/10 or 9/10.

 

[blickpall]

After 8/10 it's about preferences. There is no objective 10/10 or 9/10.

I must not be explaining myself clearly.

Once the 8/10s are the bottom of the barrel, females will "prefer" the top of the new scale. They will prefer the "new" 8/10s, which will be objectively more attractive than the former 8/10s because beauty standards will shift in respect to the demographics. Reality is subjective, and if your reality is that the ugliest men are 8/10, then they become the new incels.

Let me give you another hypothetical example. We round up all incels and make a leper colony of sorts. Top rating 4/10, nothing lower. Then we throw in all the women that are looksmatches for these incels. It won't take long for the 4/10s to become the new slayers of this colony despite being ugly. The only distinguishing traits between one 4/10 and another is what defects they have, and that's where preference comes in. Giraffecel will be preferable to Chincel to some women, while others will like the opposite. That is the same effect that will happen in a eugenic society. People who are less perfect (i.e. the 8/10s) will be more unanimously considered subpar, the ones that are closer to 10/10 will be where the preferences differentiate between them.

 

[Deleted member 306]

I must not be explaining myself clearly.

Once the 8/10s are the bottom of the barrel, females will "prefer" the top of the new scale. They will prefer the "new" 8/10s, which will be objectively more attractive than the former 8/10s because beauty standards will shift in respect to the demographics. Reality is subjective, and if your reality is that the ugliest men are 8/10, then they become the new incels.

Let me give you another hypothetical example. We round up all incels and make a leper colony of sorts. Top rating 4/10, nothing lower. Then we throw in all the women that are looksmatches for these incels. It won't take long for the 4/10s to become the new slayers of this colony despite being ugly. The only distinguishing traits between one 4/10 and another is what defects they have, and that's where preference comes in. Giraffecel will be preferable to Chincel to some women, while others will like the opposite. That is the same effect that will happen in a eugenic society. People who are less perfect (i.e. the 8/10s) will be more unanimously considered subpar, the ones that are closer to 10/10 will be where the preferences differentiate between them.

The male beauty standards are very specific. Tall, strong jaw, compact midface, thick neck, big frame, head full of hair, shaped eybrows, PCT. If these stadnards are met then the rest is up to preference. Some girls like upper eylied exposure while some others like hunter eyes. Some girls like musles , some don't. Some girls like straight eybrows, some like tilted ones.

 

[ironcrusher38]

The male beauty standards are very specific. Tall, strong jaw, compact midface, thick neck, big frame, head full of hair, shaped eybrows, PCT. If these stadnards are met then the rest is up to preference. Some girls like upper eylied exposure while some others like hunter eyes. Some girls like musles , some don't. Some girls like straight eybrows, some like tilted ones.

This. 
I think some women like Germanic Chads, some like Celtic Chads, some like Mediterranean/Hispanic Chads. It's all about preference except, tallness, good frame, facial harmony and symmetry, strong Caucasian jawline, medium hair growth on body and a head full of hair etc.

 

[Deleted member 306]

This. 
I think some women like Germanic Chads, some like Celtic Chads, some like Mediterranean/Hispanic Chads. It's all about preference except, tallness, good frame, facial harmony and symmetry, strong Caucasian jawline, medium hair growth on body and a head full of hair etc.

Of course hitler's vision was to have only gemerna chads but still there can be differantations between them as well

 

[jagged0]

The floor level of the sexual market is both genetics and female standards. In a post-modern post-eugenics society where all men are by current standards 8/10 - 9.9/10, the sexual floor becomes 8/10. Here's how it would play out:

Current - Future
8/10 - 0/10
8.2/10 - 1/10
8.4/10 -  2/10
8.6/10 - 3/10
8.8/10 - 4/10 <- Anything below is practically guaranteed incel
9/10 - 5/10
9.2/10 - 6/10
9.4/10 - 7/10
9.6/10 - 8/10 <- Post-modern Chadism begins here
9.8/10 - 9/10
9.99../10 - 10/10 <-Post-modern GigaChad

^ Damn, you wrote this as I was typing out my scale. Pretty much this.


Super blind patriotism cope.

How would Europe defeat the US? I admit that we wouldn't win but they couldn't invade and defeat us either; not to mention even if the entire world fought us we'd be able to stalemate them or end in mutual destruction if we used our nukes.

 

[ironcrusher38]

Of course hitler's vision was to have only gemerna chads but still there can be differantations between them as well

Despite of popular belief, Germans are not mostly Nordic people. They have Central European people mostly. Bavarians and lower, Central Germany are not Germanic by blood. They're mixed with Celtics.

 

[Deleted member 306]

Despite of popular belief, Germans are not mostly Nordic people. They have Central European people mostly. Bavarians and lower, Central Germany are not Germanic by blood. They're mixed with Celtics.

This is interesting. I always assumed hitler tried to create guys like Chirs Carmack.

 

[ironcrusher38]

This is interesting. I always assumed hitler tried to create guys like Chirs Carmack.

Chris Carmack is a Cromagnid Faelid. Hitler loved skinny, frame lacking Nordics. I think he should have been supporting Faelids and paleoatlantids. Brad Pitt, Chris Carmack, Mat Damon, Michael Ballack these are all Faelids and it's Chad phenotype.

 

[Deleted member 306]

Chris Carmack is a Cromagnid Faelid. Hitler loved skinny, frame lacking Nordics. I think he should have been supporting Faelids and paleoatlantids. Brad Pitt, Chris Carmack, Mat Damon, Michael Ballack these are all Faelids and it's Chad phenotype.

So hitler wasn't browsing lookism.

 

[ironcrusher38]

So hitler wasn't browsing lookism.

Lookism is for fags. I'm speaking about phenotypes.

 

[Deleted member 306]

Lookism is for fags. I'm speaking about phenotypes.

So, wouldn't hitler's man appeal to women?

 

[blickpall]

The male beauty standards are very specific. Tall, strong jaw, compact midface, thick neck, big frame, head full of hair, shaped eybrows, PCT. If these stadnards are met then the rest is up to preference. Some girls like upper eylied exposure while some others like hunter eyes. Some girls like musles , some don't. Some girls like straight eybrows, some like tilted ones.

How are you not understanding that these beauty standards will change in respect to the altered genetic landscape? I don't understand. Women won't go for the least desirable male, even if that male is 8/10. He will be the one now relegated to inceldom, betabux, etc. because his genetics are inferior to his peers, just as ours are.

 

[nausea]

How are you not understanding that these beauty standards will change in respect to the altered genetic landscape? I don't understand. Women won't go for the least desirable male, even if that male is 8/10. He will be the one now relegated to inceldom, betabux, etc. because his genetics are inferior to his peers, just as ours are.

that's why our ancestors did the right thing with these demons

 

[theson]

Hitler also pooped his pants on a regular basis because of his IBS. He suffered from severe anal seepage and had to change his undergarments multiple times per day as a result.