Blackpill I would rather all women just be whores than this bullshit where we 'court' them as though they aren't

[SlayerSlayer]

Okay I'm reaching new blackpill theories. I'm starting to think that maybe our anger at whores is misguided-- for the opposite reason you'd think. What we are really angry at is women who AREN'T whores. Think about it.

If a woman is NOT a whore-- then she is impossible to fuck for non Chads. Like you have to be special. You aren't special. Most men aren't special enough for free pussy. This leads us to be more angry at ourselves for not being special. If EVERY woman just stopped this bullshit where they put themselves pedestal so high that they don't have a price, then the world would seem more fair-- that things wouldn't feel as genetically immutable-- that you can at least EARN your way into pussy.

If ALL women were just literal WHORES with a price to their pussy that ANYONE could buy then there would be nothing special about them-- which is the way it should be.

Also the entire idea of 'courtship' is gay. I think all relationships should be purely transactional. It's just less awkward.

IM I INSANE????

 

[ShiiOfTheSPLC]

IM I INSANE????

Yes

Inevitable outcome of being Asian American

 

[Fat Link]

Okay I'm reaching new blackpill theories. I'm starting to think that maybe our anger at whores is misguided-- for the opposite reason you'd think. What we are really angry at is women who AREN'T whores. Think about it.

If a woman is NOT a whore-- then she is impossible to fuck for non Chads. Like you have to be special. You aren't special. Most men aren't special enough for free pussy. This leads us to be more angry at ourselves for not being special. If EVERY woman just stopped this bullshit where they don't have a price, then the world would seem more fair-- that things dont feel as genetically immutable-- that you can at least EARN your way into pussy.

If ALL women were just literal WHORES with a price to their pussy that ANYONE could buy then there would be nothing special about them-- which is the way it should be

IM I INSANE????

No.

Your anger like most of us is at the lie.

That’s what most of us don’t understand for the longest time if we ever do come to this realization.

Our anger is ultimately missplaced.

Just as you said or rather explained it to be.

 

[Praise the Sun]

If the price for every foid was 0, then you're correct.

 

[Nihilistic Lowlife]

A bit too soy for me

 

[InMemoriam]

the sheer misogyny spawned on a daily in this abysmal site is unbearable!, you men need jesus, repent now! (in video game)

 

[LeFrenchCel]

The means of sex production should be seized by the state and redistributed without financial compensation to those in the need.

 

[Cope or die]

Okay I'm reaching new blackpill theories. I'm starting to think that maybe our anger at whores is misguided-- for the opposite reason you'd think. What we are really angry at is women who AREN'T whores. Think about it.

If a woman is NOT a whore-- then she is impossible to fuck for non Chads. Like you have to be special. You aren't special. Most men aren't special enough for free pussy. This leads us to be more angry at ourselves for not being special. If EVERY woman just stopped this bullshit where they don't have a price, then the world would seem more fair-- that things dont feel as genetically immutable-- that you can at least EARN your way into pussy.

If ALL women were just literal WHORES with a price to their pussy that ANYONE could buy then there would be nothing special about them-- which is the way it should be

IM I INSANE????

You have a point if you just want to encourage and embrace all women being whores. If thats your point, then i agree. If however, you want the majority of women to not be whores, and be "good" women instead, this is the wrong message. If you want more good women instead of whores then you should encourage the "good" women(non-whores) on the basis of them being rewarded with a good man/high value man/whatever they're looking for.

 

[runforrest]

"just be a cuck"

 

[SlayerSlayer]

You have a point if you just want to encourage and embrace all women being whores. If thats your point, then i agree. If however, you want the majority of women to not be whores, and be "good" women instead, this is the wrong message. If you want more good women instead of whores then you should encourage the "good" women(non-whores) on the basis of them being rewarded with a good man/high value man/whatever they're looking for.

Yes I want ALL women to be WHORES-- its more honest and fair. "Good" women are what create strife and agony-- because men want this, but only CHAD will get it.

If all women were just whores, Chad would get the same kind of whores any man could get.

 

[SlayerSlayer]

"just be a cuck"

if all men were cucks, would that matter?

My solution is to basically lower the bar for everyone into pure degeneracy

 

[the.oracle]

No, you are right, this is realism, oneitis and NAWALT are idealism, thus false
I truly wish all relationships were transactional, I don’t wish to “court” cumdumpsters JFL, i’d rather they be frank than to pretend like they have any special worth

 

[Cope or die]

Yes I want ALL women to be WHORES-- its more honest and fair. "Good" women are what create strife and agony-- because men want this, but only CHAD will get it.

If all women were just whores, Chad would get the same kind of whores any man could get.

if all men were cucks, would that matter?

My solution is to basically lower the bar for everyone into pure degeneracy

Ok. Agreed. We would be better off if all women were just whores with no pretense. It would be a more fair exchange. Which is why would never happen. If all women accepted being whores for sale to the highest bidder they wouldnt have anything to fall back on once they could no longer sell their bodies. As it is now they can be whores(paid or unpaid) in their youth with the gurantee that when they want to cash out they have a beta male(or the state) provider waiting for them.

 

[subhuman]

Houellebecq says the loosening of sexual morality only contributes to sexual inequality. Because instead of being forced to only have one partner and stay with him forever, foids are free to just fuck attractive guys. Laissez faire systems tend to be more like animal hierarchies found in nature. The sexual system is the same as the economy for example, where there is a few rich people who own all the wealth.

 

[kretschmer]

same

 

[subhuman]

Also, i think chads don’t even have to court. They just go and fuck. Courtship is just an excuse for foids to reject guys so they don’t have to tell them they’re ugly

 

[SlayerSlayer]

Houellebecq says the loosening of sexual morality only contributes to sexual inequality. Because instead of being forced to only have one partner and stay with him forever, foids are free to just fuck attractive guys. Laissez faire systems tend to be more like animal hierarchies found in nature. The sexual system is the same as the economy for example, where there is a few rich people who own all the wealth.

this isn't sexual anarchy though. This is more like if everyone was just a whore and treated sex as though it were a platonic service like painting a roof. You don't really care about who your individual clients are, as long as they pay you and treat you like a professional.

 

[subhuman]

this isn't sexual anarchy though. This is more like if everyone was just a whore and treated sex as though it were a platonic service like painting a roof. You don't really care about who your individual clients are, as long as they pay you and treat you like a professional.

Oh ok. Yeah I wish all foids were literal whores too

 

[Pikacel]

Tbh I don’t agree with this idea of foids being accessible to everybody. I’m not a cuck. I want a foid who only has eyes for me. I don’t want random men pumping and dumping my private holes

 

[ResidentHell]

Correct OP, I also share the same thought

Transactional sex is the only kind of sex that has no ambiguity or complexity about it. Its straightforward, and all of the parties involved have made their intentions known by agreeing to it

Whereas when people start sexual relations under the pretext of "love" or "romance", all it does is create extra room for deceit and potential future complications. Because people already know its pointless to "romance" if you aren't gonna have consistent access to sex. Its likely people use "love" relationships to try and purify or sanctify their primal desires

By coming across as if their intentions are righteous, pure or the will of a transcendental power (like a deity or spirit), they would use "love" or "romance" as the pretext for sexual contact. But in reality, all it does is create a meaningless and complicated bondage, because people (mostly women) cheat, and sex can be denied or withheld in a "love" relationship without any apparent reason (even though there may be a reason, just that the female doesn't want to reveal it). None of these complications are likely to happen in a sexual relation thats laid out to be purely transactional, but only in "romantic" relationships

 

[Indari]

[Based] All holes should be public fuck toilets like in the anime Dropout

 

[Reclusemaxxer]

Ok

 

[Deinogalerix]

If the price for every foid was 0, then you're correct.

This.

Holes should just be required to fuck any man who desires them. It's the only thing they are good for.

 

[SlayerSlayer]

Correct OP, I also share the same thought

Transactional sex is the only kind of sex that has no ambiguity or complexity about it. Its straightforward, and all of the parties involved have made their intentions known by agreeing to it

Whereas when people start sexual relations under the pretext of "love" or "romance", all it does is create extra room for deceit and potential future complications. Because people already know its pointless to "romance" if you aren't gonna have consistent access to sex. Its likely people use "love" relationships to try and purify or sanctify their primal desires

By coming across as if their intentions are righteous, pure or the will of a transcendental power (like a deity or spirit), they would use "love" or "romance" as the pretext for sexual contact. But in reality, all it does is create a meaningless and complicated bondage, because people (mostly women) cheat, and sex can be denied or withheld in a "love" relationship without any apparent reason (even though there may be a reason, just that the female doesn't want to reveal it). None of these complications are likely to happen in a sexual relation thats laid out to be purely transactional, but only in "romantic" relationships

thank you, you have explained it more clearly than I have. Sometimes I just go into a theory with no empathy whatsoever for people that dont understand basic things like love fundamentally not being a real thing.

I almost feel that if that we removed the idea of free love from culture, then it would solve the loneliness epidemic-- more time would be spent fucking and enjoying life objectively. This would be like Amazon of sexual supply. Sex and time spent with females would be on demand, and the sexual marketplace infinite,, and there would't be weird status games about it. It's hard to be a moralfag and say you "don't buy from Amazon" because it's the only option for everyone.

 

[ResidentHell]

I almost feel that if that we removed the idea of free love from culture, then it would solve the loneliness epidemic-- more time would be spent fucking and enjoying life objectively. This would be like Amazon of sexual supply. Sex and time spent with females would be on demand, and the sexual marketplace infinite,, and there would't be weird status games about it. It's hard to be a moralfag and say you "don't buy from Amazon" because it's the only option for everyone.

Agree. The normalization of transactional sex would surely help combat the current trend of increasing male celibacy. If love and sex were disassociated in modern culture, sex would be much more easy to access for all males including loners and hermits. Because it would provide a faster, more effective alternative to obtaining sex, rather than having to jestermax and simp for weeks, months or even years before the female just might allow them to fuck. Plus there would be less social stigma surrounding this method to obtain sex

The idea of "earning your way'" into sex with foid by impressing them with your personality (aka jestermaxxing) is pathetic. It encourages men to undergo long periods of simping and foid worship for a much lesser chance at receiving sex from a female who's already ran through multiple cocks. Plus we already know (zoomer) foids branchswing every few months or less, they cheat more often than men, they are naturally inclined to hypergamous behaviour, and they take interest in the financial situation of their partners

Foids will virtue signal by condemning the idea, but its not as if they aren't getting their vaginas ploughed out every week. Ordinary (zoomer) foids have sex nearly as often as occupational sex workers. Plus they both tend to have multiple different sex partners with time, and they both tend to have interest in the finances of their sex partners. Ordinary foids and sex workers are like two peas in a pod --- They arent that much different from each other in practice

 

[PointOfNoReturn]

Yes

Inevitable outcome of being Asian American

 

[Verxis]

"just be a cuck"

Brb, finna cuckmaxx. Got my chastity cage and got a BBC on the line for my date.

 

[MoreWeight94]

Japanese have taken this further: just search Hostess Bar. There even talking with women costs money. And they have "no hands policy".

I was dumbfounded how low they've sunk.

They call it "transactional love".

 

[Saint Cho]

Better idea.

Women should be property.