Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Serious I would like to debate moralfags.

Status
Not open for further replies.
PhenomSkillz

PhenomSkillz

Marxist Rodgerist Revolutionary
-
Joined
Jul 29, 2018
Posts
443
Seriously, the lawcucklodry is getting out of hand.
Give me specific, logical reasons as to why:

1) grown men being sexual with teenage women is a bad thing
2) redistribution of the vagina (as a form of capital) is a bad thing
3) revenge and retaliation against normans is a bad thing
4) the rape of promiscuous women is a bad thing
5) the practice of white shariah law is a bad thing
 
Different people have different morals. Accept that and dont be a sperging autist trying to change other peoples way of thinking. Good luck.
 
1719.jpg


Calling it now.
 
Different people have different morals. Accept that and dont be a sperging autist trying to change other peoples way of thinking. Good luck.
Not an argument.

Most these “moral” people who oppose the stuff I posted are one of the most wicked and degenerate individuals out there. It’s funny when promiscuity promoting cucks scream about “muh morals” whenever a grown male shows attraction to a teen foid.
1719.jpg


Calling it now.
I’m a Marxist rodgerist.
Nazism supports enforced monogamy.
 
Moralfag who believes in Objective morality here, lets get started
1) grown men being sexual with teenage women is a bad thing
Depends on the context. If its a traditional monogamous relationship with a grown man 25 and under, I can't see a problem with it. If its purely for sexual reasons/pump and dump, it's degenerate and only creates more sluts. Male Slutmakers deserve worse punishment than childlike females.
2) redistribution of the vagina (as a form of capital) is a bad thing
There's better ways to gurantee vagina to incels that don't involve forced relationships. You can enforce monogamy a variant of different ways.
3) revenge and retaliation against normans is a bad thing
Elaborate
4) the rape of promiscuous women is a bad thing
Women have the brain of a Child, what's rape going to solve? Should it be okay to rape a promiscuous orphan prostituting themselves on the streets and sleeping with adults out of their own volition? The only way to fix a promiscuous woman, someone who has been brainwashed all her life, is to counter brainwash her yourself. You could even have statewide centers for this kind of thing. Also various forms of Enforced Monogamy would basically prevent this from happening in the first place.
5) the practice of white shariah law is a bad thing
Islam is a degenerate war religion is why.
 
Good luck debating these cucks, they will prob just call you "cringy" or "edgy"
 
Moralfag who believes in Objective morality here, lets get started

Depends on the context. If its a traditional monogamous relationship with a grown man 25 and under, I can't see a problem with it.

Why not a 30 year old man, even?

There's better ways to gurantee vagina to incels that don't involve forced relationships. You can enforce monogamy a variant of different ways.

Alright elaborate on these better ways.
How is enforced monogamy superior to redistributing the pussy? Enforced monogamy is literally betabux, but you get a virgin foid as a wife instead of a used up one.


Elaborate

You know what I mean by that... hint: look at the “furthest to the right” guy on my profile picture.

Women have the brain of a Child, what's rape going to solve? Should it be okay to rape a promiscuous orphan prostituting themselves on the streets and sleeping with adults out of their own volition? The only way to fix a promiscuous woman, someone who has been brainwashed all her life, is to counter brainwash her yourself. You could even have statewide centers for this kind of thing. Also various forms of Enforced Monogamy would basically prevent this from happening in the first place.

Why should rape on promiscuous women be illegal though? You can’t undo the damage that promiscuous women would have gone through. Once they fucked Chad, it ended.
Again, I told you why enforced monogamy is cucked, and basically another version of betabux. The woman you marry won’t be attracted to you and barely give you any sex.


Islam is a degenerate war religion is why.

Elaborate.
 
I’m a Marxist rodgerist.
:soy::soy::soy::soy::soy::soy:
Nazism supports enforced monogamy.
>Imagine being an Incel and not supporting enforced monogamy
JFL
Why not a 30 year old man, even?
You stop growing mentally and physically at 25 on average. A 30 year old boomer isn't really going to be optimal culturally or generationally for his wife, most men and women should be having a family by 25, if you aren't having a family by 25, it's over. Let people fuck their own age groups instead of double dipping into others.
Alright elaborate on these better ways.
How is enforced monogamy superior to redistributing the pussy? Enforced monogamy is literally betabux, but you get a virgin foid as a wife instead of a used up one.
>Wanting a used up roastie whore over a pure virgin wife
:soy::soy::soy::soy:

Seriously tho, how is it better? Well firstly its a lot easier to enforce than enslaving whores, secondly as for the "Betabux" low IQ cope, all women are attracted to resources. This is just biological nature, with enforced monogamy however it highly limits the chance of golddiggers, and unrealistic expectations, because once men and women choose, it is over. Also women are much better wives when they're virgins. Higher reported happiness between both partners, better sex, better children, lower divorce rates, of course compared to le epic cuck tears bait enslaving thots. Idk man maybe some of don't want to pass around the used up mentally broken cuck hole and actually want a woman who loves us and makes the world a better place in the process.
You know what I mean by that... hint: look at the “furthest to the right” guy on my profile picture.
What to go ER? You also know he would be much more aligned more with Natsocs than (((Marxists))) right? But yeah i'm actually not sure what you mean, normies aren't the enemy, they're a symptom, not the disease.
Why should rape on promiscuous women be illegal though? You can’t undo the damage that promiscuous women would have gone through. Once they fucked Chad, it ended.

They did it in Germany to a degree. Berlin was rampant with degeneracy during the weimar republic, filled with whores, once Hitler came along with various enforced monogamy programs you didn't really hear about that anymore did you, and it's not like they just went around and executed all the whores or something. Of course you could make the argument that, while Berlin, and various other cities were degenerate Marxist hellholes, most of Germany was still more traditional, which fair enough, but the level of degeneracy whores have reached in shere numbers has never happened in history before, and can only possibly be compared to theoretical depictions of Soddom of Gomorrah by Antelluvian Advanced Civilization conspiracy theorists.

If you combine enforced monogamy with counter brainwashing facilities where you send these women to be made traditional, possibly even forget their slutty past entirely with advanced technology/brainwashing techniques, its a much better solution that leads to a much happier society, than lmao just make raping whores legal. Rape is degenerate because its not monogamous, and basically on the level of child abuse, because women are literally that retarded.
Again, I told you why enforced monogamy is cucked, and basically another version of betabux.

You really haven't tho.
The woman you marry won’t be attracted to you and barely give you any sex.

Baseless claim, and a low IQ cope. Virgin marriages report the highest happiness rates, sex lives, and the list goes on and on and on.
Elaborate.

Women have the mental capacity of a child, we were focusing on Sharia law specifically, so a religion with laws that basically justify child abuse on women who are basically drugged out on estrogen, brainwashing, and less synapses in the brain isn't really a good thing, when there's much better ways to handle said situations as I listed above.
 
Morality is for the masses.
 
Moralfag who believes in Objective morality here, lets get started

Depends on the context. If its a traditional monogamous relationship with a grown man 25 and under, I can't see a problem with it. If its purely for sexual reasons/pump and dump, it's degenerate and only creates more sluts. Male Slutmakers deserve worse punishment than childlike females.

There's better ways to gurantee vagina to incels that don't involve forced relationships. You can enforce monogamy a variant of different ways.

Elaborate

Women have the brain of a Child, what's rape going to solve? Should it be okay to rape a promiscuous orphan prostituting themselves on the streets and sleeping with adults out of their own volition? The only way to fix a promiscuous woman, someone who has been brainwashed all her life, is to counter brainwash her yourself. You could even have statewide centers for this kind of thing. Also various forms of Enforced Monogamy would basically prevent this from happening in the first place.

Islam is a degenerate war religion is why.
Saved me a lot of time my good sir.
 
:soy::soy::soy::soy::soy::soy:

>Imagine being an Incel and not supporting enforced monogamy
JFL

You stop growing mentally and physically at 25 on average. A 30 year old boomer isn't really going to be optimal culturally or generationally for his wife, most men and women should be having a family by 25, if you aren't having a family by 25, it's over. Let people fuck their own age groups instead of double dipping into others.

As if women continue to “grow mentally” in relation to making good sexual decisions (the fuck is this cope?) after puberty, JFL

What if it’s a 30 year old incel who was a virgin u til your enforced monogamous laws were enforced? Fuck of outta here, disrespecting 30+ oldcels like that.
>Wanting a used up roastie whore over a pure virgin wife
:soy::soy::soy::soy:

Seriously tho, how is it better? Well firstly its a lot easier to enforce than enslaving whores, secondly as for the "Betabux" low IQ cope, all women are attracted to resources. This is just biological nature, with enforced monogamy however it highly limits the chance of golddiggers, and unrealistic expectations, because once men and women choose, it is over. Also women are much better wives when they're virgins. Higher reported happiness between both partners, better sex, better children, lower divorce rates, of course compared to le epic cuck tears bait enslaving thots. Idk man maybe some of don't want to pass around the used up mentally broken cuck hole and actually want a woman who loves us and makes the world a better place in the process.

you believe pure virgins won’t be redistributed to the highest IQ incels as a form of “compensation” for their sexual deprivation?
Promiscuous women under marxism rodgerism would be stoned. You do know that under enforced monogamy if you don’t have status or money then you’re basically fucked, right?


What to go ER? You also know he would be much more aligned more with Natsocs than (((Marxists))) right? But yeah i'm actually not sure what you mean, normies aren't the enemy, they're a symptom, not the disease.

How??? He literally discussed sexual inequality and how all the Chads are getting the women. Did you even read his book bro?

They did it in Germany to a degree. Berlin was rampant with degeneracy during the weimar republic, filled with whores, once Hitler came along with various enforced monogamy programs you didn't really hear about that anymore did you, and it's not like they just went around and executed all the whores or something. Of course you could make the argument that, while Berlin, and various other cities were degenerate Marxist hellholes, most of Germany was still more traditional, which fair enough, but the level of degeneracy whores have reached in shere numbers has never happened in history before, and can only possibly be compared to theoretical depictions of Soddom of Gomorrah by Antelluvian Advanced Civilization conspiracy theorists.

Under Marxism rodgerism, you won’t have degeneracy. It’s just that we force virgin foids to be with individual men and make as many babies as possible to produce even more virgin foids for the next generations. The woman won’t be just used for “muh marriage.” She will literally be a breeder and a sex toy for the incel in question.

If you combine enforced monogamy with counter brainwashing facilities where you send these women to be made traditional, possibly even forget their slutty past entirely with advanced technology/brainwashing techniques, its a much better solution that leads to a much happier society, than lmao just make raping whores legal. Rape is degenerate because its not monogamous, and basically on the level of child abuse, because women are literally that retarded.

Lmao first of all you’re comparing abusing children to abusing foids. Children aren’t pubertal. A child female doesn’t have tits or an ass. What the fuck are you talking about when you say “counter brainwashing” facilities LMAOOO. Giga cope! Once she gets exposed to a chad there’s no going back. The damage has already been done. You want us to fuck used up roast beef?

You really haven't tho.

I did. It’s basically betabuxxing 2.0. The woman won’t even give you that much sex since she won’t be attracted to you.

Baseless claim, and a low IQ cope. Virgin marriages report the highest happiness rates, sex lives, and the list goes on and on and on.

Sources? Maybe there’s physical attraction in these marriages, but usually under the enforced monogamy era the husband was fucking cucked and only had sex with the woman to have 3 kids with her (lol). Also she becomes used up past a certain age, and it wouldn’t make sense to stay with her. She just needs to have as many kids as possible for the future generation when she mates with incels, and then tuss her over to the Chads.

Women have the mental capacity of a child, we were focusing on Sharia law specifically, so a religion with laws that basically justify child abuse on women who are basically drugged out on estrogen, brainwashing, and less synapses in the brain isn't really a good thing, when there's much better ways to handle said situations as I listed above.

Lolll again low IQ argument and cope tbh

Child abuse = literally raping children or doing bad stuff to them. Women aren’t children. They may be kids mentally but their sexual mature bodies make them evil whores.

 
Seriously, the lawcucklodry is getting out of hand.
Give me specific, logical reasons as to why:

1) grown men being sexual with teenage women is a bad thing
2) redistribution of the vagina (as a form of capital) is a bad thing
3) revenge and retaliation against normans is a bad thing
4) the rape of promiscuous women is a bad thing
5) the practice of white shariah law is a bad thing
You sound like a degenerate commie (for sex), if that's the case you need disappear.
1. Maybe actual matured "teenagers"
2. If you mean prostitution then that's already legal in many parts of the world and I think it should be legal because as long as one adult wants money and the other wants sex they should be able to make the exchange.
3. If you're a terrorist then dont bitch about wanting to retaliation rights because then you can easily a victim of the same retaliation you want so bad.
4. Being a rapist is as degenerate as being a slut, also if someone deems an autistic man (autistic man is comparable to a women in intellect) premuscuios does that mean its okay to rape him? No so if you want sex then pay up or find a way.
5. Islam is an ancient war religion based on pure falsehoods, Shariah fucks men over almost as much as women, not to mention rape is illegal under shariah so that contradicts #4, lastly to have sex with someone under shariah you have to marry them so enjoy betabuxxing.
 
People can argue endlessly against anything without a common starting point. What I'm saying is logical debate has to start with an agreement on points relevant to the topic.

I'm amoral, so do whatever the fuck you want. I don't judge!

Moralfag who believes in Objective morality here, .
This is something I'm interested in: I can't imagine how anyone can believe in objective morality (without bringing god into the debate). Really, why is morality objective, and where/what are the moral rules to follow?

I assume you must agree that people have differences in their own rules/feelings of morality, and if that's true, how can morality be objective?
 
Last edited:
You sound like a degenerate commie (for sex), if that's the case you need disappear.
1. Maybe actual matured "teenagers"

I agree.


2. If you mean prostitution then that's already legal in many parts of the world and I think it should be legal because as long as one adult wants money and the other wants sex they should be able to make the exchange.

Redistributing foids isn’t prostitution. Basically all the young fertile virgins will be distributed equally among incels and average males and have as many babies as possible. Then, when their smv decreases they should be tossed to chadlites-chads. This way chads don’t get anything “real,” or barely get anything, while incels and average Norman’s get all the good puss puss.

3. If you're a terrorist then dont bitch about wanting to retaliation rights because then you can easily a victim of the same retaliation you want so bad.

Most incels right now don’t give a shit if they actually were victims of some attack tbh
It’s just a way of educational campaign against bullies who tell us to “just b ourselves.” We have to stand up and fight.

4. Being a rapist is as degenerate as being a slut, also if someone deems an autistic man (autistic man is comparable to a women in intellect) premuscuios does that mean its okay to rape him? No so if you want sex then pay up or find a way.

Raping a slut isn’t degenerate. She’s a slut either way and takes dick thrusts in all of her holes. She’s fuckin’ promiscuous. Rape is literally when she receives “unwanted” sex from an ugly male.

5. Islam is an ancient war religion based on pure falsehoods, Shariah fucks men over almost as much as women, not to mention rape is illegal under shariah so that contradicts #4, lastly to have sex with someone under shariah you have to marry them so enjoy betabuxxing.

Enforced monogamy is literally betabuxxing, faggot. White shariah isn’t necessarily Islamic shariah. White shariah is more race based; and less religious based, although thots who want to escape the redistributing policy will be dealt with.
 
If you believe all women should be distributed then you are a commie faggot, if you want to be a dumbass at least say they should be bought and sold not just collected and handed out.
What the fuck is race based shariah? I think you dont understand shariah at all and you just want a Race based communist society, the problem is this society would easily fall apart because no one wants to live in a military state or give up there daughters first free
 
If you believe all women should be distributed then you are a commie faggot, if you want to be a dumbass at least say they should be bought and sold not just collected and handed out.
What the fuck is race based shariah? I think you dont understand shariah at all and you just want a Race based communist society, the problem is this society would easily fall apart because no one wants to live in a military state or give up there daughters first free
The incel government will be in charge of distributing the females to give us their sex.
 
You seriously need to learn how to format bro.
As if women continue to “grow mentally” in relation to making good sexual decisions (the fuck is this cope?) after puberty, JFL
This is a strawman. I never said women grow mentally in relation to making good sexual decisions. Women making good sexual decisions tends to come from having a close nit traditional biological mother and father who encourage monogamous behavior and a traditional lifestyle her entire life growing up.
What if it’s a 30 year old incel who was a virgin u til your enforced monogamous laws were enforced? Fuck of outta here, disrespecting 30+ oldcels like that.
They could go for one of the 26-40 year old roasties who got sent to a counterbrainwashing facility and had their minds wiped and made more traditional. There's nothing worse than being a youngcel and seeing girls your aged being demolished by older men, who by nature have a higher SMV. It's degenerate.
you believe pure virgins won’t be redistributed to the highest IQ incels as a form of “compensation” for their sexual deprivation?
Sounds like a degenerate cope when you could have laws, systems, and cultures in place that basically gurantee 95% of women to be pure virgins in the first place. The fact the pure virgin women are becoming more rare, especially in areas destroyed by the sexual revolution and marxism, doesn't mean it was like this in the past for hundreds of years.
Promiscuous women under marxism rodgerism would be stoned.
Hello cucktears
You do know that under enforced monogamy if you don’t have status or money then you’re basically fucked, right?
Literally fucking how? You'd only be fucked if you don't have status or money in a society WITHOUT enforced monogamy because women would be being pumped and dumped by the same fucking top 20% of men constantly. With Enforced Monogamy, there will always be a looksmatch/statusmatched girl who will have to choose YOU or nothing, and girls backed into a corner like that generally tend to make the choice, and happily.
How??? He literally discussed sexual inequality and how all the Chads are getting the women. Did you even read his book bro?
And why are Chad getting all the women? Because they have no restrictions, because enforced monogamy does not exist. In a traditional, monogamous society, Chad would be married to Stacy, and ONLY Stacy, he wouldn't double dip into the lower echelons and corrupt women, and create the very systems which create the culture for Incels to exist in the first place.
Under Marxism rodgerism, you won’t have degeneracy. It’s just that we force virgin foids to be with individual men and make as many babies as possible to produce even more virgin foids for the next generations. The woman won’t be just used for “muh marriage.” She will literally be a breeder and a sex toy for the incel in question.
Low IQ degenerate solution. Good people come from good families, not breeders. A womans soul purpose being to birthmaxx is a retarded cope. With enforced monogamy, and programs designed to encourage good mothers and trad women like you had in WW2 Germany, women will be having tons of children and be good mothers with their statusmatched/looksmatched husbands willingly and happily.
Lmao first of all you’re comparing abusing children to abusing foids. Children aren’t pubertal. A child female doesn’t have tits or an ass.
Their physical appearance has nothing to do with their mental capacity. If you put the mind of a child into an adult body this doesn't somehow justify abusing the child.
What the fuck are you talking about when you say “counter brainwashing” facilities LMAOOO. Giga cope! Once she gets exposed to a chad there’s no going back. The damage has already been done. You want us to fuck used up roast beef?
Black Hole IQ, brainwashing techniques and experiments have been done successfully in many government programs/research facilities. It really wouldn't be hard to brainwash a woman/use modern technological advancements to develop a way to wipe her memories/rewire her past. It's not exactly ethical, but its much more ethical than having a whore out there making society as a whole worse, and its also much more ethical than raping/killing her.
I did. It’s basically betabuxxing 2.0. The woman won’t even give you that much sex since she won’t be attracted to you.
Went over this above. Mega cope.
https://ifstudies.org/blog/counteri...between-premarital-sex-and-marital-stability/
http://cdn.freedomainradio.com/FDR_2899_Marriage_Partners_Study.pdf
I could list some more aswell, but these cover the basics.
Maybe there’s physical attraction in these marriages, but usually under the enforced monogamy era the husband was fucking cucked and only had sex with the woman to have 3 kids with her (lol).
This is the optimal number to not only increase the population, but raise the children effeciently, especially if they were all had in succession. Having more than 3 kids can cause problems in terms of optimal childhood development, unless of course you're in a polygamous traditional relationship with multiple traditional mothers who could fulfill duties much better, but needs more data, and not really relevant to my side or your "side"
Also she becomes used up past a certain age, and it wouldn’t make sense to stay with her.
There's love and sex, you've already fulfilled your biological duty, you've won the game, it doesn't matter.
She just needs to have as many kids as possible for the future generation when she mates with incels, and then tuss her over to the Chads.
Extreme cope, already went over how this can lead to issues twice now.
Lolll again low IQ argument and cope tbh
The only thing low here seems to be your Chromosome count buddy.
Child abuse = literally raping children or doing bad stuff to them. Women aren’t children. They may be kids mentally but their sexual mature bodies make them evil whores.
Covered this already. Also
>But their sexual mature bodies make them evil whores
You're actually a mentalcel my dude, what the fuck does their physical appearance have to do with their mental capabilities. Anyways I already went over this above.
 
The incel government will be in charge of distributing the females to give us their sex.
Communist governments are supposed to be in charge of distributing the wealth.
 
You seriously need to learn how to format bro.

This is a strawman. I never said women grow mentally in relation to making good sexual decisions. Women making good sexual decisions tends to come from having a close nit traditional biological mother and father who encourage monogamous behavior and a traditional lifestyle her entire life growing up.

Yes but that’s a cope. When analyzing their natural instincts they are hypergamous and immoral: even if you encourage them to be monogamous they won’t be attracted to their partner and not give him their true sexual desires. Betabux.

They could go for one of the 26-40 year old roasties who got sent to a counterbrainwashing facility and had their minds wiped and made more traditional. There's nothing worse than being a youngcel and seeing girls your aged being demolished by older men, who by nature have a higher SMV. It's degenerate.

Why the fuck do you want oldcels to go for used up foids? I think it’s Degenerate for youngcels to even breed tbh. Teen foids should be mostly left for grown men. They will even make better decisions with her, in case something happens.

Sounds like a degenerate cope when you could have laws, systems, and cultures in place that basically gurantee 95% of women to be pure virgins in the first place. The fact the pure virgin women are becoming more rare, especially in areas destroyed by the sexual revolution and marxism, doesn't mean it was like this in the past for hundreds of years.

I know it wasn’t like this in the past. But then again enforced monogamy is literally “betabuxxing with a virgin”
The woman won’t like you, won’t have many kids with you, and you’ll end up on r/deadbedrooms.


Hello cucktears

Literally fucking how? You'd only be fucked if you don't have status or money in a society WITHOUT enforced monogamy because women would be being pumped and dumped by the same fucking top 20% of men constantly. With Enforced Monogamy, there will always be a looksmatch/statusmatched girl who will have to choose YOU or nothing, and girls backed into a corner like that generally tend to make the choice, and happily.

Do you even know how arranged marriages work you fucking idiot? You have to have a stable income for the father to consider giving you a woman. So low IQ. The hotter the woman, the richer and higher status you have to be.

And why are Chad getting all the women? Because they have no restrictions, because enforced monogamy does not exist. In a traditional, monogamous society, Chad would be married to Stacy, and ONLY Stacy, he wouldn't double dip into the lower echelons and corrupt women, and create the very systems which create the culture for Incels to exist in the first place.

But chad would have a happy sex filled marriage while the incels would quickly post to r/deadbedrooms because there’s no sexual attraction, faggot.

Low IQ degenerate solution. Good people come from good families, not breeders. A womans soul purpose being to birthmaxx is a retarded cope. With enforced monogamy, and programs designed to encourage good mothers and trad women like you had in WW2 Germany, women will be having tons of children and be good mothers with their statusmatched/looksmatched husbands willingly and happily.

Anything other than birthmaxxing for women is a cope and a feminist psyop.
They will be good mothers but the husbands won’t be getting their dick wet.


Their physical appearance has nothing to do with their mental capacity. If you put the mind of a child into an adult body this doesn't somehow justify abusing the child.

Lol? Abusing the child nowadays is literally having consensual sex with him. If I have consensual sex with a woman then am I abusing her because she thinks like a child? Or even if I marry her as you stated? I mean it’s literally abuse if you have to only consider her mental abilities. Marrying children is a form of abuse lol. Retarded cope.

Black Hole IQ, brainwashing techniques and experiments have been done successfully in many government programs/research facilities. It really wouldn't be hard to brainwash a woman/use modern technological advancements to develop a way to wipe her memories/rewire her past. It's not exactly ethical, but its much more ethical than having a whore out there making society as a whole worse, and its also much more ethical than raping/killing her.

LoL? Why the fuck do we want a used up roast beef, even if she underwent a “brainwashing” experiment? She still has fucked 100 different men. Systems to actually change her perceptions won’t matter. Raping a whore is ethnical because a whore is a whore. Simple. She deserves rape because she’s a whore.

Went over this above. Mega cope.

https://ifstudies.org/blog/counteri...between-premarital-sex-and-marital-stability/
http://cdn.freedomainradio.com/FDR_2899_Marriage_Partners_Study.pdf
I could list some more aswell, but these cover the basics.

GIGA COPE. These studies aren’t about the husband being truly happy. They’re about stability, I.e. the likeliness of the woman to stay with the man and not fucking cheat. Low IQ.
Plus many men brainwash themselves and lie to themselves that they’re happy anyway.


This is the optimal number to not only increase the population, but raise the children effeciently, especially if they were all had in succession. Having more than 3 kids can cause problems in terms of optimal childhood development, unless of course you're in a polygamous traditional relationship with multiple traditional mothers who could fulfill duties much better, but needs more data, and not really relevant to my side or your "side"

The incel father will be in charge of raising the children effectively if the child is a human male. However if it’s a female then by your logic she can’t grow up. She will remain as a kid.

There's love and sex, you've already fulfilled your biological duty, you've won the game, it doesn't matter.

So you would go for a used up foid if we somehow completely changed her mind? Do you love rotten roast beef?

Extreme cope, already went over how this can lead to issues twice now.

Your solution is a cope.

The only thing low here seems to be your Chromosome count buddy.

Cope.

Covered this already. Also
>But their sexual mature bodies make them evil whores
You're actually a mentalcel my dude, what the fuck does their physical appearance have to do with their mental capabilities. Anyways I already went over this above.

And I already showed why this is bullshit. You’re literally justifying marrying children by your logic, which is a form of abuse.

Communist governments are supposed to be in charge of distributing the wealth.
That’s why I’m an MR, not a M.
 
This is something I'm interested in: I can't imagine how anyone can believe in objective morality (without bringing god into the debate). Really, why is morality objective, and where/what are the moral rules to follow?
I used to be an Atheist and a Subjectivist, but the more I studied biology, data, and certain secular philosophical outlooks on objective morality I started to realize there are certain actions and things that lead to positive outcomes for humanity. This combined with my studies on Abrahamic Religions, specifically Christianity, I found that all the positives that I found on my own volition, outside of religion, lined up perfectly with Christianity, along with the fact everyone pushing things that seem to lead to bad outcomes for humanity seem to be anti Christian in nature, which did lead me to become a Neo Christian Biblical Literalist. However I do not argue for or preach Christianity, I feel like if you push people to the truth, Christianity will find them on its own.
I assume you must agree that people have differences in their own rules/feelings of morality, and if that's true, how can morality be objective?
I believe people can view things subjectively through a lens and still be objectively wrong.
 
I used to be an Atheist and a Subjectivist, but the more I studied biology, data, and certain secular philosophical outlooks on objective morality I started to realize there are certain actions and things that lead to positive outcomes for humanity..
Why do you assume a positive outcome for humanity is desirable, and how can you know which actions will result in this positive outcome?
 
Low IQ post :feelstastyman:
Giga High IQ thread:what:

jfl at subhumans who believe in objective morality and in the salvation of the West though islamic laws.

Being a "marxist" you should send yourself to Gulag asap OP ... :lul::blackpill::blackpill::blackpill:
 
Low IQ post :feelstastyman:
Giga High IQ thread:what:

jfl at subhumans who believe in objective morality and in the salvation of the West though islamic laws.

Being a "marxist" you should send yourself to Gulag asap OP ... :lul::blackpill::blackpill::blackpill:
Marxism rodgerism is the only solution.
 
Yes but that’s a cope. When analyzing their natural instincts they are hypergamous and immoral
Everyone is immoral when they rely entirely on natural instincts, and hypergamy is an evolutionary trait designed for savage times to breed more war ready men. Hypergamy does not exist in traditional societies or households at least not to as an extreme degree because biologically speaking a patriarchy to enforce monogamy, during childhood, and in society creates an evolutionary awareness that hypergamy is not necessary. There is no need to breed for war. The breakdown of society to encourage hypergamy is a Marxist construct designed to destroy society and make it more savage.

There is a reason why I can't get a girlfriend where I live in L.A, a leftist marxist hellhole, but if I go to Montana or various other rural states for example I could find a looksmatch/statusmatch really easily, because their culture does not favor hypergamy. Thus is the plight of a being a locationcel, I guess you wouldn't understand since you're a mentalcel clearly.
even if you encourage them to be monogamous they won’t be attracted to their partner and not give him their true sexual desires. Betabux.
Extreme cope, already proven false several times aswell.
Why the fuck do you want oldcels to go for used up foids?
Used up foids are for the most part only a problem because of the mental damage caused to them by whoring around. Easily fixed via brainwashing.
I think it’s Degenerate for youngcels to even breed tbh. Teen foids should be mostly left for grown men. They will even make better decisions with her, in case something happens.
Its more degenerate for Old men to steal women from young males. Females give boys the motivation to become men, this is the problem many young boys face. In the past as society was getting more and more traditional, especially in late stage traditionalism before Marxism destroyed everything, you'd have these young boys getting together with their highschool sweethearts and being motivated to get jobs and be successful, have a family by 25, etc etc, and with proper parents and culture they'll be on the right track and making good decisions at a very young age anyways.
I know it wasn’t like this in the past. But then again enforced monogamy is literally “betabuxxing with a virgin”
The woman won’t like you, won’t have many kids with you, and you’ll end up on r/deadbedrooms.
Saying betabuxxing still doesn't prove shit and is still a cope. So is pretending the woman wont like or fuck you despite all the data to the contrary and hundreds of years of history of that aswell. Dead bedrooms only happen because cucks marry used up whores who expect too much from their beta male husbands because they always have it in the back of their mind they deserve a rich chad prince charming because they fucked them once. This is something that simply does not happen in trad virgin marriages.
Do you even know how arranged marriages work you fucking idiot? You have to have a stable income for the father to consider giving you a woman. So low IQ. The hotter the woman, the richer and higher status you have to be.
I'm not arguing for arranged marriages brainlet, in a traditional society with enforced monogamy people would be looksmatched and statusmatched. If you're not a chad you shouldn't expect a stacy. You should expect someone who looks and is worth just as much as you are.
But chad would have a happy sex filled marriage while the incels would quickly post to r/deadbedrooms because there’s no sexual attraction, faggot.
Again, you have to ignore all data, and cope to believe this. Already went over this.
Anything other than birthmaxxing for women is a cope and a feminist psyop.
Anything more than 3 children is generally pretty unstable for the child and general raising capabilities of the parents to gurantee their children turn out well.
They will be good mothers but the husbands won’t be getting their dick wet.
Back to this bullshit cope. Fact is buddy, only cucks who marry non virgins have dull sex lives. Virgin Married Couples are fucking till they're old.
Lol? Abusing the child nowadays is literally having consensual sex with him. If I have consensual sex with a woman then am I abusing her because she thinks like a child? Or even if I marry her as you stated? Or even if I marry her as you stated? I mean it’s literally abuse if you have to only consider her mental abilities. Marrying children is a form of abuse lol. Retarded cope.
No, because in a traditional marriage nobody is getting hurt during sex. It doesn't matter if she has the mind of a child if you're not doing any harm to society and you're both enjoying yourself. The abuse comes from manipulation, pumping and dumping, rape, physical abuse, etc. This is ACTUAL real abuse that is highly immoral considering their mental inferiority.
LoL? Why the fuck do we want a used up roast beef, even if she underwent a “brainwashing” experiment? She still has fucked 100 different men. Systems to actually change her perceptions won’t matter. Raping a whore is ethnical because a whore is a whore. Simple. She deserves rape because she’s a whore.
We went over this already aswell, the main problem is her mental state from fucking all those men, not the fact that she's fucked all those men. The reason why men get so worked up about women having multiple partners, at least the ones who aren't cucked, is because its a biological natural response against an unstable and unloyal partner basically. If she doesn't even know she's fucked 100 men, if she's been brainwashed to be that conservative trad woman, it doesn't fucking matter. What she doesn't know she doesn't need to know, and the man doesn't need to know either because all the negative effects from those multiple partners wont exist anymore, and we went over the rape thing already aswell.
GIGA COPE. These studies aren’t about the husband being truly happy. They’re about stability, I.e. the likeliness of the woman to stay with the man and not fucking cheat. Low IQ.
Plus many men brainwash themselves and lie to themselves that they’re happy anyway.
You clearly haven't read the studies fully, here's another one tho, got more aswell, feel free to ask for anything specifically aswell. There's a reason why they're not getting divorced and reporting happiness. Women are happy when their husbands are happy. Their Husbands are happy because they're having sex and enjoying eachothers company and actually love eachother. You can cope and pretend they brainwashed themselves into being happy all you want, all the data is against you. Get fucked.
https://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2012-10/afps-dtl101712.php
The incel father will be in charge of raising the children effectively if the child is a human male.
All evidence and data points to the fact that Children need a good biological father AND mother to turn out correctly. There are things only mothers can offer children than a father can't, that's just a fact, and vice versa. Children end up fucked up in single parent households, and in households where a parent is distant, usually more common with fathers, but it happens with mothers aswell.
However if it’s a female then by your logic she can’t grow up. She will remain as a kid.
Strawman, just because a female is more childlike and mentally inferior, doesn't mean she doesn't have a purpose. Everything is about duality. Stability requires pairs of two. This is just nature. A woman mentally matures in different ways than a man, for different purposes.
So you would go for a used up foid if we somehow completely changed her mind? Do you love rotten roast beef?
The roastie meme is just a meme created to trigger and fuck with and shame whores. I wouldn't go for a woman if I knew she was used up, but the whole point of this program is to make her believe she isn't and in fact convince and brainwash her into being a traditional woman believes she's a virgin, and if she believes it/the brainwashing was successful, the positive effects would transfer to her partner.
Your solution is a cope.
My solution, is the only solution. Better than your Low IQ cucktears bait.
And I already showed why this is bullshit. You’re literally justifying marrying children by your logic, which is a form of abuse.
The only thing you've shown is your extreme lack of understanding of how the world actually works.
 
Moralfag who believes in Objective morality here
The philosophy of Ayn Rand? It seems to make so many baseless conclusions to reach its points like that there is inherent significance to human happiness. It's sort of a philosophy of selfishness that still maintains the basic psychologically intuitive values of crimes like rape and murder being wrong simply because it impedes the interests of other people. This completely ignores existentialism and the question of "why are people even important to begin with?"
 
Why do you assume a positive outcome for humanity is desirable
Because i'm not a cuck who hates my own species, that's nihilistic Jewish nonsense that goes against basic evolutionary survival.
and how can you know which actions will result in this positive outcome?
Years of research and data.
 
Because i'm not a cuck who hates my own species, that's nihilistic Jewish nonsense that goes against basic evolutionary survival..
That's where we differ. ;-)
I think you'll run into more misanthropists than you'd like. You don't seem to like jews, would you like all of them killed?
 
too low iq to understand what is going on in this thread :feelstastyman:
 
OP:

1531854972477

:soy::soy::soy::soy::soy::soy:

>Imagine being an Incel and not supporting enforced monogamy
JFL

You stop growing mentally and physically at 25 on average. A 30 year old boomer isn't really going to be optimal culturally or generationally for his wife, most men and women should be having a family by 25, if you aren't having a family by 25, it's over. Let people fuck their own age groups instead of double dipping into others.

>Wanting a used up roastie whore over a pure virgin wife
:soy::soy::soy::soy:

Seriously tho, how is it better? Well firstly its a lot easier to enforce than enslaving whores, secondly as for the "Betabux" low IQ cope, all women are attracted to resources. This is just biological nature, with enforced monogamy however it highly limits the chance of golddiggers, and unrealistic expectations, because once men and women choose, it is over. Also women are much better wives when they're virgins. Higher reported happiness between both partners, better sex, better children, lower divorce rates, of course compared to le epic cuck tears bait enslaving thots. Idk man maybe some of don't want to pass around the used up mentally broken cuck hole and actually want a woman who loves us and makes the world a better place in the process.

What to go ER? You also know he would be much more aligned more with Natsocs than (((Marxists))) right? But yeah i'm actually not sure what you mean, normies aren't the enemy, they're a symptom, not the disease.

They did it in Germany to a degree. Berlin was rampant with degeneracy during the weimar republic, filled with whores, once Hitler came along with various enforced monogamy programs you didn't really hear about that anymore did you, and it's not like they just went around and executed all the whores or something. Of course you could make the argument that, while Berlin, and various other cities were degenerate Marxist hellholes, most of Germany was still more traditional, which fair enough, but the level of degeneracy whores have reached in shere numbers has never happened in history before, and can only possibly be compared to theoretical depictions of Soddom of Gomorrah by Antelluvian Advanced Civilization conspiracy theorists.

If you combine enforced monogamy with counter brainwashing facilities where you send these women to be made traditional, possibly even forget their slutty past entirely with advanced technology/brainwashing techniques, its a much better solution that leads to a much happier society, than lmao just make raping whores legal. Rape is degenerate because its not monogamous, and basically on the level of child abuse, because women are literally that retarded.

You really haven't tho.

Baseless claim, and a low IQ cope. Virgin marriages report the highest happiness rates, sex lives, and the list goes on and on and on.

Women have the mental capacity of a child, we were focusing on Sharia law specifically, so a religion with laws that basically justify child abuse on women who are basically drugged out on estrogen, brainwashing, and less synapses in the brain isn't really a good thing, when there's much better ways to handle said situations as I listed above.
High IQ
 
Last edited:
Seriously, the lawcucklodry is getting out of hand.
Give me specific, logical reasons as to why:

1) grown men being sexual with teenage women is a bad thing
2) redistribution of the vagina (as a form of capital) is a bad thing
3) revenge and retaliation against normans is a bad thing
4) the rape of promiscuous women is a bad thing
5) the practice of white shariah law is a bad thing


Low IQ post. Low IQ thread.

1. Teenage women as in the ages of 18 & 19? Nothing wrong with it. Under that age just plain pathetic & weak. You're not a child.
2. Redistribution of the vagina are for Communist cunts. If you want to be a Communist cunt than take ownership of that fact. Good luck scissoring.
3. Revenge & retaliation against "Normans"? They've been extinct for 1 millennium. They're called French people I believe. If you mean Normies than try your luck Walter Kitty.
4. Rape of promiscuous women. Well define promiscuous & then try & apply that to any Foid you see. Are you an Islamincel?
5. Are you an Islamincel?

My point to you. Are you LARPING SONNY JIM??? 450 posts in 3-4 days.
 
Last edited:
Seriously, the lawcucklodry is getting out of hand.
Give me specific, logical reasons as to why:

1) grown men being sexual with teenage women is a bad thing
2) redistribution of the vagina (as a form of capital) is a bad thing
3) revenge and retaliation against normans is a bad thing
4) the rape of promiscuous women is a bad thing
5) the practice of white shariah law is a bad thing
Point 1, 2, and 4 are all common doctrines that have been standard to every society for thousands of years, they are all morally justified as well.
 
I have a feeling that OP is blackpill101 again. Damn boyo.
 
If it bleeds it breeds, no one can tell me that I can't have sex with a foid just because she is 18 on a paper, that's just a number.
 
I would love to see that debate.
 
Low IQ post. Low IQ thread.

1. Teenage women as in the ages of 18 & 19? Nothing wrong with it. Under that age just plain pathetic & weak. You're not a child.

Why? Why is it pathetic and weak? What makes 18 year old women different from women under that age level? Both have child like mentalities, make irresponsible decisions, are promiscuous (although 18+ might be even more promiscuous), are grown women physically, etc.

2. Redistribution of the vagina are for Communist cunts. If you want to be a Communist cunt than take ownership of that fact. Good luck scissoring.

Marxism rodgerism is way different than communism, faggot. Communism basically wants redistribution of income and property that is worked upon to achieve. The vagina is simply achieved by how you look, only if you believe in PUA nonsense. Sexual redistribution isn’t based on “muh opportunity of outcome.”

3. Revenge & retaliation against "Normans"? They've been extinct for 1 millennium. They're called French people I believe. If you mean Normies than try your luck Walter Kitty.

Normans are normies.
4. Rape of promiscuous women. Well define promiscuous & then try & apply that to any Foid you see. Are you an Islamincel?

Promiscuous women = women who whore around and fuck as many men as possible.

5. Are you an Islamincel?

Nope. White shariah isn’t the same as Islamic shariah.

My point to you. Are you LARPING SONNY JIM??? 450 posts in 3-4 days.
Point 1, 2, and 4 are all common doctrines that have been standard to every society for thousands of years, they are all morally justified as well.
What? Actually point 1 has just been changed during the 1900s when feminists supported inflating the value of the used up vagina, and supported education for teen foods.
Everyone is immoral when they rely entirely on natural instincts, and hypergamy is an evolutionary trait designed for savage times to breed more war ready men. Hypergamy does not exist in traditional societies or households at least not to as an extreme degree because biologically speaking a patriarchy to enforce monogamy, during childhood, and in society creates an evolutionary awareness that hypergamy is not necessary. There is no need to breed for war. The breakdown of society to encourage hypergamy is a Marxist construct designed to destroy society and make it more savage.

There is a difference between immoral women and men based on nature. Women based on nature are hypergamous and tend to leave the majority of men whom they don’t desire to be sexless. Men based on nature are aggressive, masculine, dominating. I agree that hypergamy has been inflated by society; that’s why marxism rodgerism exists: to get rid of that fact.

There is a reason why I can't get a girlfriend where I live in L.A, a leftist marxist hellhole, but if I go to Montana or various other rural states for example I could find a looksmatch/statusmatch really easily, because their culture does not favor hypergamy. Thus is the plight of a being a locationcel, I guess you wouldn't understand since you're a mentalcel clearly.

In marxism rodgerism you are guaranteed a sexually active wife no matter where you live... even in places where hypergamy isn’t as rampant as you said, the woman will still want chad and won’t be attracted to you.

Extreme cope, already proven false several times
aswell.

from what I know you haven’t proved it wrong at all

Used up foids are for the most part only a problem because of the mental damage caused to them by whoring around. Easily fixed via brainwashing.

But what about the rotten roast beef? Men want a girl who’s pure and special, instinctively. A “re educated” used up foid will still be scientifically and physically used up.

Its more degenerate for Old men to steal women from young males. Females give boys the motivation to become men, this is the problem many young boys face. In the past as society was getting more and more traditional, especially in late stage traditionalism before Marxism destroyed everything, you'd have these young boys getting together with their highschool sweethearts and being motivated to get jobs and be successful, have a family by 25, etc etc, and with proper parents and culture they'll be on the right track and making good decisions at a very young age anyways.

You’re talking about enforced monogamy but do you realize that old men used to marry teen foids all the time in enforced monogamous periods? Boys didn’t have sex during high school. Girls didn’t even go to high school. If you wanna use 1950s America as an example of enforced monogamy then give up. It’s not.

Saying betabuxxing still doesn't prove shit and is still a cope. So is pretending the woman wont like or fuck you despite all the data to the contrary and hundreds of years of history of that aswell. Dead bedrooms only happen because cucks marry used up whores who expect too much from their beta male husbands because they always have it in the back of their mind they deserve a rich chad prince charming because they fucked them once. This is something that simply does not happen in trad virgin marriages.

You’re talking about hundreds years of history?
Men barely had sexual relationships with their wives unless the ones that wanted a lot of kids. In Marxism rodgerism you both get to use your virgin young wife as a sexual toy and a breeding machine.


I'm not arguing for arranged marriages brainlet, in a traditional society with enforced monogamy people would be looksmatched and statusmatched. If you're not a chad you shouldn't expect a stacy. You should expect someone who looks and is worth just as much as you are.

So basically 1950s America? Women will still act on their hypergamous instincts and still “pick and choose” the men they want. Fuck off with that. Maybe they won’t be as hypergamous as modern women, but the hypergamy will still be there.

Again, you have to ignore all data, and cope to believe this. Already went over this.

Men are bluepilled into thinking they’re having happy marriages.

Anything more than 3 children is generally pretty unstable for the child and general raising capabilities of the parents to gurantee their children turn out well.

Leftist, postmodernist lie.

Back to this bullshit cope. Fact is buddy, only cucks who marry non virgins have dull sex lives. Virgin Married Couples are fucking till they're old.

So basically you want to marry a virgin who’s used up and 25+??? Because that’s what happened during the 1950s American period? ROFL. And men were bluepilled into thinking they were having great sex lives- maybe fucking once per month or something LoL

No, because in a traditional marriage nobody is getting hurt during sex. It doesn't matter if she has the mind of a child if you're not doing any harm to society and you're both enjoying yourself. The abuse comes from manipulation, pumping and dumping, rape, physical abuse, etc. This is ACTUAL real abuse that is highly immoral considering their mental inferiority.

Why will rape hurt a used up femoid who’s already gotten used to being pumped and dumped by most men, and is enjoying it too? Doesn’t make sense. If anything it’s a sub8 punishment for these foids.

We went over this already aswell, the main problem is her mental state from fucking all those men, not the fact that she's fucked all those men. The reason why men get so worked up about women having multiple partners, at least the ones who aren't cucked, is because its a biological natural response against an unstable and unloyal partner basically. If she doesn't even know she's fucked 100 men, if she's been brainwashed to be that conservative trad woman, it doesn't fucking matter. What she doesn't know she doesn't need to know, and the man doesn't need to know either because all the negative effects from those multiple partners wont exist anymore, and we went over the rape thing already aswell.

But you’re ignoring the physical, rotten roast beef, effects. Scientifically she’s still fuckin used up and I wouldn’t wanna fuck her.

You clearly haven't read the studies fully, here's another one tho, got more aswell, feel free to ask for anything specifically aswell. There's a reason why they're not getting divorced and reporting happiness. Women are happy when their husbands are happy. Their Husbands are happy because they're having sex and enjoying eachothers company and actually love eachother. You can cope and pretend they brainwashed themselves into being happy all you want, all the data is against you. Get fucked.
https://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2012-10/afps-dtl101712.php

Again men are bluepilled Into that constitutes a happy sex life. Maybe they think that having sexual once a month with their 25* virgin foids is “good.”

All evidence and data points to the fact that Children need a good biological father AND mother to turn out correctly. There are things only mothers can offer children than a father can't, that's just a fact, and vice versa. Children end up fucked up in single parent households, and in households where a parent is distant, usually more common with fathers, but it happens with mothers aswell.

You think under marxism rodgerism they won’t get that? The grown men who are fucking the JBs will make many kids, and they will be raised well by both the female and male counterparts. However once they reach a certain age, they will become independent, and the female ones will slowly (after some years) become sexual slaves for breeding under the property of another male.

Strawman, just because a female is more childlike and mentally inferior, doesn't mean she doesn't have a purpose. Everything is about duality. Stability requires pairs of two. This is just nature. A woman mentally matures in different ways than a man, for different purposes.

What purpose are you talking about? Raising kids? Being a mother? These are fulfilled under Marxism rodgerism.

The roastie meme is just a meme created to trigger and fuck with and shame whores. I wouldn't go for a woman if I knew she was used up, but the whole point of this program is to make her believe she isn't and in fact convince and brainwash her into being a traditional woman believes she's a virgin, and if she believes it/the brainwashing was successful, the positive effects would transfer to her partner.

It’s not a meme lmao. Why would you want to have sex with a woman, even if she has been “re educated,” knowing that hundreds of men stuck their dicks in her? I’m talking about the physical aspect. She will still be used up, not prime, not special.

My solution, is the only solution. Better than your Low IQ cucktears bait.

Cope. My solution is the only real solution. Your solution is betabux 2.0. And you’re even justifying 1950s as “enforced monogamy.” Fuck off out of here.

The only thing you've shown is your extreme lack of understanding of how the world actually works.

You are a clueless fag and cuck trying to justify betabuxxing a used up rotten beef pussy if she underwent “brainwashing” techniques.
 
Last edited:
Women have the brain of a Child, what's rape going to solve? Should it be okay to rape a promiscuous orphan prostituting themselves on the streets and sleeping with adults out of their own volition?

Such a girl doesn't belong on the street, she belongs in a brothel. There, she would be protected from rape or exploitation by the pimp who owns the brothel. As long as she works there, she remains his property. If she doesn't like the pimp or if he is abusive, she can run away and go work in another brothel. Women, like children, should never be allowed to be independent social actors. Because there will always be some women who chose to become whores, it's absolutely necessary for a moral society to stigmatize them and to avoid treating them as the equals of virgins and married women.

There should be no laws protecting disreputable women from rape. Why not? First of all, their lifestyle is harmful to the social fabric. Secondly, more than 80% of rape accusations are false. Women, like children, are extremely unreliable and dishonest. It's probably more traumatizing for a man to be falsely accused of rape than it is traumatizing for a slut to be raped.

7qpeb7v45qd11


Women have proven themselves to be unworthy of the very laws that were enacted to protect them. If a slut accuses a man of rape and no witnesses were present, how do you know if she is telling the truth? A man who rapes a virgin or another man's faithful spouse deserves to die a painful death, but a man who rapes a slut shouldn't be considered to be criminal.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

stranger
Replies
15
Views
370
Skoga
Skoga
T
Replies
8
Views
421
NocturnalCel
NocturnalCel
ZaynShahar
Replies
3
Views
209
Dehumanized
D
CEO of Simps
Replies
19
Views
418
Adolf Kitler
Adolf Kitler
AsiaCel
Replies
13
Views
437
Animecel2D
Animecel2D

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top