Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Serious I wish my mom was a hypergamous foid

DISASTER

DISASTER

FUCK THIS SHIT, God of GlassesCels
★★★★★
Joined
May 6, 2026
Posts
3,424
Online time
7d 5h
Atleast there will be a chance i wouldnt end up in this situation.
 
My mum was and married chad. But of course, we inherit more of our mothers phenotypical genetics :feelsbadman:
 
My mum was and married chad. But of course, we inherit more of our mothers phenotypical genetics :feelsbadman:
Brutal life, so even a chad dad wouldnt save me ?
 
My mum was and married chad. But of course, we inherit more of our mothers phenotypical genetics :feelsbadman:
Same, my dad is a tallfag MTN-HTN and I am sub4 thanks to my mom trash genes.
 
My mum was and married chad. But of course, we inherit more of our mothers phenotypical genetics :feelsbadman:
subhuman mothers create most autists and sub5s. its not like their male counterparts can reproduce anyways.
 
Hypergamous toilets are creating truecels for centuries.
 
Same, my dad is a tallfag MTN-HTN and I am sub4 thanks to my mom trash genes.
Brutal shit, my dad is subhuman im subhuman, my mom is the good looking but she is short, like 155 cm
 
Hypergamous toilets are creating truecels for centuries.
If males were the hypergamous ones, we would be better looking - as only the more attractive females would be reproducing. So therefore more attractive offspring.

In nature, men prefer quantity, whilst women prefer quality. Men are also naturally more sexually aroused more often. So when these women start taking advantage of this and get BOTH quantity and quality, they mess everything up and we all start looking uglier.
 
If males were the hypergamous ones, we would be better looking - as only the more attractive females would be reproducing. So therefore more attractive offspring.

In nature, men prefer quantity, whilst women prefer quality. Men are also naturally more sexually aroused more often. So when these women start taking advantage of this and get BOTH quantity and quality, they mess everything up and we all start looking uglier.
:feelsbadman:
 
If males were the hypergamous ones, we would be better looking - as only the more attractive females would be reproducing. So therefore more attractive offspring.

In nature, men prefer quantity, whilst women prefer quality. Men are also naturally more sexually aroused more often. So when these women start taking advantage of this and get BOTH quantity and quality, they mess everything up and we all start looking uglier.
This makes sense but dont you think that females will get uglier, with more bone mass and musciline features, and we would end up in the same place
 
This makes sense but dont you think that females will get uglier, with more bone mass and musciline features, and we would end up in the same place
What do you mean by this?

That if females with more masculine features reproduce, then more attractive offspring will arise?
I'd say if they had greater bone mass then yes, but masculine features not really - it depends on the gender of the offspring too (I think).
Bone mass ≠ masculine features

I have a great example here:
1781608369212

You can see that the mothers bones are more prominent with more mass, whilst still feminine.
Whilst she has the more prominent features too - but also still feminine.

This is a clearer picture:
1781608489863
 

Similar threads

Takuji Mamiya
Replies
24
Views
808
AutismKing
AutismKing
D. B. Gooner
Replies
20
Views
795
Matrix0_
Matrix0_
moorf
Replies
9
Views
708
orthodox
orthodox
subhumanmonkey
Replies
12
Views
336
Alexander400
Alexander400
grimlockcel
Replies
15
Views
610
Reddit=Bandwagonism
Reddit=Bandwagonism

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top