Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum
Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.
Would enforcing foids to marry incels really work? Wouldnt that be miserable? Just like communism it is a utopia and hard to achieve thats maybe why communist revolutions stopped after 1991. I also think this ideology is a MEME since it was written by a currycel from incels.is, there is no manifesto or political party for this ideology. Does any pro marxist rodgerist want to explain why it would work?
Afghanistan is working under the Taliban, although it has been occupied by the United States for 20 years and the local population has been brainwashed. Yes, some of the collaborators escaped, but the state itself successfully exists.
Marxists learned 100 years ago that the "international revolution" doesn't work. You have to take over a single country and then close your borders like all real commie states did.
North Korea is not in danger of disappearing, due to the extremely low birth rate, unlike the South. Any totalitarianism is more successful in the long run, whether it is religious or communist.
North Korea is not in danger of disappearing, due to the extremely low birth rate, unlike the South. Any totalitarianism is more successful in the long run, whether it is religious or communist.
Totalitarianism provides more tools to solve problems: to close borders and not let anyone in and not let anyone out, to force women to give birth, to force them to marry an average man on pain of punishment in the form of ridicule or sending to prison for hard labor - the solution to all problems.
How does a government like this even achieve power in the first place? Nobody would vote for it since most people don't think inceldom is a problem, including most incels since most incels are incels in denial. An incel revolution is obviously an unrealistic empowerment fantasy cope.
I feel like you need a wider framework than "dude, what if everyone had a state mandated gf so inceldom stopped being a problem" to run a proper society.
It will fail for the same reason communism failed, it is a too idealistic way of thinking, and you will run into many issues such as women not wanting to be with certain partners, men not wanting to be with certain partners(let's be honest, if we grew up under a roderist-marxist system most of us would probably be inflating our SMV and would demand a better partner), people's parents, friends, relatives, not wanting them to be with certain partners. What happens when people resist and who exactly calls the shots on who is with who and works out the logistics of everything? I feel like you are going to constantly be trying to fit a square peg in a round hole like this.
I think it's best to have a totalitarian system that imposes soft power on foids to get married, and stay married, and to punish things like infidelity and prostitution very harshly (jail time or even death) That seems more realistic than sexual communism.
communism is achievable if you first social engineer a new man who can accept communism and would not feel the need for example to own anything for himself. commies realized it and switched from a terrorist revolution to a revolution that should first happen in human mind.
How does a government like this even achieve power in the first place? Nobody would vote for it since most people don't think inceldom is a problem, including most incels since most incels are incels in denial. An incel revolution is obviously an unrealistic empowerment fantasy cope.
I feel like you need a wider framework than "dude, what if everyone had a state mandated gf so inceldom stopped being a problem" to run a proper society.
It will fail for the same reason communism failed, it is a too idealistic way of thinking, and you will run into many issues such as women not wanting to be with certain partners, men not wanting to be with certain partners(let's be honest, if we grew up under a roderist-marxist system most of us would probably be inflating our SMV and would demand a better partner), people's parents, friends, relatives, not wanting them to be with certain partners. What happens when people resist and who exactly calls the shots on who is with who and works out the logistics of everything? I feel like you are going to constantly be trying to fit a square peg in a round hole like this.
I think it's best to have a totalitarian system that imposes soft power on foids to get married, and stay married, and to punish things like infidelity and prostitution very harshly (jail time or even death) That seems more realistic than sexual communism.
Maybe. Prolatarians dont accept communism now but they did before. But no one knows about the blackpill yet so the closeted incels will accept it and the ideology might spread fast.
Marriage is a vulvois convention and has no place in a Marxist-Rodgerist foidless society.
The cunt-capitalist system all civilizations were built upon is based on private ownership of the means of reproduction, that is: various forms of marriage between man and foid, resulting in families etc.
Marxism-Rodgerism is based on COLLECTIVE ownership of the means of reproduction, that is, wombs (natural or artificial).
In a foidless society, all foids are kept in a coma locked inside breeding facilities where no man enters. They are tended by robot nurses and repeatedly impregnated through artificial insemination until their reproductive usefulness is spent, then the foid is recycled into dog food.
Sex is illegal. All males have robot-waifus with artificial intelligence assigned to them at puberty for companionship, sex, education, health monitoring etc. Once a male is an adult, stabilized, gainfully employed etc., he will have the option to raise his own offspring made from his sperm and donor eggs from a gigastacy, genetically screened for defects and incubated in the womb of some foid no one has ever seen and his dog will probably eat some of later.
There is no marriage, girlfriend, sex etc. as this is a foidless society and inceldom is enforced for all males by the revolutionary I.N.C.E.L. antisexhaver terror squad (A.S.H.T.S.). The sexual and affective needs are taken care of by robot-waifus with AI.
Marxism-Rodgerism is a revision of original Marxian works, much like Leninism, Maoism, Juche, etc. and as such it builds and improves the original theory.
Marx and Engels correcly pointed out many things, but left out many details also.
For instance, the private ownership of the means of production being the foundation of capitalist exploitation of non-owners of such means.
What Marx left out (but Engels did almost touch upon) is that private ownership of the means of REPRODUCTION is an even deeper, and most insidious mechanism of exploitation of man.
For clarification, the capitalist system does indeed exploit the worker who maintains everything running, but FOIDS, who own the means of reproduction are the ultimate beneficiaries of it. The proletarian who breaks his back working can avail himself of almost none of his gains, as his wife will demand and command however he spends his meagre take-home earnings.
The exploitation that foids inflict on betabuxxers is in the order of 90% or more. Think, do you know a worker who can breed and yet freely disposes of more than 10% of his take-home pay?
Even the bourgeois factory owner is doing business 80+ hours a week, he can't leisurely dispose of his own wealth, as his wife does that for him.
The busy bureaucrat, soldier, politician etc. likewise may present themselves as lions in the workplace, but they are mere cash-cows for the foids that exploit them.
A Marxist-Rodgerist does not seek to abolish private ownership of the means of production anymore than Marxists sought to abolish private ownership of toothbrushes and clothes. What a Marxist-Rodgerist sees as the greatest injustice and mechanism of exploitation in society is the private ownership, by foids, of the MEANS OF REPRODUCTION.
As such, the entire conspiracy of the bourgeois factory-owning class against the proletarian is of as little consequence as the coin-collectors conspiracy to deprive the local shops of spare change.
The great injustice and exploitation system that ought to be dismantled is the cunt-capitalism.
North Korea is not in danger of disappearing, due to the extremely low birth rate, unlike the South. Any totalitarianism is more successful in the long run, whether it is religious or communist.
Marxism-Rodgerism is a revision of original Marxian works, much like Leninism, Maoism, Juche, etc. and as such it builds and improves the original theory.
Marx and Engels correcly pointed out many things, but left out many details also.
For instance, the private ownership of the means of production being the foundation of capitalist exploitation of non-owners of such means.
What Marx left out (but Engels did almost touch upon) is that private ownership of the means of REPRODUCTION is an even deeper, and most insidious mechanism of exploitation of man.
For clarification, the capitalist system does indeed exploit the worker who maintains everything running, but FOIDS, who own the means of reproduction are the ultimate beneficiaries of it. The proletarian who breaks his back working can avail himself of almost none of his gains, as his wife will demand and command however he spends his meagre take-home earnings.
The exploitation that foids inflict on betabuxxers is in the order of 90% or more. Think, do you know a worker who can breed and yet freely disposes of more than 10% of his take-home pay?
Even the bourgeois factory owner is doing business 80+ hours a week, he can't leisurely dispose of his own wealth, as his wife does that for him.
The busy bureaucrat, soldier, politician etc. likewise may present themselves as lions in the workplace, but they are mere cash-cows for the foids that exploit them.
A Marxist-Rodgerist does not seek to abolish private ownership of the means of production anymore than Marxists sought to abolish private ownership of toothbrushes and clothes. What a Marxist-Rodgerist sees as the greatest injustice and mechanism of exploitation in society is the private ownership, by foids, of the MEANS OF REPRODUCTION.
As such, the entire conspiracy of the bourgeois factory-owning class against the proletarian is of as little consequence as the coin-collectors conspiracy to deprive the local shops of spare change.
The great injustice and exploitation system that ought to be dismantled is the cunt-capitalism.
Marxism-Rodgerism is a revision of original Marxian works, much like Leninism, Maoism, Juche, etc. and as such it builds and improves the original theory.
Marx and Engels correcly pointed out many things, but left out many details also.
For instance, the private ownership of the means of production being the foundation of capitalist exploitation of non-owners of such means.
What Marx left out (but Engels did almost touch upon) is that private ownership of the means of REPRODUCTION is an even deeper, and most insidious mechanism of exploitation of man.
For clarification, the capitalist system does indeed exploit the worker who maintains everything running, but FOIDS, who own the means of reproduction are the ultimate beneficiaries of it. The proletarian who breaks his back working can avail himself of almost none of his gains, as his wife will demand and command however he spends his meagre take-home earnings.
The exploitation that foids inflict on betabuxxers is in the order of 90% or more. Think, do you know a worker who can breed and yet freely disposes of more than 10% of his take-home pay?
Even the bourgeois factory owner is doing business 80+ hours a week, he can't leisurely dispose of his own wealth, as his wife does that for him.
The busy bureaucrat, soldier, politician etc. likewise may present themselves as lions in the workplace, but they are mere cash-cows for the foids that exploit them.
A Marxist-Rodgerist does not seek to abolish private ownership of the means of production anymore than Marxists sought to abolish private ownership of toothbrushes and clothes. What a Marxist-Rodgerist sees as the greatest injustice and mechanism of exploitation in society is the private ownership, by foids, of the MEANS OF REPRODUCTION.
As such, the entire conspiracy of the bourgeois factory-owning class against the proletarian is of as little consequence as the coin-collectors conspiracy to deprive the local shops of spare change.
The great injustice and exploitation system that ought to be dismantled is the cunt-capitalism.
I believe this ideology can end our inceldom and it would be easy to spread the blackpill teachings to the 60% of men in the world. It would create an international revolution of equal rights to the men in the feminist soyciety
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
