There's something even more helpless in my opinion when someone calls you a 'loser.' If someone calls you a 'loser' I assume that's because they are a winner and are so used to winning, they don't want to be tainted by dealing with people who lose. It's absolutely anxiety inducing to be near someone that uncomfortable with low status-- which is why women would be a pain to deal with even if you can fuck.
It assumes that there is something tragic about not winning, even though that makes no sense at all because it's rather rare to always win. But at the same time being called a 'loser' always feels accurate, because most of the time people do lose. There's not much you can do to not be a loser, other than be extremely competent, so there's this feeling that winning is something you have control over, though in reality, it's very rare to win in an environment of extreme competition.
Also 'loser' carries a lot more weight to it. 'Incel' lost it's meaning as leftists use it to describe any male they personally dislike. But 'loser' always meant a person that should be mocked because they are so incompetent. In fact, I think being called a 'loser' is more sociologically accurate than 'incel' to describe men like us. And I can't see the SJWs ever start adopting 'loser' into their banned word list, because 'loser' is too broad a group to protect -- though the reality is, the word pretty much only describes low SMV men. I've pretty much never heard a woman call another woman a 'loser.' Only our enemies use that term in fact, whether that be normies, venal women, or Chaddish redpillers-- they all tend to gravitate toward 'loser' to describe us, whereas only delusional leftists who are in fact losers use 'incel.' This article ( written by a fellow loser) explains why perfectly:
View: https://dsg1976.medium.com/why-everyone-needs-to-stop-using-the-word-loser-f6cdc5480285
what is the more insulting term, 'incel' or 'loser?'
It assumes that there is something tragic about not winning, even though that makes no sense at all because it's rather rare to always win. But at the same time being called a 'loser' always feels accurate, because most of the time people do lose. There's not much you can do to not be a loser, other than be extremely competent, so there's this feeling that winning is something you have control over, though in reality, it's very rare to win in an environment of extreme competition.
Also 'loser' carries a lot more weight to it. 'Incel' lost it's meaning as leftists use it to describe any male they personally dislike. But 'loser' always meant a person that should be mocked because they are so incompetent. In fact, I think being called a 'loser' is more sociologically accurate than 'incel' to describe men like us. And I can't see the SJWs ever start adopting 'loser' into their banned word list, because 'loser' is too broad a group to protect -- though the reality is, the word pretty much only describes low SMV men. I've pretty much never heard a woman call another woman a 'loser.' Only our enemies use that term in fact, whether that be normies, venal women, or Chaddish redpillers-- they all tend to gravitate toward 'loser' to describe us, whereas only delusional leftists who are in fact losers use 'incel.' This article ( written by a fellow loser) explains why perfectly:
View: https://dsg1976.medium.com/why-everyone-needs-to-stop-using-the-word-loser-f6cdc5480285
what is the more insulting term, 'incel' or 'loser?'
Last edited:
