The entire argument that some race is more attractive or aesthetic is because of history, it's completely schizophrenic and hypocritical. Why would (some) whites be attractive because of history but thugmaxxed Tyrones are still attractive regardless of their slavery history? There are some small historical time frames where some nation conquered another and took their women but that doesn't have an impact over generations. Germans took over France and French foids got pregnant and paired up with German soldiers? Yes. Do French women in modern day want to get pregnant for German men over French men? No. Do modern French foids lust over German soldiers now? No.
It's mostly a new world thing to categorize people by skin colour instead of phenotypes and ethnicity. There is no "white people" in Europe. Polish and French men do not identify with each other despite both sharing a white skin colour. It's more convenient to identify by skin colour in the new world, in the cloaca gentium.
There are white phenotypes that are not so attractive. Baltid phenotypes (Slavic and Finno-Ugric) are not anywhere nearly as attractive as Germanic and Anglo-Saxon phenotypes.
I'm tired of seeing people claim attraction is political and cultural when it's not. Foids are loyal to the strongest branch regardless of values, history, culture, whatever. Right now the strongest branch is the most aesthetic one.
