Bluepillers say this constantly but as usual they don't have a nuanced view of reality.
1. A man and a woman of adult age walking next to eachother or sitting at a coffee shop or whatever does not automatically make them a couple. They could be colleauges, friends, siblings, cousins etc.
So already that is an unreliable observation. You cannot walk around making claims based on incomplete or misunderstood data. That is like an ecologist walking through a forest looking for an endangered speices of squirrel, seeing squirrels everywhere, reporting the numbers back, when in reality, he was observing a different species of squirrel that isn't actually endangered. His report is wrong because he misread the situation.
2. In the event that they actually see a couple, holding hands or kissing, they're going to be biased against the man 100% of the time, add the fact that she's caked with make up, they might say that she's a 7 and he's a 4, when it's actually more like two 5s. This is especially clear when considering that people who make this claim are almost always misandrist who would never admit that the man is more attractive, or even equally as attractive as the woman, because women are of course always 10s.
3. The very fact that they've noticed these couples speak to how uncommon they are. If you spend your day in town you might see 300 couples and not notice 297 of them, but the 3 couples where the girl is pretty and the guy is ugly is seared into your mind and when you think about couples in general, that is reinforced as a common occurence. Kind of like walking through a field of white tulips and seeing some red ones, the red ones are the ones you remember.
4. If the guy is indeed ugly the girl is hot, then we know that it is not as the bluepillers would have us believe, that he has a good Purrsonality, he is most likely rich and she is most likely post wall and a Chad widow.
So no, these people are not going to convince anyone that the world is full of ugly guys dating bombshells because of their hecking Purrsonality, it's based on bias, misjudgement and lies.
1. A man and a woman of adult age walking next to eachother or sitting at a coffee shop or whatever does not automatically make them a couple. They could be colleauges, friends, siblings, cousins etc.
So already that is an unreliable observation. You cannot walk around making claims based on incomplete or misunderstood data. That is like an ecologist walking through a forest looking for an endangered speices of squirrel, seeing squirrels everywhere, reporting the numbers back, when in reality, he was observing a different species of squirrel that isn't actually endangered. His report is wrong because he misread the situation.
2. In the event that they actually see a couple, holding hands or kissing, they're going to be biased against the man 100% of the time, add the fact that she's caked with make up, they might say that she's a 7 and he's a 4, when it's actually more like two 5s. This is especially clear when considering that people who make this claim are almost always misandrist who would never admit that the man is more attractive, or even equally as attractive as the woman, because women are of course always 10s.
3. The very fact that they've noticed these couples speak to how uncommon they are. If you spend your day in town you might see 300 couples and not notice 297 of them, but the 3 couples where the girl is pretty and the guy is ugly is seared into your mind and when you think about couples in general, that is reinforced as a common occurence. Kind of like walking through a field of white tulips and seeing some red ones, the red ones are the ones you remember.
4. If the guy is indeed ugly the girl is hot, then we know that it is not as the bluepillers would have us believe, that he has a good Purrsonality, he is most likely rich and she is most likely post wall and a Chad widow.
So no, these people are not going to convince anyone that the world is full of ugly guys dating bombshells because of their hecking Purrsonality, it's based on bias, misjudgement and lies.
