View attachment 1446369
Yet another delusional whore with an overinflated ego and overweening vanity; I am honestly sick and tired of these despicable creatures and their braindead takes. It is truly absurd that anyone thought there was any sense in granting them rights and the ability to openly express their nonsensical takes.
She literally said 100 to 1. According to her, attractive men are mythical creatures, whereas attractive women are everywhere. This aligns with the idea women consider the vast majority of men as subhuman, and only a small minority are seen as average, let alone attractive:
View attachment 1446348
You can't make this up. When rating male faces, women cluster most of their ratings at the bottom end of the scale. That’s not “preference” — that’s rejection of the average man as a baseline.
Meanwhile, look at the male ratings of female faces: it’s a bell curve. Men are way more realistic. We see beauty across a spectrum. But women? It’s either Chad or subhuman.
Aside from the clear bias in how attractiveness is rated without any enhancements to looks, there are other factors to consider, such as makeup, which could further inflate their looks and reinforce the idea that there are far more attractive women.
And let's not forget the absolute irony here: This foid has layers of makeup on her face and is, at best, average. She sees herself as a beautiful goddess, yet considers her looksmatch a lowly, worthless creature unworthy of her time. What a fucking joke
