L
So we get a lot of content here from threads created by IT users, but did anyone ever notice how much of a logical self-own their sidebar statement itself is? If you are low IQ, as quite a lot of IT users are ( The other part being deliberately obtuse gaslighters ), then you probably won't see it straight away. You will certainly disagree with it as an incel, but miss the axiomatically illogical nature of it.
They say, in a haughty and loaded manner, that incels ( BAD!! ) can be distinguished from regular virgins and the romantically unsuccessful ( Our good lapdogs who keep their motuh shut. Except when they were caught red-handed insulting them too or indirectly implying that lifelong, non-abstinent virgins are inherently shitty people ) by how we 'blame women, our genes, attractive men, and society at large' for the inability to get dates and sex. Whereas the proper mindset, of course, would be to zip our mouths at any wrongthink involving placing responsibility for generally shitty behaviors or bad attitudes on the other gender ( Only women on TrollX are allowed to do daily while addressing men in general ), nor find any flaws in normie society ( Only normies are allowed to do that about subjects near and dear to them ), but of course, instead - to blame "OURSELVES!!!!!"
But there's one problem. Aside from all the obvious problems concerning mountains of empirical evidence to the contrary, that is. Because women and their helpers are incapable of critical thinking, are not versed in philosophy, or rhetoric, and are unable to debate anything to save their lives ( Which is why all the incel debate subs got banned and IT women just ignore you if you ask them to rationally justify their positions ), they fail to understand that they are in fact scolding incels for the very thing they demand of them.
Confused? Let me explain: The word 'blame', despite the amorphous connotations of 'negativity' it conjures in normie minds, is by its technical definition and its practical manifestation in physical reality simply an attribution of cause to a witnessed effect. 'To blame' someone is to 'put at fault', and 'fault' is the state of having a perceived characteristic that influenced a certain outcome in a manner unfavorable to the observer. IncelTear dogma follows that this characteristic ( Which all incels are apparently born with, which is how they can somehow have a shitty personality for being evil incels yet also becoming evil incels to begin with due to a shitty personality ) is 'Personality', and that it is the sole existing characteristic responsible for the unfavorable outcome of not getting dates and sex.
Let us pretend for a moment that we wanted to agree with them. But instead of leaving it at that like a brainless IT gaslighter, we wanted to ask ourselves what was the cause of our horrible personalities, that seem to afflict us but spared from the upstanding folk of IT? Ironically, we would not be able to blame our personalities without also blaming what IT denounces in a mocking tone - our genes, women, attractive men who are distinct from us, and society at large. Every single psychology, biology or sociology lesson 101 would inform you that humans are the product of two things - genes and environment, nature and nurture. Only religious doctrine ( And IT users don't strike me as the religious type ) argues otherwise, that humans are in fact independent of the laws of physics and are just vessels of unspecified forces from magic land like the 'souls' and 'wills' and 'spirits', and even those beliefs are separated by law from any actual academic study of human psychology and biology, which only lists environment and genetics, you know, stuff with empirical evidence behind it.
Our personalities could only develop from the interplay between our genes and the way society raised us, treated us, how people interacted with us, and thus in order to put "URSELF!!!!!! UR PURSONALITY!!!" at fault, you actually must by extension also put genes, society, women and men around you, etc, at fault for the outcome of how it turned out. Furthermore, women are by default at fault for the outcome of us not getting dates and sex, which from our perspective is unfavorable. Even 'not accepting horrible personalities' ( Which women totally never do ) is an attribute which contributed to this outcome - It's just that normies don't know the definition of 'blame', they think it's some kind of ethical judgement. For women, not having sex with us is a favorable outcome, so obviously they have no faults to find with their own selection criterions. While for us, women are automatically, functionally at fault for the outcome in question, I.E rejecting sex. Again, 80IQ normies want to say "UR BAD! WOMEN GOOD!!" while misusing the term 'blame' in doing so.
So basically, the IncelTear sidebar itself is a giant contradiction.
