I am not a Cumskin White Aryan. I am a Indo Aryan mixed with some Dravidian and Assyrian and I don't support any white supremacy but maybe there is a reason that Caucasoid people have been so dominant over these many years.
First we need to understand the difference between Phenotype and Genotype to debunk some counter arguments. Phenotype are all the external factors you have that can be seen and genotype is the real gene. So in context of India, many people say that how can Indo aryans be superior when the native african looking Indians have are much more simliar to them genologically than they are to European aryans.
But thing is that genology mostly doesn't matter. Indo europeans in India are mixed with many other native tribes and this is the reason their geneology got similiar. But their Phenotypes are pretty much very different eventhough you can see the mix.
Native indians of India look like Africans because it was first the Africans who migrated to India. Since both India and AFrica have similiar hot, wet climates, their phenotype didn't require any change eventhough their genotype went through a massive change due to mutation. Phenotypes are the real things that matter as it has external effects, your inner genes doesn't mean anything. So the argument that Europeans are more closer to north africans than to other europeans etc is very dumb.
Now phenotype is mostly determined through Climatic conditions under which a species evolves in. Normally it is found that Animals who live in Colder climates have much bigger bodies, physical strenghts and even Higher intillegence due to harsh conditions. Normally these animals are much bigger and stronger than their Warmer climate counterparts for example compare a Polar bear or a Siberian tiger to a Black bear or the Bengal tiger but they can't go into warmer climates since they will just die there. When Homo Sapiens first migrated to Europe they probably barely survived and mixed with a lot of neandratals acquiring their dna. Slowly they evolved into tougher humans with Higher iqs. However normally as nature states they couldn't go into warmer climates and just invade there.
But as Agriculture started to form in Middle east and many anatolian farmers also started agriculture. They brought agriculture to Europe. Now they didn't have to hunt for food, they could do other activities and protect themselves most of the time instead of dying in the wild. Anatolian farmers and many others are the ancestors of First Indo europeans. Indo europeans invented many other things with their iqs and started migrating for better and greener lands and conquered most of Europe, Russia, Central Asia and India and maybe Middle east. Middle easterners are still caucasoids but they might be product of an earlier caucasoid migration of some Farmers.
People and animals who are born in colder climates also develop war, because resources are scarce there and hence they have to Fight a lot for it. While people living in plains maintained are generally peaceful and don't develop War strategies much eventhough they could. When Indo European Caucasoids first came they just dominated the local populations. The same domination we can see in India today. In Europe they mixed with other European tribes and also dominated there, same happened in Russia and Middle east. The ruling class of all these countries are pretty much indo european and are descedent from those Colder climate populations.
Imagine if a Polar bear invades Asia which has many Black bears but they wouldn't die out of warm climate or something. They would just dominate the black bears and take everything from them. Same happened with Humans. Later these indo europeans also colonized Americas, Australia and South Africa.
I guess its pretty normal to assume that this is why Africa couldn't colonize anyone or why India keeps getting cucked by foreigners and still is being cucked by aryans. While many people from academia try their best to do some mental gymnastics and feed ethics blue pill that white people have no clear advantage.
First we need to understand the difference between Phenotype and Genotype to debunk some counter arguments. Phenotype are all the external factors you have that can be seen and genotype is the real gene. So in context of India, many people say that how can Indo aryans be superior when the native african looking Indians have are much more simliar to them genologically than they are to European aryans.
But thing is that genology mostly doesn't matter. Indo europeans in India are mixed with many other native tribes and this is the reason their geneology got similiar. But their Phenotypes are pretty much very different eventhough you can see the mix.
Native indians of India look like Africans because it was first the Africans who migrated to India. Since both India and AFrica have similiar hot, wet climates, their phenotype didn't require any change eventhough their genotype went through a massive change due to mutation. Phenotypes are the real things that matter as it has external effects, your inner genes doesn't mean anything. So the argument that Europeans are more closer to north africans than to other europeans etc is very dumb.
Now phenotype is mostly determined through Climatic conditions under which a species evolves in. Normally it is found that Animals who live in Colder climates have much bigger bodies, physical strenghts and even Higher intillegence due to harsh conditions. Normally these animals are much bigger and stronger than their Warmer climate counterparts for example compare a Polar bear or a Siberian tiger to a Black bear or the Bengal tiger but they can't go into warmer climates since they will just die there. When Homo Sapiens first migrated to Europe they probably barely survived and mixed with a lot of neandratals acquiring their dna. Slowly they evolved into tougher humans with Higher iqs. However normally as nature states they couldn't go into warmer climates and just invade there.
But as Agriculture started to form in Middle east and many anatolian farmers also started agriculture. They brought agriculture to Europe. Now they didn't have to hunt for food, they could do other activities and protect themselves most of the time instead of dying in the wild. Anatolian farmers and many others are the ancestors of First Indo europeans. Indo europeans invented many other things with their iqs and started migrating for better and greener lands and conquered most of Europe, Russia, Central Asia and India and maybe Middle east. Middle easterners are still caucasoids but they might be product of an earlier caucasoid migration of some Farmers.
People and animals who are born in colder climates also develop war, because resources are scarce there and hence they have to Fight a lot for it. While people living in plains maintained are generally peaceful and don't develop War strategies much eventhough they could. When Indo European Caucasoids first came they just dominated the local populations. The same domination we can see in India today. In Europe they mixed with other European tribes and also dominated there, same happened in Russia and Middle east. The ruling class of all these countries are pretty much indo european and are descedent from those Colder climate populations.
Imagine if a Polar bear invades Asia which has many Black bears but they wouldn't die out of warm climate or something. They would just dominate the black bears and take everything from them. Same happened with Humans. Later these indo europeans also colonized Americas, Australia and South Africa.
I guess its pretty normal to assume that this is why Africa couldn't colonize anyone or why India keeps getting cucked by foreigners and still is being cucked by aryans. While many people from academia try their best to do some mental gymnastics and feed ethics blue pill that white people have no clear advantage.
