Blackpill I have a problem with the scientific part of the blackpill

[Puzzle]

I was reading an article about how humans evolved to become sexually promiscuous instead of monogamous, and quite honestly, a lot of it made sense, particularly regarding our morphology. For example, the 10-20% body-size dimorphism of humans is the same figure as that of chimpanzees and bonobos, who are promiscuous. But here's the problem with science: These are merely recurring observations that are correlations rather than causal relationships.

That's why I've always had trouble with the hypothesis that women engage in natural selection by choosing dominant Chads. Evolutionary biology, especially when it deals with human behavior, often works with inference rather than direct proof, and it's complete BULLSHIT.

"Oh trust me bro, Lions do X, humans are territorial, therefore humans do X"

That's why I have a problem with evolutionary biology and psychology: they try to explain human mechanisms and nature through ideologies that are flawed. We choose how our societies evolve. If women behave like hypergamous whores, it's because the entire system influences them rather than natural behavior.

Now for the schizo part: it's the elites who want you to believe this in order to establish their dominance, the same reason why the Anglo-Saxons used Darwinism to justify colonization.

 

[nico]

elite

marxist cunt.
gtfo

 

[Erenincel]

you are right, especially since our grandmothers were there because there was a different system.society now allows it and the elites simply build genetic modifications for themselves. especially since the inference is correct but does not tell the whole truth and the woman allows such behavior.

 

[Puzzle]

marxist cunt.
gtfo

Wrong, I'm not a Marxist, given that he himself benefited from transnational capitalism and was part of the elite.

"Chadam" yup another fakecel

 

[Erenincel]

marxist cunt.
gtfo

Marx wrote the truth about many things. He even wrote about us incels when describing the socialist movement. Perhaps he didn't know how to build it properly, but he described the causes well. I think someone should come along who would use genetic materialism and complete the Blackpill by showing the entire system of sexual selection, not just the biological premises that women now allow themselves to have.

 

[Puzzle]

Marx wrote the truth about many things. He even wrote about us incels when describing the socialist movement. Perhaps he didn't know how to build it properly, but he described the causes well. I think someone should come along who would use genetic materialism and complete the Blackpill by showing the entire system of sexual selection, not just the biological premises that women now allow themselves to have.

Marx is right in his analysis of capitalism, but his problem is that he believed that the solution was to make capital public and also believed that an elite was needed to lead the proletariat to paradise.

 

[nico]

Wrong, I'm not a Marxist, given that he himself benefited from transnational capitalism and was part of the elite.

"Chadam" yup another fakecel

VIRGINS ARE THE REAL CHADS

 

[Erenincel]

Marx is right in his analysis of capitalism, but his problem is that he believed that the solution was to make capital public and also believed that an elite was needed to lead the proletariat to paradise.

You are right This is what I write up. the fact is that we do not have to create our own society system for capital including appearance.

 

[Puzzle]

you are right, especially since our grandmothers were there because there was a different system.society now allows it and the elites simply build genetic modifications for themselves. especially since the inference is correct but does not tell the whole truth and the woman allows such behavior.

Yeah, the whole system is designed to benefit a minority, which is why women are only interested in 20% of men.

 

[Erenincel]

Yeah, the whole system is designed to benefit a minority, which is why women are only interested in 20% of men.

Yes. Benefits of elites And we're a lower social class than women. That's why they can fuck any woman they want, especially when genetic editing comes into play.

 

[Puzzle]

Yes. Benefits of elites And we're a lower social class than women. That's why they can fuck any woman they want, especially when genetic editing comes into play.

View: https://youtube.com/shorts/pzzRKmDNEIs?si=5r0ggtbpK7DV8hEz

 

[Erenincel]

This is why the elite can fuck every girl and you don't.

 

[Puzzle]

This is why the elite can fuck every girl and you don't.

And you MUST believe in genetic determinism, because it is your predetermined destiny and your place as a consumer , see the study how alpha males are superior lol

 

[Erenincel]

And you MUST believe in genetic determinism, because it is your predetermined destiny and your place as a consumer , see the study how alpha males are superior lol

They can buy it even if not now, then in the future you don't. and now, using feminism, they are creating a new system of technofeudalism and even making sure that every woman will want they.

 

[Erenincel]

Because Blackpill describes the biological mechanism but doesn't show everything. But they want to convince us that we have to suffer because of biological determinism, and that's not true. we suffer because of the elites who want it

 

[Lv99_BixNood]

That's why I've always had trouble with the hypothesis that women engage in natural selection by choosing dominant Chads. Evolutionary biology, especially when it deals with human behavior, often works with inference rather than direct proof, and it's complete BULLSHIT.

So your position is that there is no evolution? That human behavior is not influenced by evolution? Or what?

 

[Vilsonicvs]

The blackpill IS real and DOES have scientific evidence.

Scientific Blackpill

The Scientific Blackpill is about understanding the nature of human social and sexual behavior with a particular focus on evolutionary psychological perspectives...

incels.wiki

 

[160cmbloop]

lalalalala

natural selection

 

[Erenincel]

So your position is that there is no evolution? That human behavior is not influenced by evolution? Or what?

Blackpill is real but understand what he said.it's not just what has an impact there are still influences of the social system and culture and the current culture allows such hypergamous behavior and I agree with him

 

[Puzzle]

So your position is that there is no evolution? That human behavior is not influenced by evolution? Or what?

You ask good questions. Every day that science advances, another lie about evolution is exposed.

Remember the 98% of human DNA that they used to call "junk DNA" and that we were taught about in school? It turns out that this is the most important part that separates humans from chimpanzees. And it is this part that causes the biggest difference in the human brain. And the result is that the difference between the complete genome of humans and that of chimpanzees is 40%.

Evolution is a theory of gaps. Yes, it is dogmatic like the medieval Church.

 

[WastedPotential]

True, it's just correlation that tinder added a height filter
It's just correlation that western women prefer white males above all other ethnicities.
It's just correlation that women prefer more masculine facial features when ovulating.

 

[Puzzle]

True, it's just correlation that tinder added a height filter
It's just correlation that western women prefer white males above all other ethnicities.
It's just correlation that women prefer more masculine facial features when ovulating.

Nothing but strawman arguments to avoid responding to my point.

 

[WastedPotential]

Nothing but strawman arguments to avoid responding to my point.

I was reading an article about how humans evolved to become sexually promiscuous instead of monogamous, and quite honestly, a lot of it made sense, particularly regarding our morphology. For example, the 10-20% body-size dimorphism of humans is the same figure as that of chimpanzees and bonobos, who are promiscuous. But here's the problem with science: These are merely recurring observations that are correlations rather than causal relationships.

Women ARE sexually promiscuous by nature, Overtime we developed cultural institutions to enforce monogamy for child rearing and social cohesion / stability.

Nowadays these institutions are being corroded by feminism and foid's true nature is on full display. Women are free to be as promiscuous as they want without any consequence and they select men based on how much taller and masculine they are. ideally every women would want to settle down with the top 1%, but they can't so they'll settle for a bit lower. But in practice that means that basically every foid is still hypergamous.

This is not a correlation, like I said tinder added a heightfilter. you need to simply just look at the okcupid data.

That's why I've always had trouble with the hypothesis that women engage in natural selection by choosing dominant Chads. Evolutionary biology, especially when it deals with human behavior, often works with inference rather than direct proof, and it's complete BULLSHIT.

Yes, except the theories and hypotheses put forward by evo biology can be corroborated by data in the PRESENT day.
There's a reason people over here repeat terms like darktriad maxxing, height, facial aesthetics. because it's all based in reality. And it's backed up by data.

"Oh trust me bro, Lions do X, humans are territorial, therefore humans do X"

That's why I have a problem with evolutionary biology and psychology: they try to explain human mechanisms and nature through ideologies that are flawed. We choose how our societies evolve. If women behave like hypergamous whores, it's because the entire system influences them rather than natural behavior.

It's both, allowing feminism to prosper also in turn allowed female's hypergamous nature to go into overdrive. Combine that with modern technology and you get shit like tinder etc.

 

[WastedPotential]

Now for the schizo part: it's the elites who want you to believe this in order to establish their dominance, the same reason why the Anglo-Saxons used Darwinism to justify colonization.

Darwin published his theory of evolution in 1859, long after most colonization already happened.
European colonization was mostly justified through religion, and 'civilizing the savage natives' for their false beliefs.

I find your post to be very vague, who are you referring to exactly as the 'elites'?
Jews?, whites?
This reads like an incohesive rant without any point.

 

[WastedPotential]

@AtrociousCitizen gtfih

 

[AtrociousCitizen]

There is no doubt that society shapes behavior, but you can’t completely separate human instincts from biology; it is better understood as human instincts that are amplified by social and technological phenomena, which is the case for female hypergamy and sexual selection. Women evolved to select mates based on certain traits because it improved survival. That doesn’t mean every individual decision is biologically determined, but saying “it’s all culture” is just as simplistic as saying “it’s all biology.”

Patterns like mate preference, sexual dimorphism, and competition exist for a reason. Evolution psychology is speculative to an extent, but it is a well-researched body of science, and not only can it be observed in animals, but also in humans across almost all cultures. There are plenty of explanations for why certain behaviors occur, and why traits such as facial averageness are perceived as attractive; that, for example, signifies the person does not have major genetic defects or mutations that stray from the population average, hence the selection mechanism can recognize the person likely grew up in a healthy manner and is normative. Of course, there are plenty of other health indicators, and all of this is technically speculative, but it is highly plausible.

This is all a part of evolutionary psychology, and while it can be mitigated and twisted in various ways due to outside influence, the biological predisposition is definitely there, and it obviously has roots in how humans evolved.

 

[Cybersex is our hope]

marxist cunt.
gtfo

elites are real

 

[pedrolopezwasright]

I was reading an article about how humans evolved to become sexually promiscuous instead of monogamous, and quite honestly, a lot of it made sense, particularly regarding our morphology. For example, the 10-20% body-size dimorphism of humans is the same figure as that of chimpanzees and bonobos, who are promiscuous. But here's the problem with science: These are merely recurring observations that are correlations rather than causal relationships.

That's why I've always had trouble with the hypothesis that women engage in natural selection by choosing dominant Chads. Evolutionary biology, especially when it deals with human behavior, often works with inference rather than direct proof, and it's complete BULLSHIT.

"Oh trust me bro, Lions do X, humans are territorial, therefore humans do X"

That's why I have a problem with evolutionary biology and psychology: they try to explain human mechanisms and nature through ideologies that are flawed. We choose how our societies evolve. If women behave like hypergamous whores, it's because the entire system influences them rather than natural behavior.

Now for the schizo part: it's the elites who want you to believe this in order to establish their dominance, the same reason why the Anglo-Saxons used Darwinism to justify colonization.

This is liberal bullshit. Nobody is fucking being social, NTs just pretend they are because they have instincts to recognize pro-social behavior. Any of "soyciety members" would fucking beat to death 8 billion people and drink they blood just to have the hottest partner who loves them. Especially femoids, why you are even giving them humanity? thats cucked. Nobody before feminists even considered them above the level of an ape

 

[Grodd]

You ask good questions. Every day that science advances, another lie about evolution is exposed.

Remember the 98% of human DNA that they used to call "junk DNA" and that we were taught about in school? It turns out that this is the most important part that separates humans from chimpanzees. And it is this part that causes the biggest difference in the human brain. And the result is that the difference between the complete genome of humans and that of chimpanzees is 40%.

Evolution is a theory of gaps. Yes, it is dogmatic like the medieval Church.

You just don't understand evolution GrAY.

 

[nico]

elites are real

and there's nothing u can do about it whil3 being a dalit

 

[ColderManTruce]

and there's nothing u can do about it whil3 being a dalit

 

[Puzzle]

Women ARE sexually promiscuous by nature, Overtime we developed cultural institutions to enforce monogamy for child rearing and social cohesion / stability.

If women were naturally promiscuous, how do you explain that various hunter-gatherer societies practice monogamy? These bonds exist even where there is no religious enforcement, no property, and no state, which emerged mainly with the practice of agriculture. Female sexual behavior is context-dependent, not fixed.

Nowadays these institutions are being corroded by feminism and foid's true nature is on full display. Women are free to be as promiscuous as they want without any consequence and they select men based on how much taller and masculine they are.

Wrong, what's happening is that these patriarchal institutions are being replaced by modern hookup cultures that follow the logic of the free market, not female nature. Do you think it's natural to be competing with another guy who lives on a different continent because social media has broken down all barriers? That's exactly how corporations operate too.

Yes, except the theories and hypotheses put forward by evo biology can be corroborated by data in the PRESENT day.
There's a reason people over here repeat terms like darktriad maxxing, height, facial aesthetics. because it's all based in reality. And it's backed up by data.

Well yes, these are arguments that are treated as consensus, even though our knowledge of biology is constantly evolving. The black pill is useful for analyzing the current situation because it's true that it's the behaviors of the dark triad that are most rewarded in a competitive rather than cooperative society. It's the same reason why women pursue narcissistic men, because they often occupy positions of power and navigate society better.

 

[Puzzle]

Darwin published his theory of evolution in 1859, long after most colonization already happened.
European colonization was mostly justified through religion, and 'civilizing the savage natives' for their false beliefs.

I find your post to be very vague, who are you referring to exactly as the 'elites'?
Jews?, whites?
This reads like an incohesive rant without any point.

Darwin published right before the peak of imperial expansion, not after it ended. Search for "social Darwinism"

 

[Puzzle]

There is no doubt that society shapes behavior, but you can’t completely separate human instincts from biology; it is better understood as human instincts that are amplified by social and technological phenomena, which is the case for female hypergamy and sexual selection. Women evolved to select mates based on certain traits because it improved survival. That doesn’t mean every individual decision is biologically determined, but saying “it’s all culture” is just as simplistic as saying “it’s all biology.”

This is all a part of evolutionary psychology, and while it can be mitigated and twisted in various ways due to outside influence, the biological predisposition is definitely there, and it obviously has roots in how humans evolved.

Perhaps I didn't express myself clearly, but I'm not saying that everything is determined by culture. Rather, I'm saying that nature is inherently chaotic and that attempting to categorize and find patterns is wrong. For over a hundred years, we've been classifying living beings according to how they look and are put together anatomically, but molecular data often tells us a rather different story. Survival of the fittest is bullshit