Serious I have a hard time seeing women as human beings

[MuddyBuddy]

When I say human beings I mean a person worthy of some level of moral consideration. I see a human as someone I can form a social contract with. We can come to some level of understanding regarding social conduct and I can reliably hold them to some level of moral conduct. When I look at modern women I tend to see them advocate and excuse actions that are morally reprehensible and even vigorously defend them as well. The most clear example is abortion. The prime example of a moral harm for most well adjusted humans is that it is wrong to harm the innocent. Hurting a baby is widely considered to be the most morally reprehensible thing a person can do. Yet it is widely accepted in soyciety that women have the moral right, and some might even argue the moral imperative to kill their own babies in their wombs.

When I think of regarding a person with moral consideration I must ask myself, can i hold this person to a reasonable level of moral conduct? If there is a severely mentally disable person who poses a high risk to my safety it is generally considered acceptable to limit their rights as a person. With modern women, we cannot hold them to the moral standard that it is wrong to kill babies. Let that sink it. We cannot hold women to the standard that killing babies is wrong. If perhaps the ultimate evil is considered perfectly permissible to women then how can I hold them to any kind of ethical standard?

 

[deleted fren]

Women feel no remorse in general. They're sociopathic and narcissistic parasites who only care about furthering their interests. They masturbate to attractive men killing random people.

 

[Icarus]

Women are toilets

 

[4sez]

tl;dr: it's over

 

[AutistSupremacist]

Women are toilets

 

[justuseless]

I feel that way for most people regardless of gender

 

[MuddyBuddy]

Women are toilets

 

[Grodd]

Foids don't deserve to be called human

 

[Rick prime]

Women feel no remorse in general. They're sociopathic and narcissistic parasites who only care about furthering their interests. They masturbate to attractive men killing random people.

This is why misogyny should keep happening. They are literal monsters

 

[Anthrofurrcel]

@AtrociousCitizen thots?

 

[AtrociousCitizen]

@AtrociousCitizen thots?

The fact we can’t even say 'don’t kill babies' without being called misogynists proves the point. Women are immoral creatures and the unfortunate reality is majority of men don't even try to hold them accountable for their wrongdoings. They’re not humans, they’re parasites—abortion’s just their way of flexing control over life itself. I don't think women have the cognitive ability to understand morals like we do. In general, they are more concerned with short-term emotional gratification than long-term, logical and rational thoughts. They lack the ability to think critically and logically due to their nature as females.

 

[Feeshtu]

I mean it in more of a literal way.
Foids are literally not human.

Foids lack all of the characteristics of being human.
Such as, empathy, compassion, remorse, and love.
Additionally, foids have no sense of the tribe, and no ability to think logically or abstractly.

A foid seeks only to benefit herself…….and she doesn’t care who she has to destroy to do it.

 

[chalk son]

and think for a moment, if a foid were groyped and didn’t abort to let a childless couple who’d adopt and dote on the child so the foid wouldn’t have to be reminded of her groypist that would surely demonstrate the impossibility of the ability to possess something like beyond selfless sentience despite initially unproportionate emotional instability. but that’s preposterous for them since it’s not solipsistic

 

[Genetics_subhuman]

When I say human beings I mean a person worthy of some level of moral consideration. I see a human as someone I can form a social contract with. We can come to some level of understanding regarding social conduct and I can reliably hold them to some level of moral conduct. When I look at modern women I tend to see them advocate and excuse actions that are morally reprehensible and even vigorously defend them as well. The most clear example is abortion. The prime example of a moral harm for most well adjusted humans is that it is wrong to harm the innocent. Hurting a baby is widely considered to be the most morally reprehensible thing a person can do. Yet it is widely accepted in soyciety that women have the moral right, and some might even argue the moral imperative to kill their own babies in their wombs.

When I think of regarding a person with moral consideration I must ask myself, can i hold this person to a reasonable level of moral conduct? If there is a severely mentally disable person who poses a high risk to my safety it is generally considered acceptable to limit their rights as a person. With modern women, we cannot hold them to the moral standard that it is wrong to kill babies. Let that sink it. We cannot hold women to the standard that killing babies is wrong. If perhaps the ultimate evil is considered perfectly permissible to women then how can I hold them to any kind of ethical standard?

They ain't

 

[Veiko]

To some extent I view women as emotionless automatons who are incapable of feeling basic empathy I genuinely couldn't care if they get raped it wouldn't really matter since they seem to like it but I rarely view them as "Human"