Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

I hate people who have money, I really fucking do.

  • Thread starter Deleted member 7448
  • Start date
That's a great point

because of inflation, most asset prices, like large cap stocks, gold, only increase with time

but each year you age, you rapidly lose SMV and appeal to women. Perhaps as much as 10% per year until you're late 20s and left with nothing, if you even had much to start with
Pretty much yeah. Even if you moneymaxx and get surgeries that turn out well (big if), you still won't be as attractive as what you could have been if you had been born more attractive to begin with, or if you had those surgeries earlier in life

This whole thing about men "reaching their peak" later in life (30s, 40s) is always "backed up" with pictures of certain celebrities. Celebrities who were often very good looking to begin with, celebrities who make 6-7 figures and have 7-8 figures in the bank or in assets. Celebrities who can therefore afford the best of hair transplants, skin care and surgeries. It's so dishonest and absolutely not representative of the average man.

It's like those delusional natty gymcels who justify their training/diet by showing you some steroid abusing buffoon on ig. Stupid motherfuckers thinking they can achieve the same thing
 
Pretty much yeah. Even if you moneymaxx and get surgeries that turn out well (big if), you still won't be as attractive as what you could have been if you had been born more attractive to begin with, or if you had those surgeries earlier in life

This whole thing about men "reaching their peak" later in life (30s, 40s) is always "backed up" with pictures of certain celebrities. Celebrities who were often very good looking to begin with, celebrities who make 6-7 figures and have 7-8 figures in the bank or in assets. Celebrities who can therefore afford the best of hair transplants, skin care and surgeries. It's so dishonest and absolutely not representative of the average man.

It's like those delusional natty gymcels who justify their training/diet by showing you some steroid abusing buffoon on ig. Stupid motherfuckers thinking they can achieve the same thing

trying to guess the SMV loss per year as a man depressed the fuck out of me, tbh

i hate it when people move goal posts and mix up earning potential which increases by age with SMV, and claim they're the same

thus any "incel" can pull himself up by the bootstraps
 
trying to guess the SMV loss per year as a man depressed the fuck out of me, tbh

i hate it when people move goal posts and mix up earning potential which increases by age with SMV, and claim they're the same

thus any "incel" can pull himself up by the bootstraps
I think the inevitability of it and the lack of control is what is depressing

But tbh if it wasn't for balding i wouldn't even have noticed that i've been aging. Now that balding has opened my eyes i've also noticed that my skin is aging. It's subtle but it's there.

Plus all men shrink over time. You can easily lose an inch or two after a couple of decades, all while the younger generations are getting taller and taller. Manletisation over time
 
I do not see no problem with rich people

Some do work hard and some yes actually didn't work that hard n all dat
 
Making money: luck, nepotism, exceptional intelligence & motivation, exceptional athleticism, being a charismatic ass-licker sell-out (politician for example).

Those are the main ways.

The difference in 2020 between working class and middle class isn't much. It might give a slight smv boost or a few more options but that's it. The real difference is between the middle class and the ultra rich elites. Even then, what can money get you besides better whores? I guess a boat would be nice.
Unfortunately you are right. Damned if you do, damned if you don't. But tbh even the shitty reality that is communism would be better. All poor together, no rich fucks to suck the lifeblood out of us while we are paid pennies and told that we too can become rich and suck the blood out of others, if only we slave harder.
Cope. China is the end goal of communism. Godless controlled population under modern slavery, ruled over by party members and billionaires. This is why billionaires fund all of these Marxist groups in America like BLM, antifa, different NGOs.
 
Last edited:
you're speaking the truth man i myself also fucking sick of wage slaving and living like a slave who needs his master to get a food on his table and even to have a shelter
 
There should honestly be a worldwide communist revolution to overthrow these elite jews.
Hates the jewish system.

Wants to install jewish system.

How about national socialism?

With proper eugenics no more Incels in a few generations...
 
Hates the jewish system.

Wants to install jewish system.

How about national socialism?

With proper eugenics no more Incels in a few generations...
Shit u right
National Socialism FTW
:dab:
 
I'll give you some of my money if you draw a good Merula picture.
 
Here's the global wealth pyramid, so you can check where you or your relatives stand:

Distribution richesse monde 2019
 
I hate good looking people
 
Tbh one reason I believe such things would never work is because we are in a manifestly dog-eat-dog world and men are engineered to always fight for being at the top. I for one will admit that I could not accept a communist system in which I'm made equal to all others. I would try to exploit it until I'm better off.

You'll interject that this makes me a bad person, and you'd be right, but like I said it's a Darwinian world. Morality doesn't mean shit, fairness doesn't mean shit either --- all that matters is power, and offspring.
I don't think that it necessarily makes you a bad person, I think it means that the game you've been forced into playing is awful. If you give someone a choice between forcing another person to experience suffering, or choosing to experience the same suffering themselves, would they be a "bad person" for picking the former? The reality is that this isn't really a choice at all, people are tortured into participating in cruelty just to sustain their own bodies, also to avoid loneliness and inceldom if male, and the only way out is suicide. This is one of the reasons why I don't believe that humans really have moral agency.

At least you're being honest about it here, that's far better than most. But I can't even properly describe how much I hate this world, and the feeling just grows stronger the older that I get. It would genuinely be better if nothing existed at all as opposed to this.
 
Last edited:
I want to let them feel helpless, let them feel the fucking pain, let them feel,like me
 
I don't think that it necessarily makes you a bad person, I think it means that the game you've been forced into playing is awful. If you give someone a choice between forcing another person to experience suffering, or choosing to experience the same suffering themselves, would they be a "bad person" for picking the former? The reality is that this isn't really a choice at all, people are tortured into participating in cruelty just to sustain their own bodies, also to avoid loneliness and inceldom if male, and the only way out is suicide. This is one of the reasons why I don't believe that humans really have moral agency.

At least you're being honest about it here, that's far better than most. But I can't even properly describe how much I hate this world, and the feeling just grows stronger the older that I get. It would genuinely be better if nothing existed at all as opposed to this.
Agreed. It's a cruel world basically by design. That's why I kinda JFL at the people who describe God as all-loving.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top