Serious I hate nature, seriously

[Robinxyz]

Why did looks have to play such a crucial role in determining who gets to breed? Why couldn't women chase men the same way men choose women? We have experiments of thirsty dudes messaging disabled foids. Damn it.

 

[UnfortunatelyINCEL98]

because god made it that way teehee

 

[non_factor]

because god made it that way teehee

The ultimate blackpill is that god is a man hating feminist.

 

[Deleted member 1983]

because life is cancer and death is the cure.

 

[Creep]

Mother Nature is the biggest bitch of them all. She is Satan.

 

[Deleted member 8353]

Every observation made of nature can be summarized as pure callousness, and a pointless, self perpetuating cycle of death. These questions answer themselves.

But still, iktf.

 

[Robtical]

Nature needs to be controlled. If men were able to let their nature run wild rape and murder would be as common as walking across the street. Femoid nature needs to be controlled for the safety and betterment of the group.

 

[big nose bug eyes]

Looks never used to play a huge role in breeding until the last decade or so when social media and online dating made it so you can only see someone's picture. Hell not too long ago women used to be married by their fathers at a young age.

There's a lot that goes into attraction other than facial composition (obviously it's the most important but it was never the ONLY thing that mattered), but it's been thrown out the window because all you see on tinder is a pic. Good height, voice, money, status etc are not possible to see on tinder.

 

[Deleted member 8353]

Looks never used to play a huge role in breeding until the last decade or so when social media and online dating made it so you can only see someone's picture. Hell not too long ago women used to be married by their fathers at a young age.

There's a lot that goes into attraction other than facial composition (obviously it's the most important but it was never the ONLY thing that mattered), but it's been thrown out the window because all you see on tinder is a pic. Good height, voice, money, status etc are not possible to see on tinder.

On the contrary, we've regressed back to a natural state. Monogamy had to be enforced within a societal structure, this isn't natural human behavior, only the advent of agriculture allowed for it. The majority of males that ever lived died without reproducing.

However, apps like tinder do make this even worse.

 

[The Stryker]

LOL, why would you hate "mother" nature?

Nature is a little bitch who has been completely and utterly tamed. All animals and all forests now under man's dominion. Women bought and sold and traded for in 99% of the world up until America.

On the contrary, we've regressed back to a natural state. Monogamy had to be enforced within a societal structure, this isn't natural human behavior, only the advent of agriculture allowed for it. The majority of males that ever lived died without reproducing.

Completely and utterly wrong. Australian Aboriginal are described as having "owned" their women, a woman who was caught sleeping with a slow status male or a man other than her husband would be put to death along with the offender. These were kangaroo hunting aboriginals.

 

[big nose bug eyes]

On the contrary, we've regressed back to a natural state. Monogamy had to be enforced within a societal structure, this isn't natural human behavior, only the advent of agriculture allowed for it. The majority of males that ever lived died without reproducing.

However, apps like tinder do make this even worse.

Trust me social media and females in the workforce is NOT a natural state, not in the slightest, in a natural state you're competing with men locally to collect resources, if you have more resources, you get more women who could not collect resources as efficiently for her children. Looks played a far smaller role.

Now compare that to today, thanks to social media, you're competing with EVERY man in the city, women don't need resource as badly since many of them are delaying having children to finish school as well as choosing to have a career (since careers are starting to become oriented more in the office rather than outdoors in labor) or just leeching off the state, so they just choose guys that make THEM happy, and of course they're going to choose 6'4'' ripped 8+ men. That's why a multimillionaire can still be incel because frankly women don't give two fucks about money anymore, unless they're poor, but chances are if you're a multimillionaire you're going to be living in a neighborhood where everyone is rich so it comes down to looks anyways.

What we have is some weird topsy-turvy world where women start calling the shots. This is of course, completely subsidized by the government. Anti-rape laws transfer responsibility of the husband and family members to care for the woman, to the police; gender quotas ensure women get hired despite not being qualified; and of course, the welfare state generously gives women money per child. Meanwhile social media and tinder are allowed in the unmitigated capitalist society to erode all remnants of any sort of dating culture and transfer responsibility of choosing a partner from the father to the woman who can view every guy she wants the fuck in the palm of her hands.

 

[The Stryker]

Hahahahahahahahahahahaha "anti-rape laws"

 

[Robtical]

On the contrary, we've regressed back to a natural state. Monogamy had to be enforced within a societal structure, this isn't natural human behavior, only the advent of agriculture allowed for it. The majority of males that ever lived died without reproducing.

However, apps like tinder do make this even worse.

But before monogamy and controlling hypergamy, the world was more violent and technology wasn't progressing. Controlling femoids is good for everyone, even femoids who were monogamous before feminism were much happier and not as depressed as they are today.

 

[Veganist]

same. I can't get over the fact that I am lacking at every single aspect of life

 

[_wifebeater_]

Because nature is female.

 

[Deleted member 8353]

Trust me social media and females in the workforce is NOT a natural state, not in the slightest, in a natural state you're competing with men locally to collect resources, if you have more resources, you get more women who could not collect resources as efficiently for her children. Looks played a far smaller role.

Now compare that to today, thanks to social media, you're competing with EVERY man in the city, women don't need resource as badly since many of them are delaying having children to finish school as well as choosing to have a career (since careers are starting to become oriented more in the office rather than outdoors in labor) or just leeching off the state, so they just choose guys that make THEM happy, and of course they're going to choose 6'4'' ripped 8+ men.

What we have is some weird topsy-turvy world where women start calling the shots. This is of course, completely subsidized by the government. Anti-rape laws transfer responsibility of the husband and family members to care for the woman, to the police; gender quotas ensure women get hired despite not being qualified; and of course, the welfare state generously gives women money per child. Meanwhile social media and tinder are allowed in the unmitigated capitalist society to erode all remnants of any sort of dating culture and transfer responsibility of choosing a partner from the father to the woman who can view every guy she wants the fuck in the palm of her hands.

I wasn't saying that feminism is a natural state, I'm saying that in a natural environment females will select the highest value male available to them. You're correct in saying that technology allows them to have far more options available to them, but it's not the main cause. The current state of the society and the sexual market can be traced back at least to late 19th century modernism, and the rejection of tradition and hierarchy which had structured the west for over a millennium. So what I'm saying is, technology isn't exactly the main problem, in an ideal world, hypergamy would be kept in check by society, and apps like tinder wouldn't even exist.

But before monogamy and controlling hypergamy, the world was more violent and technology wasn't progressing. Controlling femoids is good for everyone, even femoids who were monogamous before feminism were much happier and not as depressed as they are today.

I agree with you, my post wan't an appeal to nature, as nature and evolution are some of the only things which I truly despise.

 

[Mainländer]

I blame nature for making so many men manginas/cucks than for making looks inequality.

I'm ugly but I'm a healthy human being, the problem is that women got too much licentiousness thanks to cucks.

 

[GeneticDysfunction]

because life is cancer and death is the cure.

 

[Zyros]

Its actually worse. Looks play a massive role in EVERYTHING in life. Fucn if it only was about sex...

 

[TrueAlphaMale]

It's not just about looks. Genetics determine so much in life. your intelligence you immune system, your talents, your strength are all determined by genetics
It's not just about looks. Genetics determine so much in life. your intelligence you immune system, your talents, your strength are all determined by genetics

 

[Asianmanletcel]

we must fuck natuRE literally in hER pussy in order to REprogram that makes us incels the advantage